JD80
Well-Known Member
We have different definitions of majestic I think.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
Websters says something that is impressive or beautiful. Why can't a theme park attraction be this? The person does not have to be invalidated by you.
.
It is called subjective.
Last edited:
SplashMountainArchives
Active Member
Please DO NOT crop my watermark from my rendering post. It's an exclusive, it's there for a reason.
SourcererMark79
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Walking over the bridge this evening from BTMRR toward Pecos before HEA I heard a melodic and peaceful "Colors of the Wind"...in Frontierland? Is this recent? Quite a shift from the typical banjo old west genre I am accustomed to.
Any chance this is the begining of a slow shift toward a New Frontierland now that TBA is opening soon?
Any chance this is the begining of a slow shift toward a New Frontierland now that TBA is opening soon?
SplashMountainArchives
Active Member
I told y'all and some of you claimed my info was "outdated"
Right once again
Juneteenth is now a possibility according to some of my people close to the project for the Grand Opening in Florida, but we'll have to wait and see. Disney will release the last batch of critter reveals this coming Tuesday and we may get more information.
Also I cannot stress how disappointed I was when we got the poster, there were so many possibilities for the artwork, I really despise the new trend of attraction posters being created digitally and being so simplistic, an example is now Bayou and Runaway Railway. Keep in mind Splash Mountain's poster was painted BY HAND. I really wish we could get more elaborate artwork for attraction posters done with traditional mediums.
Bayou
Well-Known Member
My apologies. I actually took the screen shot from a YouTube video in which the hosts were blocking the watermark. This won't happen again.
SplashMountainArchives
Active Member
No worries you're good, If you don't mind could you send me the video in question privately?
TheEPCOTHistorian
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- Yes
It’s the orchestral version from the preshow loop for the fireworks. Gorgeous piece of music.
Dear Prudence
Well-Known Member
Omg, I NEED this.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
But it DOES appear to have been outdated... No one ever denied that the renders you obtained were real, and that most/all of what appeared in them at that point in time would also likely be present in the final ride. It's your claim that there would only the 9 characters in the finale that people (myself in particular) were questioning. At the very least, we now know that the Beaver will also be present there. With that, it's a pretty safe assumption that the other main critters should be there too. Quite possibly all 18 of them.
Disgruntled Walt
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
I don't know that I would count the "Rocking Lottie" as an A1000 AA.
Bayou
Well-Known Member
Do you know if her mouth is articulated? It's weird if its just going to be open like that.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
If there are missing characters in a render, then it's outdated. Especially if it was explicitly stated that these were all we would be getting period.
Based on the diagram for the Otter (if accurate), not all of the critters are going to be as simple as the Beaver. I'd also venture a guess that some of the larger ones from the most recent batch are likely to have more movement than the smaller ones. And I even say this as someone who is pretty disappointed that the Beaver appears to be so simple.
Back in September last year, Archive said that only Charlotte's father and Naveen's parents would be added to the scene beyond what the renders showed. Which again, itself is another point of evidence that it wasn't up to date. He also said not to expect any extra characters at all. Only saying that maybe a couple of static critters could be added last minute. Even with the Beaver's simple movements, it's not static.
News - Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress
These are very interesting. And believe it or not, they've actually partially alleviated some of my concerns about there only being 6 AA's. They do indeed look legitimate, and I can imagine it's fairly accurate to the sets they construct. But it's also clear that the renders can't be used to...
I don't know what model she is, but I sort of doubt she's a simple moving prop either. that video clip isn't remotely long enough to establish her range of motion.
mickEblu
Well-Known Member
I like the MMRR poster for Disneyland. Does DHS have a different one?
Any word on Dr Facilier being on the ride?
SplashMountainArchives
Active Member
If there are missing characters in a render, then it's outdated. Especially if it was explicitly stated that these were all we would be getting period.
Based on the diagram for the Otter (if accurate), not all of the critters are going to be as simple as the Beaver. I'd also venture a guess that some of the larger ones from the most recent batch are likely to have more movement than the smaller ones. And I even say this as someone who is pretty disappointed that the Beaver appears to be so simple.
Back in September last year, Archive said that only Charlotte's father and Naveen's parents would be added to the scene beyond what the renders showed. Which again, itself is another point of evidence that it wasn't up to date. He also said not to expect any extra characters at all. Only saying that maybe a couple of static critters could be added last minute. Even with the Beaver's simple movements, it's not static.
News - Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress
These are very interesting. And believe it or not, they've actually partially alleviated some of my concerns about there only being 6 AA's. They do indeed look legitimate, and I can imagine it's fairly accurate to the sets they construct. But it's also clear that the renders can't be used to...forums.wdwmagic.com
I don't know what model she is, but I sort of doubt she's a simple moving prop either. that video clip isn't remotely long enough to establish her range of motion.
The post you're referring to, I mention the addition of simplistic figures being added last minute to fill out space, I was correct as usual. The reason the beaver isn't included in this render is because it's a limited motion figure. There are different programming server files that only include the A1000s and ones that include the limited motion figures. Think of it as layers. All figures are programmed individually by a team of 2-4 people. So no they are NOT outdated this is simply one layer of digital figures which is also why the render is all gray. Once all layers are combined we can see the fully fledged out digital scene, full color, all the characters, and animation.
TheCoasterNerd
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
almost certainly not, but there's always a chance they're just leaving him out of all PR to surprise us on opening day. I certainly wouldn't complain
Bayou
Well-Known Member
My animatronic count prediction:
16 human audio animatronics + Louis
18 critter animatronics
5 flamingo animatronics (speculative)
18 more critter animatronics (for finale, speculative)
3 Mostly still human figures (Big Daddy and Queen + King of Meldonia, speculative)
A lot of still frogs
= 60 "animatronics" (rather physical [not reliant on media] realizations of characters)
16 human audio animatronics + Louis
18 critter animatronics
5 flamingo animatronics (speculative)
18 more critter animatronics (for finale, speculative)
3 Mostly still human figures (Big Daddy and Queen + King of Meldonia, speculative)
A lot of still frogs
= 60 "animatronics" (rather physical [not reliant on media] realizations of characters)
Last edited:
BrianLo
Well-Known Member
I think the wrong qualifier was being used. The renders are rather "Incomplete" in terms of animated figures.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
Roseate spoonbills, not flamingos. Sorry for the nitpick. Though apparently people have taken to calling them "cajun flamingos". Didn't realize that.
MerlinTheGoat
Well-Known Member
I used that word in my posts as well, but it was still said the 8 humans and Louis were all we would be getting. Even when pointing out all of the unfilled empty spaces on the building.