AVATAR land - the specifics

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
What is the pixie dust equivalent from the Avatar universe? I think that I suffer from it at this point.

A Cameronite?

261f2c7f299ddd20a091f940f1749e518251f5ea3b29b5970b2ca76c12c83965.jpg

You: IRL... :p

I'm such a Hong Kong fanboi, that I missed all this news! It's ok AK... I still love you.
 

DisneyRoy

Well-Known Member
From the article...

View attachment 176087

Iger's quote...

"“It felt so real, so lifelike,” Iger said of the prototype vehicle guests will board to travel through the fictional land. “There’s never been anything like it. The vessels that guests will ride upon will essentially be the banshees themselves, with bodies that move to mimic a breathing beast."

Going from the quote by Iger to the drawing of the ride vehicle leaves me nothing but massively disappointed. I can't help but think the overall land will be amazing with the two rides being great but leaving some guests wanting more.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
From the article...

View attachment 176087

Iger's quote...

"“It felt so real, so lifelike,” Iger said of the prototype vehicle guests will board to travel through the fictional land. “There’s never been anything like it. The vessels that guests will ride upon will essentially be the banshees themselves, with bodies that move to mimic a breathing beast."
Yes, but you can't compare a simple pencil sketch of the ride seat to what the ride itself is going to be like.
 

Magic Feather

Well-Known Member
From the article...

View attachment 176087

Iger's quote...

"“It felt so real, so lifelike,” Iger said of the prototype vehicle guests will board to travel through the fictional land. “There’s never been anything like it. The vessels that guests will ride upon will essentially be the banshees themselves, with bodies that move to mimic a breathing beast."
That seat is not wrong, but it isn't totally right.
 

cheezbat

Well-Known Member
Going from the quote by Iger to the drawing of the ride vehicle leaves me nothing but massively disappointed. I can't help but think the overall land will be amazing with the two rides being great but leaving some guests wanting more.
The land should look amazing, but for a billion dollars I want more than two rides. DAK needs about ten more to make it a full day park for me. Give me a few dark rides...another coaster...a boat ride...maybe a double decker carousel at the entry of the park...just give me more to see and do!
 

Musicman20

Well-Known Member
The land should look amazing, but for a billion dollars I want more than two rides. DAK needs about ten more to make it a full day park for me. Give me a few dark rides...another coaster...a boat ride...maybe a double decker carousel at the entry of the park...just give me more to see and do!

Whilst I would welcome many more, I think that DAK is actually currently a 2 - 3 day park, IF you want to do every show, see all the animals, spend time wondering around, and riding the current attractions a few times (e.g. EE and Dinosaur - I could ride them all day!).

It does depend if you like the 'animal' side of it....I have stood watching the bats, hippo, tigers and gorillas for a long time! I find them fascinating.

I would however like 3 rides at Pandora...maybe they will add another when they can?
 

Cesar R M

Well-Known Member
Whilst I would welcome many more, I think that DAK is actually currently a 2 - 3 day park, IF you want to do every show, see all the animals, spend time wondering around, and riding the current attractions a few times (e.g. EE and Dinosaur - I could ride them all day!).

It does depend if you like the 'animal' side of it....I have stood watching the bats, hippo, tigers and gorillas for a long time! I find them fascinating.

I would however like 3 rides at Pandora...maybe they will add another when they can?
Agree. AK is not all about "rides" or "coasters".
for Coasters id go to another park.
 

rioriz

Well-Known Member
From the article...

View attachment 176087

Iger's quote...

"“It felt so real, so lifelike,” Iger said of the prototype vehicle guests will board to travel through the fictional land. “There’s never been anything like it. The vessels that guests will ride upon will essentially be the banshees themselves, with bodies that move to mimic a breathing beast."

I thought people would be happy you are not just sitting normal Soarin style the whole time and appreciate that aspect. I said months ago the vehicle was similar in design to the speeder bike straddle. The drawing while close does not depict the detail and features of the vehicle that help create the feeling of riding a banshee. The best way I can describe it would be ITTBAB type effects.

Yes it will disappoint some who would love the impracticality of riding their own animatronic banshee but I belive some will be pleasantly surprised to the next best thing
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
It's in the facial expression.

about twice as much movement in her face than any other AA

I'm aware of the technical differences... I just don't think (IMO) it delivers a significant jump vs prior elements. Especially when the projection face figures can provide such incredible accuracy. Obviously the projection faces vs physical depend on the setting to say if one is viable or not.. but I'm not blown away here. I mean the Dave Jones figure in Shanghi pirates.. I was like w0ah.. this I'm like.. hrmph.
 

Incomudro

Well-Known Member
I thought people would be happy you are not just sitting normal Soarin style the whole time and appreciate that aspect. I said months ago the vehicle was similar in design to the speeder bike straddle. The drawing while close does not depict the detail and features of the vehicle that help create the feeling of riding a banshee. The best way I can describe it would be ITTBAB type effects.

Yes it will disappoint some who would love the impracticality of riding their own animatronic banshee but I belive some will be pleasantly surprised to the next best thing

I didn't even think the ride would have this type of seat.
If you've seen my posts, I didn't think Disney would employ anything more radical than a chair or bench due to he varying physiques clamoring onto them.
 

Magic Feather

Well-Known Member
I'm aware of the technical differences... I just don't think (IMO) it delivers a significant jump vs prior elements. Especially when the projection face figures can provide such incredible accuracy. Obviously the projection faces vs physical depend on the setting to say if one is viable or not.. but I'm not blown away here. I mean the Dave Jones figure in Shanghi pirates.. I was like w0ah.. this I'm like.. hrmph.
Wait until you see the full figure, to quote a friend, "The arm alone is the most impressive animatronic figure I have ever seen"
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom