Asking the parents about the kids actions does nothing to forward this story, nor does polling the other parents int he group. This story was about Disney's enforcement of a policy and had nothing to do with the groups actions or there feelings on it.
How can you not say whether the punishment is right or wrong? The group in question had individuals involved in a fight which clearly violated Disney's standard agreement that all large groups visting Disney agree to abide by.
I disagree with you that it is a harsh punishement. It's not, it's the punishment Disney spelled out clearly in their policy. Now people are prodded to feel sympathy? That's a big part of the problem today, the media is always looking for excuses to justify poor behavior. Disney in this article is being portrayed as the bad guy by waking up families with their infants in the middle of the night and tossing them out on the streets. Fact is, individuals within these groups broke the rules and everyone in the group had to pay the price.
Finally, I don't thing anyone is flaming all 100 families, they're flaming the ones responsible.
Didja read the article? Titled
Kids Thrown Out Of Disney
It wasn't titled kids get into fight at Disney and are punished according to their contract.
It isn't a long article either. There is one quote from one parent.
"They could have handled it so much better, you know? They really could have. They could have said look you know what? Fine, you guys have to leave in the morning. Then our babies. We have one year old, two year old, three year olds, that we had to just jerk out of bed and they were just crying. You know it was just a bad scene. It was really a bad scene," said Labryanna Kubo, a parent traveling with the Hawaii team.
Doesn't say if she's a parent of one of the kids in the altercation. She isn't DRIVING since she's from Hawaii. She may have a flight that's still 5 days away and now has to find a place to stay. She can't just decide to DRIVE back home. That might not be an expense her family can handle. Didja also know that many of these people come on fund raisers as well???
The more I think about it the harder the punishment seems if the families not directly related to the incident were treated.
We can all stand behind the agreement that life at WDW during early December would be so much better without Pop Warner. Anybody that has ever been at this time will gladly tell you at least 3-4 ways the groups have made their trips less pleasant than if they didn't exist. And that's not the point. I personally would rather not go than stay at ASM again that week. But if you can't see how this is a bit much, I'm not going to convince you otherwise.
And as far as the article goes, it is a jaded article. Not there to tell the whole story. Anybody that reads a paper or watches the news that thinks they are getting a non-bias story are fooling themselves.
Sounds like we're on the same point of view here.
But as far as flaming all families. Yes. It's been the point of most of the replies on this thread.
Get over your hate for Pop Warner and look at it from another point of view.
Let's say it's MAKE-A-WISH instead. A few Make-a-Wish kids get into a fight at the parks and violate their contract terms. I'm guessing we have a TOTALLY different agruement here.
Do we then say that the families of the 30 Make-A-Wish kids that are here for a special Make-A-Wish event are then evicted. Make-A-Wish kids can fight too. Big Luke (So, was that Small Wonder or Punky Brewster or Silver Spoons, or something else entirely?) might not keep a kid from throwing down if they have their feelings hurt. Would all the other families be then expected to evacuate because of a few sour apples?