Try explaining the concept to a newbie from start to finish, and tell me which concept they grasp quicker
Let's see...
When you get to the park, head to one of the kiosks.. from there you can pick the attractions you don't want to wait on line for, and it will suggest times for you. If you don't like those times, you can customize them. When the time comes your your reservation, head to the attraction. Oh, you can do this on your smartphone too.
Not so difficult a concept to understand. Certainly more straight forward than "get a FP", yes you can get another FP, but not until your assigned time or 2hrs later.. whichever comes first. Where do you get a FP? At the attraction? No you can't get FPs for other attractions right now, you must wait. Yes you must goto the attraction to get the FP, even tho you aren't planning on riding right now. No you can't say when you want to ride.. you accept what they give you. How many can you get? It depends on the times and how active you are, etc.
3 FP per day... get them at once place... get it on your phone if you want. Dead simple.
Legacy Fastpass was getting a ticket at a deli counter. Fastpass+ involves linking your tickets to your Fastpass+ reservations, selecting the preferred attractions, then selecting one of four groupings. There are multiple steps in the new process that are inevitable because it's a system capable of more. Moreover, while the old process was certainly more tedius, you're repeating the same basic process. That's a lot easier for a newbie to grasp.
There are more customizations, but the average user isn't burdened with them unless they want them. Linking of tickets is a one time task that will pull back over time as the stuff becomes more mainstream and you have things setup ahead of time.
The point I was making (apparently not well enough) was that the actual distribution/acquisition of the Fastpasses themselves isn't why the system is fundamentally flawed. The reason why it's flawed is because of the new rules for acquiring them (60 days out, 3 per day) and what's available (shows and rides that simply don't need it).
It's what you don't like - not what's flawed. There's a difference.
This was said for my comment, "The fundamental flaw in the system is that it can only work for all guests if those guests acquire Fastpasses for things that don't need it." The pool of attractions at every park but the Magic Kingdom was insufficient to satisfy the 3 Fastpasses per day for every guest
A premise that would have made the old FP system 'fundamentally flawed' as well. If you argue there isn't enough capacity for 3 FPs per guest... that hasn't changed.. but in fact 'improves' that metric by adding more FP attractions. So if you want to cut FP+ off at the knees over 'it cant work for all guests for the attractions they wanted' - you should have been ing on the predecessor too, because it couldn't do it either, and was even LESS equipped to do it.
So since you've declared this as "bunkus", please enlighten me. Tell me why Fastpass has been added to shows and attractions that rarely have waits over 10 minutes? If you convince me that this is for any reason other than, "We need the capacity to meet the desired numbers of Fastpass+ reservations per guest," I'll stop any and all Fastpass+ arguments on my end. That means no more whining about it on here, no more MiceChat articles, and no more complaining on podcasts. Please, convince me. I want to be wrong about this.
First, one should look at what I said was bunkus.. and try replying to that. But you were replying to my point about showing other angles your 'suggestions' failed to include. So no idea.
Second... here's a painfully obvious 'reason' to add FP to those attractions. You simply want more of your attractions in the online system. Not because you think people need to shorten their waits - but you want them in the tool period so your quiver looks more full and so you don't penalize attractions for being left out.
So you don't have to explain to dumb richard on the phone or at the kiosk "Yes sir, there are more than 5 rides in the park, but we only allow you to reserve those 5"
So you don't have to argue with dumb richard "Yes sir, there is a Mickey movie... but you don't need to cut the line because there isn't normally a line.."
Not every action is about the highest optimization of efficiency. There are aspects such as marketing, positioning, and simple influencing behavior. Yes, getting people to 'burn' a FP on attractions they might not otherwise need it is a waste for the advanced user, but not all users are advanced. Not every user knows when the best time to hit an attraction is.. nor should they need to. The FP system allows them to simply NOT CARE... freeing up the burden.
People moan about 'why do I want a FP for lunch' or whatever.. then turn around and complain about the long line.. or M&Gs.. and then turn around and post for 30 pages on what's the best time to see the Frozen characters.
For the super-user.. FP+ isn't needed for all things, they know of more efficient ways of doing it than FP+ offers at times. But that isn't for everyone... FP+ offers more than just shorter lines for these people. It's a guide, it simplifies the 'when/where' discussion, its a promotion tool for Disney, etc.
That's the thing, there is no comparison to what they're doing. Look at Fastpass for shows for example: Showtime is at 1:00 PM, Fastpass return time is 12:40-12:55, you can walk in the standby line for that show during that window and sit in the exact same spot for the show. More importantly, you can walk in at 12:56 and still get into the show. Without preferred seating, Fastpass for shows will cost a guest time, not save them time. Looking at attractions that have lower popularity, Fastpass+ is likely to save less than 5 minutes in many cases. Once again, selling something that you don't need.
Doesn't match my experience for Nemo, F!, etc. The same can be said for TLM or Muppets when things are busy. But hey, if you don't feel you need a FP for an attraction - don't use it. In your examples the FP user isn't hurting you any either, since there was spare capacity that it didn't matter which line you went into, so why is it a negative for anyone?
The kiosks may eliminate the confusion of a Fastpass machine being no where near the attraction, but it still involves a multi step process. It also doesn't tell you that while Fastpass is available for Mickey's PhilharMagic, it's not really needed
Because you are dealing with a BUSINESS - not your best friend trying to tell you how to optimize your trip. Why is this hard to grasp? Disney is promoting attractions (just like they did with Bonus FPs) to try to entice people to go there. It's in Disney's interest (and everyone's to a degree) to ensure all attractions are being utilized... Not just a handful. To only put the most popular attractions into the online system would in fact re-enforce the problem of unequal usage. It's akin to the Bonus FP, or putting an attraction on the backside of the map handout.. attempts to promote the attraction so it's capacity is used.
Comparatively, my "man crush
@lentesta" has contributed to a system that allows you to select as many attractions as you want, hit the optimize button and it will re-order those attractions so that you're touring in the most efficient way possible
And yet, he still offers 'pre-made' touring plans for the type of visitor you are too... why? Because again some people need the 'show me the turn key way' and aren't looking for max optimization.
Sure, that's not for everyone, but it is still far superior than what Disney is trying to do and it can utilize Disney's ever changing system
Depending on what you are trying to accomplish. Disney's objectives and TP's are not the same... they aren't motivated by the same things, nor do they measure their success the same.
TAs you said, Fastpass+ is intended to accomplish more than getting an individual on a ride in a shorter amount of time. However, it is not been my experience that this is at all beneficial.
Again.. depends on whose chair you are sitting in.
I know it's hard for people to grasp at times... but not everything is done solely for the customer. Neither extreme is good for the end game of either party.