WorldExplorer
Well-Known Member
No, Splashdown Photo. The register separate from the photo area and the whole section of the store near it was blocked by a brown curtain.The Briar Patch?
No, Splashdown Photo. The register separate from the photo area and the whole section of the store near it was blocked by a brown curtain.The Briar Patch?
That would make the retheme worse if they take away most of the AAs.Most likely they will only reskin a handful because most will be ripped out. So if you only have a quarter of the AAs, maintenance is reduced. I would be shocked if they kept even half of the AAs.
Not to be a smart aleck, but did you really think better is what they're going for?That would make the retheme worse if they take away most of the AAs.
Not to be a smart aleck, but did you really think better is what they're going for?
They’re certainly going for something at least as good. Whether they succeed is another matter, but there’s no doubt they’re at least aiming for a ride that people will find impressive and enjoyable.Not to be a smart aleck, but did you really think better is what they're going for?
No, they’re shooting for cost effectiveness…FWIW, I’m expecting 1/2 to 2/3 less AA’s and several screens to make up the differenceI'm sure they're not actively trying to make it worse, even if that seems like the probable result to us.
No, they’re shooting for cost effectiveness…FWIW, I’m expecting 1/2 to 2/3 less AA’s and several screens to make up the difference
Exactly. The Imagineers have good intentions, but quite simply, 2022 Imagineers are not as talented as 1992 Imagineers and Splash had the benefit of being custom-built with a layout that matched the story. Placing a new story onto an existing ride system (especially a thrill ride) is extremely challenging. And I don’t think they are up to the job.Oh I absolutely expect it to be a worse ride than what exists now, and probably significantly worse -- it would be hard not to be, honestly, considering Splash Mountain is one of the best rides at Disney.
I just think it's silly to insinuate Disney actually doesn't intend to make it better (or at least equal). They're not going out thinking, "let's see how we can make this attraction worse!"
I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
Fast & Furious would like a wordI guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
Of course not. But it boggles my mind that they chose this story. Chapek wants IP but certainly would have accepted a book report ride with “Friends on the Other Side” replacing the Laughin’ Place, which was a no brainer.I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
How do you know? I doubt you even work for Disney.By the way, looks like this closes in January and they think about 18 months will do it…
How do you know? I doubt you even work for Disney.
How do you know? I doubt you even work for Disney.
What if the permit isn’t for the retheme, since there were permits for Blizzard Beach's renovations?Based on the permit, that seems correct.
Oh that's the issue they really are at the mercy of the budget given to them.Yes, but will get the budget needed to make it the best attraction they can?
And yet, bad rides exist.I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
The individuals responsible for this attraction are not engineers or artists.I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
They're spending a lot more than "leave it the hell alone," which would be the best attraction they can.Yes, but will get the budget needed to make it the best attraction they can?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.