All Magic Kingdom, All the Time (aka Has Disney given up on Space Mountain?)

EPCOT Explorer

New Member
I read the statement. That might not have been what you meant, but it came across that way, so I edited it.

Again, be careful as you - and others around here - seem to be constantly walking that thin line between disagreement and insult, and debate and argument.
Thank you!:wave:

Not to mention Walt designed scores of rides with exactly the same ride mechanism based on marketing his movies for Disneyland, if that is the criteria we are using.

I really don't think what we do now is so different than what he did then from a marketing and brand awareness perspective.

Exactly. SSE is a Omnimover, so is HM. Are they the same?:shrug:


As for WALL-E- GREAT fit for TL!:D But why should he have to take Buzz's or even Stitch's place? Stitch is a OK attraction. Could be better and more Original, of course, but it "works".


WALL-E would work great in that spot, though....:lookaroun Especially if it's used in conjunction with the Axiom Escape Pod scene.:D:sohappy:

*loves WALL-E*:o
 

Jasonflz

Well-Known Member
As for WALL-E- GREAT fit for TL!:D But why should he have to take Buzz's or even Stitch's place? Stitch is a OK attraction. Could be better and more Original, of course, but it "works".


WALL-E would work great in that spot, though....:lookaroun Especially if it's used in conjunction with the Axiom Escape Pod scene.:D:sohappy:

*loves WALL-E*:o

:D I can think of better fits not based on movies that should be there.
 

disneysroyal411

New Member
I think they should put a Tron ride where MILF is and move MILF to PP at DHS. Then the Tron ride takes place on the motorcycle type vehicles that he rides on and they make it another E-Ticket Roller Coaster. I mean they already have that ride system out. The only problem is crammed space!
 

The Conundrum

New Member
Original Poster
I think they should put a Tron ride where MILF is and move MILF to PP at DHS. Then the Tron ride takes place on the motorcycle type vehicles that he rides on and they make it another E-Ticket Roller Coaster. I mean they already have that ride system out. The only problem is crammed space!

The problem is MILF doesn't have enough space for that. They would hvae to do some major (and controverstial) restructuring of the entire front of Tomorrowland in order to accomodate an e-ticket.

What they should do is have the Timekeeper/MILF building absorb the noodle station and the buzz light year side of the building and then they can build a good dark ride in there worthy of Tomorrowland.
 

_Scar

Active Member
The problem is MILF doesn't have enough space for that. They would hvae to do some major (and controverstial) restructuring of the entire front of Tomorrowland in order to accomodate an e-ticket.

What they should do is have the Timekeeper/MILF building absorb the noodle station and the buzz light year side of the building and then they can build a good dark ride in there worthy of Tomorrowland.


You are practically the only one who strongly dislikes Buzz! With some imagination.... I'm sure the imagineers could come up with combining Milf and SSE without something major happening to the entrance.


IMO, they could also do a 3D ride with Wall-E along the lines of ITTBAB. Wall-E could be an animatronic like flik and he and Eve could showcase all the different robots.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
Buzz fits, but rip it out and begin again with a decent budget, not something shoehorned in to quickly replace an unsponsored attraction that was beginning to stand out in the new(ish) Tomorrowland.
 

Skip

Well-Known Member
Buzz fits, but rip it out and begin again with a decent budget, not something shoehorned in to quickly replace an unsponsored attraction that was beginning to stand out in the new(ish) Tomorrowland.

This I would not oppose to if it entailed not mentioning toys in any form. Like I said before, if they base it PURELY off of the TV show (which did not contain toy references), it would work in Tomorrowland.

That said, as it currently stands, the ride is incredibly weak, which I also stated earlier. It pales in comparison to Men in Black or even Midway Mania... it's about on par with the Sally Scooby dark rides, which is pretty sad considering this is a Disney theme park.
 
This I would not oppose to if it entailed not mentioning toys in any form. Like I said before, if they base it PURELY off of the TV show (which did not contain toy references), it would work in Tomorrowland.

That said, as it currently stands, the ride is incredibly weak, which I also stated earlier. It pales in comparison to Men in Black or even Midway Mania... it's about on par with the Sally Scooby dark rides, which is pretty sad considering this is a Disney theme park.
No theme park can be perfect no even WDW. You want to no what else is sad the Hannah Montana house being placed in the Backlot Tour at MGM. Also they need to remove MILF. That attraction should have been moved to Pixar Place. It has absolutely no business in TL.
 

The Conundrum

New Member
Original Poster
No theme park can be perfect no even WDW. You want to no what else is sad the Hannah Montana house being placed in the Backlot Tour at MGM. Also they need to remove MILF. That attraction should have been moved to Pixar Place. It has absolutely no business in TL.

I would argue that Disneyland, Tokyo Disneysea, and Tokyo Disneyland are all pretty close to perfection.

Epcot Center from opening up until about 1998 was near perfect as well.
 

SirGoofy

Member
I would argue that Disneyland, Tokyo Disneysea, and Tokyo Disneyland are all pretty close to perfection.

Epcot Center from opening up until about 1998 was near perfect as well.

I'll throw DLP in. Looks as close to perfect as one can be. Minus the lack of the Jungle Cruise that is.:lol:
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
I would argue that Disneyland, Tokyo Disneysea, and Tokyo Disneyland are all pretty close to perfection.

Epcot Center from opening up until about 1998 was near perfect as well.

Having been to all four of those parks, I would very much agree with you.

It's very odd how Disney let Magic Kingdom Park at WDW get into the state it is in. It wasn't overnight, it was bit by bit, small decision by big decision, with several different executive teams to blame, over the course of a couple of decades. But look what it is today compared to what it could have been had they taken different paths, and it's rather unfortunate what Magic Kingdom now offers to its guests.

Just a really weird place for Magic Kingdom to find itself in after 35 years. :confused:
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom