OSUgirl77
Well-Known Member
Agreed, your third possibility very well could be true. That's all I'm going to say right now, as I'm not focused enough to put together a coherent thought. I shouldn't try to post on here while I'm watching major sporting events.There is a third possibility.
Perhaps they provided him with actual real substantiated information that refuted unsourced, anonymous, Internet message board commentary.
I'm no fan of journalists, or those who currently pose as such, it could have gone down exactly as stated.
However, maybe the "evidence" we have been provided wasn't as conclusive as when presented in such a slanted way here by a source who has been very open about having a massive, passionate hatred against the person this is all about.
Perhaps the reporter asked the same questions folks like I have - was that a final, official itinerary we were provided with? And just who's commentary of what happened (which was apparently translated to boot) was that?
We never got those answers, perhaps the journalist did - which is why he realized it wasn't a story but just strung-together-hearsay with an agenda.
Again, this may all very well be true - including what just supposedly happened - but there are other possibilities that don't require a massive conspiracy to explain that I don't think people are taking as a possibility.
Anyway, Go Cavs!