Mike S
Well-Known Member
My votes for Sleeping Beauty mostly because I want the Dragon.Now if they could scrap Princess Fairytale Hall for a new dark ride.
My votes for Sleeping Beauty mostly because I want the Dragon.Now if they could scrap Princess Fairytale Hall for a new dark ride.
This was posted by Disney this evening. Not very specific.
Message:
With Anna and Elsa moving to Royal Sommerhus at Epcot in June, Princess Fairytale Hall will continue offering advance FastPass+ selections to meet the princesses through early June. More dates will be available for that timeframe. We look forward to sharing an opening date soon for Royal Sommerhus.
As a reminder, Royal Sommerhus at Epcot will be the new place where Guests can meet Anna and Elsa in person; however, they will continue to visit Magic Kingdom daily to appear in Disney Festival of Fantasy Parade and the upcoming Mickey’s Royal Friendship Faire show at Cinderella Castle.
To this day, I don't understand why they haven't cloned over Pinocchio's Daring Journey.Now if they could scrap Princess Fairytale Hall for a new dark ride.
That's what I did say.I thought that Martin had confirmed that the attraction did use the effect for a short amount of time. @marni1971?
It still amazes me they couldn't have tested the RoL "new technology" elsewhere way prior to opening dates to be sure it worked before designing the show on it.
Couldn't or just didn't?
"Testing isn't cheap" - Chappie
Maelstrom was, to me, like a low-budget indie film. They didn't have a lot of space or money to work with, but did the best they could with what they were given.
We talk about Everest or The Mummy at Universal being cool because you stop and go backwards...but Maelstrom did it first! Plus you got the basics of the adventure, vikings, trolls, waterfalls, Valhalla, polar creatures and then modern oil rigs and a nice village port at the end.
If you compare it to Fantasyland Dark rides of that era, it really is about on par with them IMO.
Would've been perfect for Storybook Circus instead of those tents.To this day, I don't understand why they haven't cloned over Pinocchio's Daring Journey.
Would've been perfect for Storybook Circus instead of those tents.
Well there is video evidence of something there that's definitely not the lightening stick. What is it?I worked on the ride and there was 2 people on the maintenance-department of the ride who been working there since the opening in 1988, both say there was never a tesla coil installed in the North Sea-scene. So I believe that Martin´s video is wrong.
Heres from Paul Torrigino, who worked on the making of the ride back in the 80´s:
"While the figures and sets were in production, the special effects were also being worked out. During the model-making phase, we worked with Jim Mulder from the special effects department, who was assigned to our ride. Jim was probably the best of the new generation of special effects guys around and we were really lucky to have him. So as we were coming up with the ideas, we would talk it over with Jim and he would take our initial idea and expand on it. The biggest effects challenge of the ride was creating the storm in the oil rig scene at the end of the ride, and he was up to it.
Jim had a lot of ideas on how to do it, and early on he thought about using a giant Tesla coil to make real lightning! Somehow he got a hold of a guy who specialized in artificial lightning and he did a mock-up for us.
For a few days, they took over the new metal shed building built to house the Star Tours simulator mock-ups and he set up this giant Tesla coil metal column thing about 10 feet high or so with a big metal ball on top of it. He would fire it up and there would be an explosion with a 15-foot bolt of lightning shooting out and crashing into one of several receptacles in the corners of the room.
It was quite shocking (pun intended), frightening and loud! That day you could hear the explosions all over the Imagineering property. Great effect, but no one could figure out how to pull it off without electrocuting people, since our vehicles were boats in real water! So we didn't get to use the effect." - https://www.mouseplanet.com/7131/Walt_Disney_Worlds_Maelstrom_Part_1
Well there is video evidence of something there that's definitely not the lightening stick. What is it?
update from another site:
1) The boats did make the suspect curve.
2) But, the boats were empty, thus riding "high", and avoiding the angle of the boat hull sides.
3) The next trial is to load them with people and see if they still make the bend.
4) Still no date for soft or hard opening . . . much like Rivers of Light, several technical issues need to be resolved.
technical issues here as well? sigh
If Disney's engineering and project planning is so incompetent these days that they have no idea if a boat will make a turn before putting it in the water weeks before they are about to open and if it doesn't work and they have to redo this, heads should roll. It still amazes me they couldn't have tested the RoL "new technology" elsewhere way prior to opening dates to be sure it worked before designing the show on it.
Do the people responsible for some of the projects in today's WDW just have no clue or common sense whatsoever?
I do not necessarily jump to the conclusion that Disney imagineering is incompetent, and have no ideas how to make boats (Both in Frozen and RoL). I applaud the efforts to try something different, new, and work the problems to get it right. I would much rather pursue pushing the envelope of something new, that could result in delays in projects, than to get recycled proven technology and show over and over again.
Hopefully it eventually gets a worthy area renovation to actually make it worth it to go back there.that is one area (with the exception of dumbo and barnstormer which were already there) that just screams "well we have this space remaining we have to fill and we only have 10 bucks, what should we do?
Incredible.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.