jt04
Well-Known Member
here's where you lose me. no one is saying that.
critics of WDW are holding it to its own standard, set by WDW itself back in the early '80s to the mid '90s.
they are then saying that universal recognizes that the disney-of-old business model works (obviously), and are embracing it by building innovative, immersive attractions and experiences. something travelers are responding to, as supported by the soaring IOA attendance numbers.
as a result, disney fans want WDW to get back to their roots.
you hear: OMG GUYS DISNEY IS SO BAD AND UNI ROCKS HARD!
listen, i don't get overly negative on WDW, just because i enjoy it and it's a family favorite and it's still very good. but it's willful blindness to not walk past a closed wonders of life, a laughable JOI, a half-refurbed space mountain, the ghost of alien encounter, a broken yeti, and other glaring holes and not realize this is an inferior product to what i got for (less) money in... say 1994.
The so-called critis always fail to account for the massive hole WDW was allowed to fall into. Almost every problem you mention was due to previous mismanagement and lack of focus. It is obvious that is no longer the case but they refuse to acknowledge that. It has become more than childish.
And I am somewhat suprised this thread has been allowed to devolve into another excuse to bash WDW without merit or facts.