I tottally agree with you. I think some people on this board are being ridiculous by calling the OPs parenting skills into question here. I'm sorry we don't all walk on water.
my daughter was injured, unfortunately due to Disney's Negligence..
DISNEY WAS AT FAULT, THE DOOR WAS BROKEN.
Once again, Disney is at fault... Sorry, I am quick to defend them against the wrongful death, and frivilous lawsuits, but this is a case where they are negligent.
The guy was not at fault, Disney was... I've said this multiple times, perhaps you missed it?
To those of you that say I could have prevented it.. It happened in about 1 to 1.5 SECONDS.. Unless you are superman, the flash, or a really suped-up delorian, it could NOT have been prevented UNLESS Disney had a properly maintained and functional door closer mech on the door..
and one last time.. I was inches from my daughter went in happened.. The door shut like a friggin steel trap... which is why is supposed to have the door closer on it in the first place..
I think some people are missing the point.
It seems to me the point he is trying to make is that he should have no blame in the situation and Disney should have full blame. That's what his above posts imply. But my argument is, as a parent, you shouldn't always count on mechanics when it comes to keeping your kids safe.
I'm not saying he's an irresponsible parent (as I said in my post, my daughter gets hurt every other second because she's such a klutz and I can't ever stay on top of it), but when she does get hurt I take full responsibility for it.
ok here how i see what happen. it is sad that your little girl was hurt. i am single dad of a little girl. if she was as close to as you stated why didn't you reach for the door to stop it from closing so fast. two if you was holding her hand why didn't you pull her back if you saw the door closing so fast. it is a man responsible to be the people who help women and kids thru the door not follow them. you are on vacation all having fun but it is still have to have your thinking cap on at all time. you let your guard down and this happen. next time your be the one who leads not be the follower. that is what you should get out of this. it was great that disney had someone check out your daughter.
so.. if a drunk driver, driving a car hits you child while crossing the street.. it's your fault? no, it's theres.. it's called negligence.
Under normal door operation you should always hold the door open or have your hand ready to catch it. You can't just assume it will remain open when you go through.
If you've done everything in your power to ensure your child's safety and they still get hurt, then you are free of blame.
In this situation, you did NOT do everything in your power to prevent an accident. Common sense is the parent goes through the door first, the parent grabs the door from the person letting go of it. If you failed to do those things then it was an accident (we all make mistakes), but you do have some responsibility in the incident.
That is all I'm trying to say. I'm not saying Disney is completely innocent, it was THEIR door, but as the parent you need to own up to your portion of the responsibility as well.
Wow...I'm new here...but even I can see that the persons complaint is that the door was not fixed, or marked as to being broken after the accident happened. This is pretty obvious and does not sound at all like a person looking for money or anything. What happened before the accident is not the issue at all, it is what happened afterwards that matters. Once the accident happened, Disney was aware of the problem, and nothing was done. That is a fault of Disney's. That is nobody else's problem. They at that point become 100% at fault if anything else happens. Again, talking about after the accident, not before.
so.. if a drunk driver, driving a car hits you child while crossing the street.. it's your fault? no, it's theres.. it's called negligence.
and, regardless of how you 'feel'.... it's required by LAW that they have the device working order on the door.. and the incident would never have happened had the device worked... regardless of all the rest, it's their fault, because they broke the law... don't like it? tough....
Not the same...you know it, I know it. Not a very good example at all.
If you can point me to the "law" that indicates Disney, or anyone for that matter, has to have this device working 24 hours a day I would appreciate it. You sound like you may know a little of what you are talking about, and if you do, then you know that Disney probably has a preventive maintenance program that must be followed. You know as well as I do that very few things in this world work every second of every day without there being some type of failure with the device eventually. Take the earlier, albeit weak, example with fire extinguishers. These simply can not be guaranteed to be in working order every second of every day. That is why they are put on preventive maintenance programs or schedules. Where I work, they must be checked once a month…that is it. If it fails within that time line, was the law broken? No. They might (big might) be liable in a civil case. If Disney has followed the preventive maintenance program or schedule, how can they be to blame? Serious question. Mechanical workings fail…there is no way that every single mechanical item can work to the extent you expect them to. It is impossible for any company to have that kind of staffing on hand to ensure there will be no failures with any mechanical devices. The cost would prohibit companies from being in business.
So, no, it's not as simple as "tough". Sorry.
I guess it just shows how slow news and runors must be when we have 6 pages about a door closer. I do hope that a picture of the culprit is posted soon!
If you can point me to the "law" that indicates Disney, or anyone for that matter, has to have this device working 24 hours a day I would appreciate it.
Opinions are good, facts are better...
Just looked through NJUC which was at hand and here is what we have.
Applicable local fire codes: (Should be the same throughout most of teh country as they are set by NFPA and ADA compliance laws)
... Doors and doorways: closers and opening forces
(a) Door closers, if provided, shall have sweep periods adjusted so that it
will take a door a minimum of five seconds to move from a position of 70
degrees opened to a position where the leading edge of the door is three
inches from the jamb.
(b) Maximum pushing or pulling opening forces for doors shall be eight
pounds.
Since a door closer was provided it must take 5 seconds to partially close (nowhere near what the OP described)
8 lbs. of force is very low and is there as part of the ADA compliance issues. The 5 second code is to prevent the door from closing too fast in order to avoind injuries.
The 8lb limit is also there to avoid injuries resulting from doors closing too hard or requiring too much force to open.
As described the door closer was clearly malfunctioning and operating outside of the set safety limits. Based upon this it is not the OP's opinion that it was not working, it is a fact it was not working properly.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.