Biff215
Well-Known Member
I know you're not asking me, but why not build a new attraction, while keeping the old one? It's clearly not popular with Disney these days, just see what's about to happen to GMR.
-
The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More -
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Mission:Space update (confirmed)
- Thread starter BEARSHOUSE4
- Start date
Kamikaze
Well-Known Member
DLR is different than WDW, though. They don't have the room to just continuously add attractions. In almost every case, in order to put something in, something has to come out.
Biff215
Well-Known Member
Agreed, but that's not a reason to just shove something in where it doesn't belong and affects the entire park.
Kamikaze
Well-Known Member
How well did the theme of ToT really fit the rest of the park?
In this area they have the room. And will do in the future. So IMHO they didn't have to tear anything down nor shoehorn another IP in.
Kman101
Well-Known Member
While Hollywood Land is disjointed as is, how did the Hollywood Tower Hotel NOT fit Hollywood? So Guardians fits better? No it does not. Now when they rename it Marvel Land, or whatever they want to call it, then maybe it fits, but then it won't fit the theme of Disney CALIFORNIA Adventure ... you seem to like to argue about a lot of stuff ...
Kamikaze
Well-Known Member
He commented on 'the entire park', not Hollywoodland. Don't get me wrong, Tower at WDW is my favorite attraction. But 'Hollywoodland' as an area when the actual thing is 45ish minutes north is kind of silly, and the 'land' was just basically a catch-all for the other attractions they wanted to put in. In reality, they should just drop the land name and not label it at all.
Commenting on something is not an argument, by the way. You can consider what I'm doing with little miss sunshine an argument.
Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
Suuuure...
Biff215
Well-Known Member
Have you seen the pictures? It certainly affects much of DCA, and even the entire DLR to some extent.
DCA itself was considered silly as a theme when it opened, so Hollywoodland is no different. Tower could and would have stayed if the higher-ups weren't so obsessed with getting Marvel into the parks.
Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
Or pirate them. It's one of the biggest reasons why comics have a hard time expanding their audience.
There's a reason why the Free Comic Book Day Spongebob book went off on the industry in its first page...
AHEM...
http://readcomiconline.to/
YOU WELCOME
trainplane3
Well-Known Member
So can we expect new screens and a updated video that doesn't look like a PS1 game? The future part you mention is interesting but I'm not sure what to even guess about that.
As far as I know the visuals should be updated yes.
trainplane3
Well-Known Member
Neato! Any possible changes to the Sim itself? Its never bothered me but would they be tweaking the intensity of it? Or is it just going to be a "new video and general maintenance" sort of deal?
There should be other ride experience changes.
Haymarket2008
Well-Known Member
Will it remain IP-less?