I asked a social media AI bot on the reception of TBA, and they gave me a sponsored response from Disney lol
Welcome to the internet, it's a for-profit venture
I asked a social media AI bot on the reception of TBA, and they gave me a sponsored response from Disney lol
On a raw technical and design level, i'd pretty much agree. Though the programmed motion does have that "flail arms around randomly" thing going on that people have griped about (the Kylo Ren AA has this quirk as well).The AA team, as usual, did exceptional work. WDI still excels here. But, the best figures are so expensive that we can’t actually get rides with dozens of actual AAs any more.
This seems to be the main sticking point for a lot of people: not everyone agrees with this, and we’re happy to see it transform into something we’re more interested in. That’s why I think the fighting is so pointless. Everyone has preferences, and there’s little sense in debating those preferences since no one is going to move. No one is going to be convinced to like something they just don’t. So perhaps we ought to just be discussing the ride rather than debate on the “moral decay” of the company as if this one ride that the general public is going to like just fine even if Disney fans hate it is going to be what breaks the Mouse’s back.
I don’t disagree on that front. I love the new attraction, but I certainly think there are lessons to be learned from it. If nothing else a more coherent approach to marketing and presenting what the attraction is to the public and not speaking in rich details until those details are completely decided upon.To each there own, but I realize that Splash is gone and I totally accept that (but I do hope Tokyo keeps theirs forever even if I never visit that park). My main concern is that the company takes the feedback - good and bad really - and understands that and uses it in the future in terms of developing rides. And, quite frankly, I hope they realize that making changes for knee jerk reasons and being more concerned about optics over quality storytelling is not the best way to run a theme park or entertainment company in general.
What is to say that TBA isn’t going to be just as popular? It isn’t open yet. The majority of people who’re going to get on it aren’t watching a YouTube POV just as they haven’r been following construction.All that matters is what most people think. Disney is a for profit corporation and it’s in its best interest to appeal to the majority of customers.
Splash was easily one of the most popular rides
( backed by data ) in the park.
What Disney should have done is politely tell the small group that had a problem with Splash to pound sand.
I think it'll be popular in that it's something to do and that a water ride in Florida will be popular.What is to say that TBA isn’t going to be just as popular? It isn’t open yet. The majority of people who’re going to get on it aren’t watching a YouTube POV just as they haven’r been following construction.
If it proves to be a flop with guests then I’ll be the first to admit it. But, and I’m genuinely asking, what are you all going to say if it does prove to be successful? What’s gonna be your argument then?
I agree, that’ll be the test. We’re just not seeing it yet, so I guess what I’m really driving at to those who’re already declaring it a failure based on how they feel about it is we just have to wait and see. And if it proves to be a success, then what does the conversation become?I think it'll be popular in that it's something to do and that a water ride in Florida will be popular.
I don't think this will move the needle of selling vacations, DVC, things like that. And I think that's a metric that could determine whether or not this was an immediate success.
I'd be interested to see how popular it will be (if it will be) in the cold season. This will greatly test exactly how popular the ride is, as when the water and cooling off isn't the main selling point you have to actively choose to ride it based on the other merits alone.
That isn't a great metric, since Splash wasn't popular when it was cold, either. I remember plenty of 5 min waits posted on cooler days (keeping in mind it usually went down for its annual refurb for most of them).I think it'll be popular in that it's something to do and that a water ride in Florida will be popular.
I don't think this will move the needle of selling vacations, DVC, things like that. And I think that's a metric that could determine whether or not this was an immediate success.
I'd be interested to see how popular it will be (if it will be) in the cold season. This will greatly test exactly how popular the ride is, as when the water and cooling off isn't the main selling point you have to actively choose to ride it based on the other merits alone.
On a raw technical and design level, i'd pretty much agree. Though the programmed motion does have that "flail arms around randomly" thing going on that people have griped about (the Kylo Ren AA has this quirk as well).
Sure - I think that's why if it exhibits extreme outlier behavior in terms of lines in seasons when it shouldn't have any it would provide good indication that it is overtly popular. If the line behavior acts like Splash entirely though, it's kinda a wash at that point.That isn't a great metric, since Splash wasn't popular when it was cold, either. I remember plenty of 5 min waits posted on cooler days (keeping in mind it usually went down for its annual refurb for most of them).
Unfortunately Disney doesn't really acknowledge failure. Lots of egos at play. Likely the creative team on this ride is doing a victory lap about how they made such great work.To each there own, but I realize that Splash is gone and I totally accept that (but I do hope Tokyo keeps theirs forever even if I never visit that park). My main concern is that the company takes the feedback - good and bad really - and understands that and uses it in the future in terms of developing rides. And, quite frankly, I hope they realize that making changes for knee jerk reasons and being more concerned about optics over quality storytelling is not the best way to run a theme park or entertainment company in general.
I definitely think Tokyo’s should change sometime in the future but honestly would love to see it be a different property. Not because I dislike Tiana, love her, but honestly I think TDL needs more of what the other international castle parks get a lot of which is something unique to specifically them.I guess we know why Disney is still begging OLC to change their ride. If it ever does change, all I can hope is that OLC does it even better. Thing is, that will the same project leaders be in charge of it or will someone else?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.