mergatroid
Well-Known Member
Seems a bit odd that people are now trying to get 'limited motion' into their posts as though it's a negative?
I mean when we originally got the complaints about AA's being removed and replaced by less AA's (a fair worry), nobody was complaining that many of those removed AA's were fairly 'limited motion'. Now it appears that there's far more AA's (and good ones at that) being put in the attraction than previously thought, it's suddenly as though we're now classing 'limited motion' AA's as not real AA's? At least that's how it reads.
We'll find out when it opens I'm sure but it does appear there's a lot more been done with this attraction than what was expected. Personally I'm really quite excited by it and hopefully will be able to ride it in September this year.
I mean when we originally got the complaints about AA's being removed and replaced by less AA's (a fair worry), nobody was complaining that many of those removed AA's were fairly 'limited motion'. Now it appears that there's far more AA's (and good ones at that) being put in the attraction than previously thought, it's suddenly as though we're now classing 'limited motion' AA's as not real AA's? At least that's how it reads.
We'll find out when it opens I'm sure but it does appear there's a lot more been done with this attraction than what was expected. Personally I'm really quite excited by it and hopefully will be able to ride it in September this year.
Last edited: