I believe it was dateline where I saw it as well. The 3 people involved were part of a rather large community that made their living off scams like this. The funniest part about the whole thing was it was there greed that did them in. An argument ensued when one of the 3 people in the part's name was not present on the check. Disney withdrew their offer and turned it over to the police.Thanks Yoda for remembering the details of that case. I just remember seeing it on dateline or something.
When Michael Jackson was first accused of molestation, the settlement was so huge, THAT implied guilt. That implied a public figure who really needed this problem to just go away.
Actually, when it comes to this situation, my thinking is if it's a piddling amount of money, it has the opposite effect. It doesn't imply guilt on Disney's part, it doesn't even imply that Disney considers it a serious problem that it wants to just go away.
What it implies is that this is not worthy of Disney's concern, that they know the Monacos are after a payday, and offering them such a low sum implies just that, that the Monacos always wanted money after the incident occurred (and after they claimed they only wanted to apologize). After taxes and lawyer's fees, the Monacos wouldn't even have enough to cover a mortgage payment, let alone the big bucks they thought they were gonna get. And the backlash they've received and will continue to receive (especially that kid at the hands of classmates who know that he can't even handle himself with a guy in a Tigger costume) will make them SO wish they never contacted the media.
I understand the desire, the ethic, the moral stand to not want to give this family one thin dime. But I also understand that karma works in strange and awe-inspiring ways, and sometimes, there are ways to help karma along a little quicker. You can give people enough rope to hang themselves, and I'd bet a shiny red apple if the Monacos were offered a 3 grand settlement, with the knowledge that theyir lives would become incredibly miserable if they didn't accept it, within weeks they'll regret ever asking for anything.
I agree but what worries me is how the media will spin it. There is no real way for the media to spin "Our cast member did nothing wrong and we have evidence to prove it. See you in court" On the flip side there are a million ways to spin "Disney awarded the Monacos $3000 in an out of court settlement" and most of them are bad.When Michael Jackson was first accused of molestation, the settlement was so huge, THAT implied guilt. That implied a public figure who really needed this problem to just go away.
Actually, when it comes to this situation, my thinking is if it's a piddling amount of money, it has the opposite effect. It doesn't imply guilt on Disney's part, it doesn't even imply that Disney considers it a serious problem that it wants to just go away.
What it implies is that this is not worthy of Disney's concern, that they know the Monacos are after a payday, and offering them such a low sum implies just that, that the Monacos always wanted money after the incident occurred (and after they claimed they only wanted to apologize). After taxes and lawyer's fees, the Monacos wouldn't even have enough to cover a mortgage payment, let alone the big bucks they thought they were gonna get. And the backlash they've received and will continue to receive (especially that kid at the hands of classmates who know that he can't even handle himself with a guy in a Tigger costume) will make them SO wish they never contacted the media.
I understand the desire, the ethic, the moral stand to not want to give this family one thin dime. But I also understand that karma works in strange and awe-inspiring ways, and sometimes, there are ways to help karma along a little quicker. You can give people enough rope to hang themselves, and I'd bet a shiny red apple if the Monacos were offered a 3 grand settlement, with the knowledge that theyir lives would become incredibly miserable if they didn't accept it, within weeks they'll regret ever asking for anything.
I agree but what worries me is how the media will spin it. There is no real way for the media to spin "Our cast member did nothing wrong and we have evidence to prove it. See you in court" On the flip side there are a million ways to spin "Disney awarded the Monacos $3000 in an out of court settlement" and most of them are bad.
I agree but what worries me is how the media will spin it. There is no real way for the media to spin "Our cast member did nothing wrong and we have evidence to prove it. See you in court" On the flip side there are a million ways to spin "Disney awarded the Monacos $3000 in an out of court settlement" and most of them are bad.
Nice to see that Tigger is moving past all this and getting back to work!
Of course Disney could just go and say ok fine this $3000.00 is a refund for your trip. Never come here again.
Really??? That is great to hear!!!! Any news on how the CM is doing?? Belle
Giving a refund implies that services weren't rendered as promised. It's still admitting responsibility.
Mine will be a little more... errr... imaginitive... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:Yay! I have a new avatar! :sohappy: :lookaroun
Agreed. But in the grand sceem of thing Disney will want to push past all this. I can only hope that the CM will not be found at fault. Look at the case of in approprate touching. Can you actually see out of that head to be able to hit someone?
I'm sure they would have 100 times more lawsuits than they do have.
We really haven't heard from the CM yet. I'm sure his side of the story will be interesting. Unless we have and I have caught that thread.
Well he's had plenty of time now to make up something really good. :lol: :lol:
This has been said before, but he is not allowed to speak publically.
Well he's had plenty of time now to make up something really good. :lol: :lol:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.