KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
Also check this out
-
The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More -
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
DAK AVATAR land - the specifics
- Thread starter wdwmagic
- Start date
Also check this out
Mike S
Well-Known Member
Apparently some people have a brain
What's your point?
KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
Everyone doesn't have the same opinion about everything
jt04
Well-Known Member
KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
No Name
Well-Known Member
It won't be as big as Star Wars land. But a mini-land with one great ride could certainly work. Ratatouille at Walt Disney Studios Paris is a nice example of this. It's pretty much a ride and a restaurant in a nice, small little Paris-themed area. There isn't any big entrance to the land becuase it isn't really a land, it's just a ride with a nice space around it. Plus 9.5 acres isn't tiny, it's only 2.5 acres smaller than Avatar Land. Correct me if I'm wrong, but cut out the hangar restaurant and that seems close to the amount of space they'd have for a Marvel area in DCA. Not gigantic but certainly not tiny.
Rteetz
Well-Known Member
Old news already
KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
Just thought it was an interesting look. take it for what it is, i still study these...
Rteetz
Well-Known Member
Theres an avatar Aerial photos thread where everyone studies them.
KingOfEpicocity
Well-Known Member
thanks...
doctornick
Well-Known Member
I know the picture is from Micechat, but wouldn't they have to keep the perimeter road intact? I'm a little skeptical that all that land would/could be available for Marvel.
No Name
Well-Known Member
Yeah I agree, that road would be so much of a pain to get rid of (likely not possible) that it wouldn't be worth it. And backstage areas and CM parking are usually somewhat important, you can't just get rid of it all to build a new land. So I doubt even the rest of that space is usuable. But I've noticed Micechat has a habit of treating all backstage areas like they're wastes of space ready for new attractions, so I don't believe it either. Plus the marked space looks like more than 9.5 acres.
Yes they would.
A foolish mortal
Well-Known Member
At least the floating mountains at Pandora will be better than the floating mountains at World of Chima at Legoland FL 
ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
Lol. That looks awful.At least the floating mountains at Pandora will be better than the floating mountains at World of Chima at Legoland FL
View attachment 131667
View attachment 131668
whats amazing is that there were people on this board that openly mocked Disney and said why bother building Avatars floating mtns they ve already been built down the road
drummond
Active Member
Of course there were. That's par for the course here.
found it
page 190 of the original avatar thread
its actually pretty funny to go back and read old threads to see if people were right or wrong
Not as funny to see that that thread started in September 2011.
Or should that be sad.
i personally find all the gross misconceptions about this project really funny
as far as the timeline not funny at all, a gross indictment IMO