Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
AND NOT GO TO DISNEY? R U CRAZY?!
Disney is the best. period. I'm not spending ALL my vacation time at a dirty, ugly place like Universal where none of the movies interest me.
#Mickey4Life
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
Marvel coming to WDW?!?!
- Thread starter WDW1974
- Start date
AND NOT GO TO DISNEY? R U CRAZY?!
Disney is the best. period. I'm not spending ALL my vacation time at a dirty, ugly place like Universal where none of the movies interest me.
#Mickey4Life
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
Oh, sweetie, come to the dark side. We have cookies.....and benches...in the shade
Jwhee
Well-Known Member
*When the stupidity is so stupid you just face palm through your own face*
Animaniac93-98
Well-Known Member
Oh, sweetie, come to the dark side. We have cookies.....and benches...in the shade
Cookies? No way. I'm all about the cupcakes and Dole Whip.
It's why I'll gladly spend $89 + tax for Elsa & Olaf's Beaches 'n Cream Dessert Decorating Hour.
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
Funny you should mention cupcakes. I got this one the other night at Uni.
And Menchies in CityWalk has the Dole Whip.
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
At this point, Disney should just pretend MSHI/IOA/Potter/USF is a WDW upcharge activity. Like UOR is WDW's boutique resort.
Seriously, a one day Uni Park to Park is about the same as the $150 3 hour MK thing.
Let that sink in for a min.
Seriously, a one day Uni Park to Park is about the same as the $150 3 hour MK thing.
Let that sink in for a min.
Last edited:
AEfx
Well-Known Member
Isn't that crazy? I think I pointed that out somewhere around here during this discussion.
So, basically, you could spend an entire day doing BOTH parks at Universal Orlando, or for $50 more, TWO days, for the same price as Disney is charging for this 3-hour nonsense (formerly known as "standard operating hours").
PizzaPlanet
Well-Known Member
So what you are saying is if Universal wanted to, they could have rethemed the Spider Man Ride to be based on the Tobey Maguire or Andrew Garfield Spiderman? It just seems odd how they would be allowed to base an attraction off of movies made by other studios without their permission, even if it is Marvel. However, let's not forget that The Incredible Hulk (2008) was actually distributed by Universal, and is part of the MCU. So there could be some leniency there in regards to the connecting the Hulk coaster to the MCU.
Launchpad McQuack
Well-Known Member
The issue with that Hulk movie now is that they don't use the same actor or Hulk design anymore.
danlb_2000
Premium Member
The contract only says that the characters must true to what is in the Marvel Style Guide, so if the MCU depictions are in the style guide I don't see why Uni wouldn't be able to use them. Now if they get into the likenesses of the actual actors who played the roles in the MCU, then that might get into other legal issues.
Ford won with his likeness for the Indy EMV ride so it wouldn't be the first time.
AEfx
Well-Known Member
I believe that was because of the type of original contract he signed for the Indy films. He couldn't, say, deny his likeness in anything Star Wars, because his likeness as Han Solo was purchased by Lucasfilm in perpetuity (as Carrie FIsher jokes, she has to play a couple of bucks every time she looks in the mirror, LOL). That was uncommon back then.
After Nicholson took everyone to the cleaners over Batman, though, (estimates as of last year are that he has made over 100M from appearing in the '89 Batman film because of his points and merchandising interests), they pretty much make everyone who does a genre/comic film sign their lives (well, likenesses) completely away in terms of portraying that character. They aren't signed if they don't sign, so to speak.
I'd be willing to bet that Marvel/Disney can do anything they darn well please with the likenesses of any of the MCU actors - or they wouldn't have gotten the parts. There is a remote possibility that Downey has some sort of approval, but at best it would be some sort of a "50/50 denial deal" (as in, they show him ten pictures, he has to approve at least half of them, etc. - he can't just withhold). But even then - given how Iron Man is actually a CGI creation, it really would only be Tony Stark unmasked he would even have a say in.
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Dole Whips with marshmallow on top.
I think money would be a bigger issue with the specific actors.
Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
the suit is black, the shading for black is usually purple in comics.
Cesar R M
Well-Known Member
something like this?
so bad that you grow an additional finger to cause additional facepalm damage.
Or a classic powered up...
Kate F
Well-Known Member
You guys know he was being sarcastic, right?something like this?
so bad that you grow an additional finger to cause additional facepalm damage.
View attachment 140780
Or a classic powered up...
Mike S
Well-Known Member
KABOOM!
Ant-Man? First I'm hearing anyone say that. What I would want: Adventure Thru Inner Space with Ant-Man.
What we'll get: it's a small world with Ant-Man.
Thats something that kind of bothers me. The original Hulk design from TIH actually still looked human while the new one seen in Avengers seems to look more like an ape or something.
Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
Uh-huh. They've only had FOUR years to build an Avengers ride. Meanwhile, people complained when a Frozen show debuted the summer after the film's release.
Disneyhead'71
Well-Known Member
Well, they do have 2 E Tickets in that park under construction right now, and one of them IS an Avenger E Ticket.Uh-huh. They've only had FOUR years to build an Avengers ride. Meanwhile, people complained when a Frozen show debuted the summer after the film's release.