Getting back on topic, today's MiceAge update talks about the DCA version of Tower and how unless Shanghai bombs the Guardians will come this fall in time for a May debut. No mention of Florida's version.
Just for clarification's sake nothing is OWNED by Universal. Universal pays Disney/Marvel a fee for an exclusive use license.Dr. Strange is owned by Universal for theme park rights.
Also said the marvel coaster is on pace for 2020 and won't be going in the Timon parking lot but rather the monsters inc area.Getting back on topic, today's MiceAge update talks about the DCA version of Tower and how unless Shanghai bombs the Guardians will come this fall in time for a May debut. No mention of Florida's version.
I'll rest my case here. I see a bit of truth to both my and your perspectives. Just depends on how you look at it I think.Star Tours 2.0 was a very well executed upgrade / reminagineering / overhaul / what ever you want to call it.
It certainly isn't a whole new attraction. Which isn't a bad thing in this case.
I'd love to see a state of the art Hulk AA figure one day... should just keep waiting.The MiceAge article mentioning Monsters Inc getting turned into a Marvel ride is making me imagine a "Super Hero Star Limo" and that the Drew Carey that still exists under the CTA costuming will be redressed as Hulk and the redressed Jackie Chan figure will become Spider-Man.
Maybe in Universal's rumored Avengers ride.I'd love to see a state of the art Hulk AA figure one day... should just keep waiting.
That's adorable. Comparing Dreamworks to Pixar is a bit like comparing TNA to WWE.
Is Star Tours still Star Tours, vehicles and all?Aside from BASIC theme and ride vehicles, everything else has changed. The ride takes place between III and IV instead of after VI, has a far sleeker aesthetics, in 3D, C-3PO as the pilot instead of Captain Rex, and completely different altenrnating show scenes. I could go on, but I think you get the idea. In my eyes, a refurbishment can update a ride in major ways, but the experience as a whole has to remain fundamentally the same. And example of this would be the Haunted Mansion. While the stair scene replaced the spider scene, the ride's basic story experience remains unchanged in an overall radical way. Star Tours saw enough radical change where the ride has a new subtitle and its own separate Wikipedia article. I know its not the most official source, but enough differences for there to be seperate, individual articles should say something. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Tours_–_The_Adventures_Continue
If anything, they should be glad to know that most everyone thinks it's a stupid idea before they proceed(ed).
How can they be furious about that? Or are they so hardheaded on the idea, they were attempting damage control by keeping it under wraps?
How is this a good idea in their heads? Destroy the Tower and the Monsters Inc ride and the entire Hollywoodland concept? I do not understand.
I assume they are mad it got leaked as then, they had no control over the message. Companies always want to be in control of the messaging of a new or potential product.
Oh.. completely ignoring the reception of the idea. Right.
Not permanently necessarily. They can't afford to sacrifice capacity. If it flops at DCA, we won't have to suffer it. But if it somehow does well out west...ehhh..maybe, maybe not. It seems the idea to do this at WDW has gone...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.