I disagree. In Stitch the lights stay off and all it is is him running around and being crazy. In AE things were actually happening (the guy coming in with the flashlight and being eaten), in Stitch all that really happens is he eats a chili dog and burps.
No one in my family likes the Stitch character and what he represents, so we have never actually tried the attraction. I am going on others opinions on the quality of the actual attraction. As someone else eluded to, Stitch's humor and appeal is based on bodily functions, lying, getting Lilo into trouble, and causing lots of trouble himself. I see the creation of this character as an example of the deterioration of our culture. When I thought of Disney as a child, I thought of Princesses and fairytales, not chili-dog burping aliens. I have not taught my children to behave this way, and I do not want them to learn it from Disney.
Yeah. Rewatch the movie and see his change. The "Lost" scene says it the best, Lilo asks if he misses a family, he's overcome with guilt and runs away to escape the results of what he's done to the family.Stitch's true appeal comes from the fact that even though he was a trouble maker, he has a good heart, and does seek out family and love.
But complaining about Stitch then turning around and supporting AI doesn't really make sense. Do you want to teach your kids to eat people? :lookaroun
The problem isn`t with the character or the film; more with the attraction. Stitch (the character) is a scapegoat for Stitch's Great Escape. Alien Encounter had many fans, who`d be the first to turn on Stitch (again, scapegoat). The real problem is the resentment caused by having a good attraction removed for no good reason, and the current one (SGE) replacing it.WHERE is the problem?
I think thats taking it a little far. Like I said, I enjoy the character, but come on, that's a stretch.
Yeah, I have a really weird sense of humor. :hammer:
The problem isn`t with the character or the film; more with the attraction. Stitch (the character) is a scapegoat for Stitch's Great Escape. Alien Encounter had many fans, who`d be the first to turn on Stitch (again, scapegoat). The real problem is the resentment caused by having a good attraction removed for no good reason, and the current one (SGE) replacing it.
Resentment towards the minority of guests (here we go again) who were too ignorant or stupid to head the AE warnings, then complain when their kids got scared.
Resentment towards a concept (SGE in AE's infrastructure) that was flawed from the start. By it`s very nature, SGE will always have problems since it uses darkness, binaural audio and physical effects as part of the show it inherited from AE. SGEs height limit (a loose term, more a method for governing age limits) has been raised several times since opening, thus alienating it (no pun intended) from it`s target audience - a move that adds to the resentment and thought that AE was removed was unnessecary. Furthermore, the fact SGE has been added to and re-tweaked since it opened can be seen by some as proof it was a cheap, rush job (despite the new A-100s) - although AE did fully close after it opened, but to make it MORE scary.
With all this resentment you add into the mix the monorail spiels and decor (messing with the monrails in this way is sacrilige to some) and the castle decorations at SGEs opening and there is no escaping the fact marketing are trying to drive home an attraction that was ill-received to begin with.
Stitch isn`t the target. I, like many others enjoyed the film. The attraction is.
I'm one of the few who didn't like the movie or the character, but again Martin is able to hit the nail on the head completely.
Parenting is what makes a kid good or bad, not an animated Disney character.
Stitch's true appeal comes from the fact that even though he was a trouble maker, he has a good heart, and does seek out family and love.
and where lilo in all this?
she was a good character it the films too, perhaps a great surfing type ride?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.