Montu said:
Good news!
The Indiana Jones Adventure has come to Disney! In fact it's been at Disneyland since 1995, and Tokyo DisneySea since 2001. So it's come to Disney twice now!
I'm so glad to be the one to share this happy news with you!
What the heck are you talking about? :lol:
Anyway, it seems likely that the main problem with the prospect of Indy being built at WDW is NOT that Indy would not be as popular because of Dinosaur, but, since Indy is surperior, that there would be more reason for people to skip AK or at least spend even less time in AK. Dinosaur is still a huge draw for AK, and thus Indy could make AK less worth-visiting.
On the other hand, the two rides are SO different that besides the ride system itself they're different experiances altogether, so they could coexist as well as Splash Mountain and Pirates do, or Haunted Mansion and Spaceship Earth (and Horizons). On the other hand, part of the experiance is the novel idea of the "bumpy vehicle," so two "bumpy vehicle" rides may still be very similar in the eyes of most guests.
At least that my best analysis of the situation.
Gee, thinking of it, I sure wish Dinosaur hadn't been built at AK, because we may never see Indy at WDW as a result.
BY THE WAY, who here agrees with me that Indy would go better at MK, especially since MK could really use a new high-tech e-ticket. And I'd rather see a version of Stormrider (from Tokyo Disneysea) replace Star Tours at MGM.
For those of you who don't know much about Stromrider, here's MousePlanet's review:
http://www.mouseplanet.com/tokyo/tdstour/tdsridesstorm02.htm