Star Tours, Princesses, Mermaid, DC gate, Pop Century, and more... Oh My!

Fun2BFree

Active Member
I'm just the opposite. My gut tells me that these decisions are being made in California now and the days of Eisner-esque bare minimums are about to reach a screeching halt. If not, I think it will really start to effect the gate at WDW.
...
Second was fixing DCA which is happening.

DCA's new additions were pushed through just in time before the financial crisis, and has been curbed and hacked off at in any way possible to cut costs. Disney is a company and have to look at the bottom line to please shareholders, especially in the current financial climate. The fabled Disney thriftiness is very much intact.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
DCA's new additions were pushed through just in time before the financial crisis, and has been curbed and hacked off at in any way possible to cut costs. Disney is a company and have to look at the bottom line to please shareholders, especially in the current financial climate. The fabled Disney thriftiness is very much intact.

What I have noticed is that the cutbacks are being done in a way where they could be fixed later. What I am talking about is they are not inclined to green light cut back stuff that we are then stuck with for decades.

And of course the number 1 responsibility should be towards investors. But all the stuff influenced by Iger/Lasseter and signed off by them is QUALITY!

And that is what is most important. Thanks for letting me clarify.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
Can we refrain from coasters in EPCOT? Really, it's so pretty without them. Even the mountains will look out of place.

Exactly! No mountains in WS please. Although I wouldn't mind a low profile log flume ride in Canada that hides the Soarin' building.
 

RSoxNo1

Well-Known Member
You know what's just sad to me?
This:
snow-white-wdw-400-3.jpg

as opposed to this:
disneyland2.jpg

:rolleyes:


My answer to that is the ride itself. The ending of Disneyland's version is the Witch dropping a rock on you, and then you see an open book that says, "and they all lived happily ever after." Happily every after? Yeah, underneath a rock.


It does sound like positive change is coming. The changes that Iger/Lasseter have made to the company as a whole seem to be a focus on quality over quantity. Limiting the number of movie releases and direct to video releases was one of the major steps here. A look at how the $1.2 billion is being allocated at DCA is another. $1.2 billion could build a dozen D/E ticket attractions, but they're using it to spruce up existing attractions, make a few E/E+ attractions, and generally wrap together the entire park into a more cohesive theme. They could have just as easily taken that $1.2 billion cloned a bunch of other attractions, forced them into that park and called it a day.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
My answer to that is the ride itself. The ending of Disneyland's version is the Witch dropping a rock on you, and then you see an open book that says, "and they all lived happily ever after." Happily every after? Yeah, underneath a rock.


It does sound like positive change is coming. The changes that Iger/Lasseter have made to the company as a whole seem to be a focus on quality over quantity. Limiting the number of movie releases and direct to video releases was one of the major steps here. A look at how the $1.2 billion is being allocated at DCA is another. $1.2 billion could build a dozen D/E ticket attractions, but they're using it to spruce up existing attractions, make a few E/E+ attractions, and generally wrap together the entire park into a more cohesive theme. They could have just as easily taken that $1.2 billion cloned a bunch of other attractions, forced them into that park and called it a day.

Well said. I just wish everyone could see the "big picture" of what Iger/Lasseter have done in an incredibly short ammount of time. And it's just a matter of time before WDW gets their attention. I'm very confident of that.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Let's try and make some sense with all the pixie dust flying around ... RIGHT NOW NOTHING is coming to the MK or DAK for that matter (hence, Joe Rohde being moved to the Grand Hawaiian project). It was that or he'd have likely gone elsewhere when the boutique animal park was killed.

Anyhow ... we all know Star Tours 2.0 is eventually coming to FLA ... and the Monsters coaster as well at Studios ... but beyond that?

Again ... right now ... NOTHING ... it's great that the chatter in the fan/online community is on high because it's summer, Disney isn't doing much of substance in the USA beyond DCA and WDI did just invite a group of CMs up there who aren't good at keeping their mouths shut (which is likely part of the plan by those who want to gain traction by pointing out how stale ... how soulless MK has become due to inept, greedy management ... knowing if they show all those kewl models and renderings off, someone is going to shout their mouth off to various webmasters ... and guess what? They have!)

I did want to comment on the following:

There is no concept of the carousel going anywhere. Dumbo would possibly move, but not the carousel. The castle courtyard idea already exists in theory, and the changes would simply solidify the theme that's already there. In fact, the courtyard idea was part of FL's plan back when WDW was being built; Dorothea Redmond worked on the concept.

Exactly. Thanks. Dumbo would move. But not that far. Tea Party would move as well. NOTHING in ANY plans would move the Carousel. It's all about adding texture and detail to the area ... and making way for the massive showbuilding Mermaid would require.

This list does seem like a list of rumors, but the rumors exist because plans have floated around at various times. Make no mistake, Toontown in its present form IS going away. The land is too valuable to ignore, and the plans have changed many times over the last ten years. It's a matter of WHEN and HOW—and nothing seems to be moving right now.

That's just the thing ... there's plenty of real estate open in MK ... so many dead zones. And Toontown may blow, but they want to keep the core concept. That's been one of the 'issues' with the Fantasyland plans to begin with because they would eat up a chunk of Mickey's Tentland.

And again, I agree ... NOTHING is happening now.

There is no land behind the Pinocchio Village Haus, just a nearly 3-story drop to the tunnel entrance.

Yes. But why spoil delusion with fact?

~~~~~

Plans do exist, and WDI is working hard to push several fantastic projects through in the MK. Everybody, including execs, knows that the park suffers capacity issues; but certain individuals are unwilling to press the "Go" button to get this stuff done. Poor management? Oh, yes.

Sure. It starts with the stranglehold Jay Rasulo has on WDI and P&R. He has been incredibly savvy in his efforts to weed out anyone who isn't one of his people. And that filtered down from major guys 'resigning' from WDI to execs that took 'buy-outs' earlier to even mid-level park ops managers who were axed in the recent bloodletting.

It's a power play by one guy who has no magic and appreciates creativity as much as Sarah Palin appreciates David Letterman.

Unlike Michael Eisner, new Sheriff Iger is very hands-off and so long as Jay delivers numbers he isn't likely to step in no matter what happens to the parks.


I know some people have accused a certain Mac Sandwich at the happy boards of proclaiming that nothing's coming to the MK, but that's not what he said. He said that the plans DO exist, but they haven't received the full greenlight. That corresponds to the information that many others, including our Lee and Martin, have received. We need to keep hoping that Lassetter and others ignore "As-long-as-it's-a-timeshare-I'm-happy-because-I-don't-know-what-the-he11-I'm-doing" Rasulo and push the plans forward.


Lee MacDonald and I don't see eye to eye to many things (again, I wish some of the more intelligent voices here had witnessed some of our battles) but the man is very 'in' with Disney at a high level. Often we butted heads because he spun things a certain way (he still has a fascination with Tom Fitzgerald and a hatred of Tony Baxter I don't quite get ... and he is very well known on his own site for proclaiming the opinion -- and he is entitled to it -- that he prefers DCA to TDS).

BUT HE KNOWS HIS STUFF.

When he says that Eric Jacobson's team has had a $500 million plan for Fantasyland for over two years, I believe that. Not just because he says it but because I know there have been plans (the number I had heard was $350 million, which was shocking enough.)

I don't know anyone (or anyone I respect) that is saying there aren't plans. But what you need to realize is there are always plans. That's what all those coffee table books that all the fanbois buy are for ... all the plans that happened, happened in a different form or very often ... didn't happen at all.

When Leemac says that it is ALL BLUE SKY at this point, I sadly defer to that because: 1.) I know nothing to the contrary from my sources; and 2.) WDW management is more conservative than the typical FOX News watcher in the best of times; and 3.) These are most definitely not the best of times; and 4.) Disney seems to feel that timeshares are the reason people visit WDW.

So while this thread can go on for 500 pages, I'll be back at the LP later trying to discern what is really going on (or not).
 

EPCOT Explorer

New Member
Let's try and make some sense with all the pixie dust flying around ... RIGHT NOW NOTHING is coming to the MK or DAK for that matter (hence, Joe Rohde being moved to the Grand Hawaiian project). It was that or he'd have likely gone elsewhere when the boutique animal park was killed.

Anyhow ... we all know Star Tours 2.0 is eventually coming to FLA ... and the Monsters coaster as well at Studios ... but beyond that?

Again ... right now ... NOTHING ... it's great that the chatter in the fan/online community is on high because it's summer, Disney isn't doing much of substance in the USA beyond DCA and WDI did just invite a group of CMs up there who aren't good at keeping their mouths shut (which is likely part of the plan by those who want to gain traction by pointing out how stale ... how soulless MK has become due to inept, greedy management ... knowing if they show all those kewl models and renderings off, someone is going to shout their mouth off to various webmasters ... and guess what? They have!)

I did want to comment on the following:



Exactly. Thanks. Dumbo would move. But not that far. Tea Party would move as well. NOTHING in ANY plans would move the Carousel. It's all about adding texture and detail to the area ... and making way for the massive showbuilding Mermaid would require.



That's just the thing ... there's plenty of real estate open in MK ... so many dead zones. And Toontown may blow, but they want to keep the core concept. That's been one of the 'issues' with the Fantasyland plans to begin with because they would eat up a chunk of Mickey's Tentland.

And again, I agree ... NOTHING is happening now.



Yes. But why spoil delusion with fact?



Sure. It starts with the stranglehold Jay Rasulo has on WDI and P&R. He has been incredibly savvy in his efforts to weed out anyone who isn't one of his people. And that filtered down from major guys 'resigning' from WDI to execs that took 'buy-outs' earlier to even mid-level park ops managers who were axed in the recent bloodletting.

It's a power play by one guy who has no magic and appreciates creativity as much as Sarah Palin appreciates David Letterman.

Unlike Michael Eisner, new Sheriff Iger is very hands-off and so long as Jay delivers numbers he isn't likely to step in no matter what happens to the parks.





Lee MacDonald and I don't see eye to eye to many things (again, I wish some of the more intelligent voices here had witnessed some of our battles) but the man is very 'in' with Disney at a high level. Often we butted heads because he spun things a certain way (he still has a fascination with Tom Fitzgerald and a hatred of Tony Baxter I don't quite get ... and he is very well known on his own site for proclaiming the opinion -- and he is entitled to it -- that he prefers DCA to TDS).

BUT HE KNOWS HIS STUFF.

When he says that Eric Jacobson's team has had a $500 million plan for Fantasyland for over two years, I believe that. Not just because he says it but because I know there have been plans (the number I had heard was $350 million, which was shocking enough.)

I don't know anyone (or anyone I respect) that is saying there aren't plans. But what you need to realize is there are always plans. That's what all those coffee table books that all the fanbois buy are for ... all the plans that happened, happened in a different form or very often ... didn't happen at all.

When Leemac says that it is ALL BLUE SKY at this point, I sadly defer to that because: 1.) I know nothing to the contrary from my sources; and 2.) WDW management is more conservative than the typical FOX News watcher in the best of times; and 3.) These are most definitely not the best of times; and 4.) Disney seems to feel that timeshares are the reason people visit WDW.

So while this thread can go on for 500 pages, I'll be back at the LP later trying to discern what is really going on (or not).
So...Saying that, what's the money for? They have plans to spend it, obviously. Nothing new, attractions wise, so...Maybe they want to do the visual look of FL over before they fix the attractions? Or even refurbs?


That would work.:wave:

Sorry if you mentioned it somewhere else in there, that just stood out with a little theory I had been thinking of. ;)
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
I'm just the opposite. My gut tells me that these decisions are being made in California now and the days of Eisner-esque bare minimums are about to reach a screeching halt. If not, I think it will really start to effect the gate at WDW.

Maybe that's your problem, JT. Your gut isn't your thinking organ.

And the trashing of Eisner is very absurd. Go look at DLP ... or TDS ... or even DAK if you think Eisner was about the bare minium. Look at things like ToT or Indy and Splash Mtn etc ... if you believe that.

And the big calls have ALWAYS been made in Burbank and will ALWAYS.

Do you really think Phil Holmes gets to decide half a billion projects ... or even Inoverherheadmeg the figurehead?

All the evidence shows that Iger/Lasseter are fixing these problems one at a time. First was aquiring and keeping Pixar running at full speed. Second was fixing DCA which is happening. Third was fixing Disney Animation, which definitely seems to be happening. Fourth was getting "Disney Travel" up to speed including all it's divisions (incl. DVC's at WDW) which has and is happening, and 5th, I believe, will be fixing problems at WDW theme parks.

No, it doesn't. Iger bought Pixar because it was a no-brainer. Ten films, ten financial successes, ten creative successes ... content for parks and consumer products, not to mention Lasseter and Sacred Seven.

Fixing Animation wouldn't have been needed if the same bad choices being made by P&R/WDI now weren't made back then.

And to use your post listing WDW as the fifth priorty is beyond sad if you believe it. ... It's the flagship resort. They tout the MK as No. 1 in the world (even when it's likely 2-3 most years) yet let it get stale and negelcted. Yet you think when they take care of all of the above, which will take another decade btw, then they'll get to WDW.

Silly fanboi ... in another decade no one from Iger to Rasulo to WDW's exec 'leadership' team will still be working for the company ... they'll be off spending their millions and leaving a legacy of waste, neglect and ruin in their wake for others to clean up.

Not sure where all the doubt comes from. I know there is an epidemic of "I want it now because I want it now" out there.

Quality and instant gradification are mutually exclusive.

I'd rather wait and get quality any day. :)

Well, since WDW hasn't added an e-Ticket to MK since 1992 ... hasn't had a signifcant addition since T-Land 94/95 ... you can apparently wait indefinitely.

Disney parks aren't supposed to grow stale and tired.
 

WDW1974

Well-Known Member
Well said. I just wish everyone could see the "big picture" of what Iger/Lasseter have done in an incredibly short ammount of time. And it's just a matter of time before WDW gets their attention. I'm very confident of that.


If you came off smarter then I might think you were working for WDW's Social Media Department ... like I said ... if ...

(oh and I love John ... but he's struggling just trying to get anything new built across from the Extreme Makeover Theme Park Edition ... WDW might as well as be Mars on his radar)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom