Daveeeeed
Well-Known Member
Right, Disney can do whatever they want. They can also not invest anything and people still will go. That’s not the best for us though, as a consumer of a product, and neither would a change of a park’s mission statement like EPCOT is to an inferior one (though it’s really already happened since the late 90’s).That was a lot of words. But essentially I agree conceptually. My point was simply that there is an argument to be made, but as I said in the post you quoted:
That said, and this is something that applies to Epcot purists as well. Themes evolve and change. Just because it isn't on the opening day plaque doesn't mean something can't be done and update/alter the theme.
That doesn't mean we have to like when theme's are updated/altered, but Disney has the right and ability to update their themes for all of their parks. Nothing is permanent.
But again, I don't think Zootopia will be making an appearance in DAK any time soon.
They can do it or anything, but what I’m talking about are the people that are dying for Zootopia to go to AK and not realizing how if they care about themes, consistency, and immersion, they should not want Zootopia anywhere near AK.
I hope your right.
Tokyo DisneySea is by far the best park in the world because every inch of that park is on par with WDW’s absolute best theming and execution.While I do agree, Rodan made the point I've been trying to get out. The theme of the parks can evolve, just like it is with DHS, and is looking to happen to Epcot. Perhaps one day, DAK could go under this evolution of theme as well, and that new theme could be enough to bring in a Zootopia area.
(Also, if not DAK, I could see them using that large parking lot behind Star Tours for a Zootopia area, since it is quite a large space)
The entire park feels masterplanned in a way that only EPCOT Center was. The difference is that it has stayed consistent and built out its theme further, so everything melds and works together. Theme changes have happened to EPCOT & HWS due to neglect. The original themes (especially EPCOT) were superior if they just continued to expand and flesh them out, and not just throw things together and underinvest like they did. If they have a spectacular idea and they are willing to shell out billions to make it a reality I would be absolutely onboard.
BUT, from a historical standpoint, most likely to get AK to be so different than it is today to fit Zootopia it would need to go through hell, or Animal Kingdom would need another 20+ years for a theme change THAT BIG to properly fit and not to feel haphazard like EPCOT. In most cases, it still would feel like a downgrade unless Disney somehow can rewrite history. Themes have only changed if they are fixing the park from neglect, or playing catch-up from lack of original investment. Currently, AK does not have either issue anymore, so it would be a first.
California Adventure and Animal Kingdom both were under-invested in, but replaced cheapness and expanded properly on their original theme and are now both incredible parks (DCA is sort of backtracking sadly). Walt Disney Studios and Hong Kong Disneyland are just adding IP-lands because the parks were basically non-existent to begin with, there’s not really a theme at all. EPCOT Center was basically just abandoned, and had a few cheap and terrible uses of IPs scattered about, and is now getting an inferior theme to the original ‘World’s Fair’ concept; the new investment will be nice, but it won’t ever be as good as it once was. HWS didn’t exactly need to change its theme, but when the working movie studio pulled out it of the park was sort of forced to. I would say HWS was the only park that it’s nice to have a change, button really won’t have a theme at all; at least it did originally.
Basically, based on Disney’s track record and what’s happening with DCA, we should not hope for a theme change at AK, and if it happens properly it is still unlikely that based on aesthetics alone it could ever fit at AK.
But anyway I’m done ranting haha
Last edited: