• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

MK Tiana's Bayou Adventure - latest details and construction progress

Status
Not open for further replies.

BrerFoxesBayouAdventure

Well-Known Member
OLC is in the process of reimagining everything they have to be unique (nothing that exists OR HAS EXISTED in any other park). That's why Space is getting reimagined, that's why Buzz is getting redone, etc. Splash is on the horizon for a reimagining, although I've heard they're simply considering doing the same as with Space and tearing it down and building a bigger/better version of the same story. Same with the castle, there's a very good chance that it will be reimagined sometime down the road
What's the source for this? An insider? Because TWDC isn't happy in the slightest that Splash still exists at Tokyo.
 

montyz81

Well-Known Member
I watched the video before I read any of the comments. I used to get a positive vibe even from the video when watching the Splash Mountain ride. I simply got confused as I went through this ride. The video should say, "I want to ride this attraction." I didn't get that feeling. I will hold out for a ride on it to pass full judgment, but my initial speculation is that Disney has messed up... a lot! Disney, you should start listening to your majority customers!
 

lightningtap347

Well-Known Member
Please drop the sarcasm and try and give a serious response. I’m attempting to have a genuine conversation and legitimately get your thoughts.

I’m not talking about just the line being long. I’m talking about guests riding it and liking it and that being reflected in the guest experience data that was earlier getting used in favor of Splash. I’m talking about it developing its own fans who it means a lot to. I’m talking about ALL the metrics of success that we use to determine if something hits or doesn’t.

If Tiana’s proves to be successful in those ways, then what? What’s going to be the argument then? What are those saying its a colossal failure before it’s even open going to move to if it shows that it isn’t?

What I’m getting at is sometimes you just gotta divorce personal opinion from the reality of the situation rather than insisting that your opinion is going to be the winner and then getting frustrated when it isn’t. Sure you may never like the ride (though I would hope you’re going to do your due diligence and try it in person rather than basing this all on photographs and a crappy POV video), but are you even going to be willing if the time comes to just finally say “its not for me, but I’m glad people are enjoying it.”
I'm not sure. I would hope that people discussing in good faith would internalize that they may just not be the target audience anymore or that tastes have just changed. I'm trying to do this myself regardless, as I haven't really liked much of the recent output by WDI. But at the same time, this attraction isn't resonating with me at all when I feel like it's right up my alley. I LOVE Jazz and Zydeco music. I've listened to PJ Morton long before he was attached to this attraction, and I'm a sucker for AA's. Yet, watching these POV's, I just feel gutted and that it's missing a certain something that I will never truly figure out. Even if this was a new build, I think I'd feel the same way. A lot of the heart and spice the ride speaks to appears to be missing in the feeling of it. Hopefully this changes when I get to ride it next week, otherwise this'll just be another thing to do if the wait is low, which is a shame.
 

JohnD

Well-Known Member
Here’s another video

Some takeaways:
  • Lazy use of firefly screens in-between scenes where AAs could have been.
  • You're not guaranteed to get potential narrative.
  • In this video, it seems Mama Odie gets short shrift. The boat missed the part of the video that Mama Odie shrinks you. Before the final drop, the video hadn't yet reset to where Mama Odie says she's making you large again. And the final time you see Mama Odie before you exit, the boat in front gets Mama Odie talking to you. But as this boat passes, she's stationary.
  • More AAs could have been used beyond the final celebration scene, not just two stationary frogs and view of NO. I think Splash had Brer Fox there. Might have been a good placement for Louis playing the Sax or something.
  • At least, since the same ride system, you still get the same enjoyment of the log flume ride with it's lifts and drops.
 

HauntedPirate

Park nostalgist
Premium Member
What is most concerning to me here is that this wasn’t done on the cheap, so they had enough money to do a lot. How do so many people get together and decide THIS is the storyline? Further, they’ve lost a lot of talent recently, but many of those departed Imagineers still love the parks and would gladly provide advice. It is DEEPLY concerning to me that current Imagineers have the hubris to have Tony f-in’ Baxter in a room, hear his advice, and say, “thanks, but I think we are gonna go in another direction.”

That’s appalling.

And it makes me concerned for other projects. Will they ignore Rohde’s advice on Tropical Americas?

You have these members of your creative team that you elevate to god-like status in your fan communities and then toss them aside? It makes no sense. You can’t start every freakin’ DPB article with “Because Walt Disney once said, ‘…’” if you have no intention of upholding the old standard.
Quoting this because it is DAMN spot on.

It may not be what it once was, but WDI still has talent, I do believe that. I've been told by others I trust that WDI still has talent. But there is something seriously wrong right now. I don't know if it's WDI management, Burbank, a mix of those two, or whoever is putting people in charge of projects and greenlighting plans.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Quoting this because it is DAMN spot on.

It may not be what it once was, but WDI still has talent, I do believe that. I've been told by others I trust that WDI still has talent. But there is something seriously wrong right now. I don't know if it's WDI management, Burbank, a mix of those two, or whoever is putting people in charge of projects and greenlighting plans.
I say it’s “D”
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
With who this is my question. I am a WDW guest mainly. I only visited DLR for the first time this year. For the several years leading up to my trip, I’ve seen nothing but positive things in Disney spaces and other non-Disney specific faces about it. The consensus I’ve seen is that it’s an improvement on the ride system of ToT and makes it more exciting with a more intense and fun drop sequence, even if the IP isn’t everyone’s favorite. The only contentious point I’ve seen after it opened and people experienced it was its outside appearance.
Umm…have a good day…I don’t want to get into an abstract debate with you.
 

Ayla

Well-Known Member
Something that was mentioned in the spoiler thread has me thinking...it was said there is a lot of lead-up in plot to the actual ride in the queue, and as someone that criticized the ride for not making a lot of sense based on the info we already had, this makes a lot of sense to me. Not going through the queue loses a lot of background information for what you're going to see.
 

Trauma

Well-Known Member
Splash is one of the greatest rides built by WDI.

Not breaking news
Yes but Tiana’s is as good or better!

Don’t believe your own eyes, you need to see it thru the lens of the general public.

If the general public rides this ride and thinks it’s as good as Splash humankind is in deep trouble, making the posters of this forum the last hope for humanity.

How exciting we are like super heroes or something !!
 

Trauma

Well-Known Member
Something that was mentioned in the spoiler thread has me thinking...it was said there is a lot of lead-up in plot to the actual ride in the queue, and as someone that criticized the ride for not making a lot of sense based on the info we already had, this makes a lot of sense to me. Not going through the queue loses a lot of background information for what you're going to see.
How much of this essential queue does the G+ line skip?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Yes but Tiana’s is as good or better!

Don’t believe your own eyes, you need to see it thru the lens of the general public.

If the general public rides this ride and thinks it’s as good as Splash humankind is in deep trouble, making the posters of this forum the last hope for humanity.

How exciting we are like super heroes or something !!
That was my mistake…I don’t realize the audience I was addressing in that discussion. No recollection prior to Iger makes any objective Disney parks debate impossible
 

HairyLegPirate

Well-Known Member
I have actively withheld judgment on this ride until it came out because any criticism beforehand, besides unproductive, would frequently be lumped in with bad-faith actors who wanted the ride to fail for personal/political beliefs.

Now that it's actually out and I have watched the Disney company approved ride through video I can say - seriously, what a snooze fest.

Some positives: The animatronics, what few there are, look spectacular. The finale actually seems populated and to have some life in it.

And now the bad: The whole thing feels like it was designed by committee - a committee that never saw Princess and the Frog other than looking at the poster. There's nothing about this ride that feels remotely like the style or feel of the movie to me. And beyond that, just more screens. Like I said, the animatronics, what few there are, look nice. But the laziness of screens continues to pervade the theme park industry. And the story? Is there a story? I mean I know ostensibly it's we need to find a band...for 10 minutes. I believe Jenny Nicholson said on the For Your Amusement podcast when talking about the ET ride at Universal: whatever happened to peril in rides? Removing the threat of Brer Fox or any antagonist gives this whole ride absolutely zero narrative tension! Not that I need Shakespeare out of a theme park ride to keep me engaged but I think I can sum it up like this:

Narrative tension is the difference between a ride full of singing and dancing animals feeling like an entertaining story for the whole family and a ride full of singing and dancing animals feeling like a kiddie ride. Splash Mountain was for everyone because there was a story to keep everyone in the log engaged. This feels like a kiddie ride...that little ones won't be able to ride because of the drop, so truly, who was this for?

This whole ride feels like another example of a subpar product made by a company that's too busy analyzing spreadsheets to actually understand what their brand is about. I forget where I heard this take, but it's relevant: Disney World continues to become the very thing people who were averse to Disney World always thought it was.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom