ParentsOf4
Well-Known Member
A few clarifications ...So I dont think they have much overhead if they dont sell rooms, they constantly close down blocks to inflate occupancy levels higher. If @ParentsOf4 statistics are correct. Then theres rumors that they count DVC in their stats too.
Now they are way more interested in converting everything in to DVC to keep customers tied. Even if they end going more to UNI and other parks than Disney.
WDW does not "constantly close down blocks of rooms to inflate occupancy". About 4% of rooms are out of service at any time. This appears to be primarily for maintenance and updates.
The number of available room nights does fluctuate beyond that. This appears to be related to room conversions into DVC (e.g. at the Polynesian and Wilderness Lodge).
Disney might seasonally make blocks of rooms unavailable for booking. At many hotels outside of Disney, this is done to reduce costs. (For example, those rooms don't need to be cleaned, air conditioned, etc.) Typically, a room is excluded from available inventory metrics only if it will be out of service for more than 6 months. Thus, these seasonal closings appear to have no effect on what Disney reports on its financial statements for available room nights, even though it could impact the rooms available for you and I to book.
DVC is counted as part of hotel statistics as "2-bedroom villa equivalents". This has two effects.
First, it inflates hotel occupancy slightly because DVC has a very high occupancy rate. But only a few percent because DVC still makes up less than 20% of WDW's available rooms.
Second, it inflates Per Room Guest Spending (PRGS). This is where Disney is playing with the numbers. A Studio and a 1- bedroom villa are counted as a single "room" for PRGS even though they may be occupied by 2 different families.
Last edited: