No I'm saying they are completely different rides themed to completely different locations on the globe.
In Matterhorn its an Abominable Snowman, Everest is the Yeti. Everest has a completely different theme, and its more of a mine train coaster on steroids.
http://www.scottware.com.au/theme/images/tracks/trk_ak_everest.jpg
Matterhorn: http://rcdb.com/200.htm
Everest: http://rcdb.com/2389.htm
Clearly different. Matterhorn has a ton of differences. Single seating (which im sure if it came here it would be 2 across for capacity) use of water as brakes instead of having to trim the ride which trims kill coasters. And most of all its a open feel.
The fact that you need to go to such lengths to make your point on a Disney message board speaks volumes, IMO.
Fans may see the difference--some only after having it meticulously explained to them. But your run-of-the-mill Walt Disney World day guest would look at it and think "a rollercoaster in a snow-topped mountain...we went on that yesterday at the other park...what a ripoff."
We're talking about a psuedo-clone of another WDW attraction and a literal clone of a DL attraction. Don't need it. New ideas!!!