tigsmom said:
I have nothing against change, but if something is working (and it must be because the place is always full) then why change? I would have no problem with different polynesian foods being introduced, but au gratin potatoes do not remind me of polynesian food. Sorry.
I guess I should be more clear.
I agree with you.:wave:
I heard for years that change was good (regardless of the changes), and that several like-minded individuals were blowing things out of proportion. We were attacked for saying that Disneyland wasn't nearly as "Magical" as it used to be, that the people in charge
knew better than we did, and that Burbank was
never wrong. Cynthia Harriss would bring financial "Sensibility" to Disneyland, and that we were over-reacting.
We weren't. Burbank
didn't know better, and the Pressler/Harriss team nearly destroyed Disneyland. Yes, destroyed.
I'm not saying that's what's happenig today at WDW...far from it. If it were I wouldn't be flying my family to stay on property for a week this Saturday.
But some people need to realize that questioning
why Disney makes some of the decisions it does isn't the sign of a bitter malcontent. That there's nothing wrong with questioning menu changes. That there's nothing wrong with lamenting yet another merchandising location or meet and greet. That there's nothing wrong with wondering why story has sometimes been replaced by expediancy. Not always, and not to the exclusion of recognizing the things that are being done right, and the things that keep people like myself spending many thousands of Dollars each year on their products.
But contrary to the opinion of some here, there's nothing wrong with asking
why?
Some of us have, after all, been right before.