What a bunch of whiners. Most of the "naysayer" comments are the most moronic, hypocritcal baloney I've seen on these boards to date. Explain. Instead of posting idiotic attacks explain yourself. I don't appreciate being attacked without an explanation
*First of all, "The Laugh Floor" sounds AWESOME. We're talking a large-scale improv comedy show inside the Magic Kingdom. Think Comedy Warehouse at Pleasure Island. Think SAC in Orlando. Think Second City. Think "Who's Line is it Anyways". It will be these artists (LIVE performers-- which many of you complain are not featured enough at Disney) that will be the heart of this show---not Pixar, not Imagineering, and certainly not any kind of show writer. Are you saying you don't have faith in Disney's live performers? "the laugh floor" Has nothing to do with TL. I am shocked that WDI thought this was a good idea. I don't have faith that live performers can come up with funny, different jokes every ride cycle.
*Turtle Talk is, hands down one of the most popular WDW attractions in years. If you disagree, then don't complain about the huge line snaking through The Living Seas. Could it be because of small capacity show in an otherwise boring building?
*If you're opposed to "cloning" Disney technology, I don't want to see another post about getting Disneyland's Indiana Jones Adventure. WDW had Dinosaur, and according to many of you, we don't need two similar rides. And don't complain about Body Wars going away. Apparently, they never should have duplicated Star Tours (or actually, since Body Wars arrived in FL first, then Star Tours should be destroyed!) Don't DARE start a thread about Western River Expedition. WDW got its slow-moving boat ride because people complained and moaned so Disney would "clone" Pirates of the Caribbean. IJA and Dino are two different rides. same system maybe, but entirely different rides. TLF is like a mod to TTWC. I agree ST should never have been built.
*Nothing's turning into "Pixarland". Over ELEVEN years (count em, eleven!) Pixar/Disney AS A TEAM has produced SIX original movies and a popular sequel. Pixar IS Disney. So it stands to reason that each park would get ONE or TWO attractions based on a successful movie over MORE THAN A DECADE. I can't imagine that anyone complained in 1995 that Disney would base attractions on Little Mermaid, Beauty and the Beast, and Lion King. Why is it so wrong that they make attractions on their current hits? And it's only been ONE or TWO per park! Let's see. Buzz Lightyear's Space Ranger Spin. Tough to be a Bug. Nemo the Musical. The Seas with Nemo. And now The Laugh Floor. Five attractions spread over three parks does not a "Pixarland" make.
Corrus knows his stuff. If he says its turning into pixarland he obviously knows something I don't. You of all people should know he is the most reliable poster on the boards......
*Who cares if cartoon characters "invade" Tomorrowland. What's the alternative? I don't hear anyone wanting to bring back "Mission to Mars" (and Disney's attempt to create a modern day Mars attraction at Epcot also gets criticized!). Seriously, with Epcot already struggling to provide a real-life "Future World", what harm is there in creating a Fantasy-like future at Magic Kingdom? "Cartoon characters are not original!" some argue. So should they have built Stitch's Great Escape with a GENERIC alien? Should they have based Space Ranger Spin on a never-heard-of-before Buck Rogers type character? Or should they simply tap their ever-popular character archive? Oh, I don't know, come up with something original and unique? Should we add a cartoon overlay to SM? it and TTA are the only things not based on cartoons that fit the theming, and IMHO they are the best rides in TL. Coincidence? I think not
I hope you come up with an intelligent insult to me and the other posters so I don't have to listen to that generic, childish, and just plain stupid insult again.