HanSoloDolo
Active Member
Interesting so many people like Tron Track. I personally don’t ride it anymore. Surprisingly I miss the corny pre-show. Made me chuckle.
Interestingly so many people like Slinky Dog.Interesting so many people like Tron Track. I personally don’t ride it anymore. Surprisingly I miss the corny pre-show. Made me chuckle.
OMG Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan was TOTALLY better than Star Trek: The Motion Picture - you are so right!!!ST1 to ST2
I think the pre-show especially in 2.0 is more befitting of EPCOT Center. I think they did a poor job of integrating the vehicle building into the attraction itself. I think they needed to utilize the screens along the track to "race" or test alongside your guest created vehicles.Test Track 2.0 is better than 1.0, but that's just my opinion and a lot of people disagree
I think the pre-show especially in 2.0 is more befitting of EPCOT Center. I think they did a poor job of integrating the vehicle building into the attraction itself. I think they needed to utilize the screens along the track to "race" or test alongside your guest created vehicles.
I don't think 1.0 was out of place in Epcot, but it was very much in the present and didn't really have the inspirational/aspirational vibe of some of the preceding attractions on that side of the park. Also, while I preferred Test Track 1.0 over Mission SPACE 1.0, I think Mission SPACE was a better fit thematically. Test Track 1.0 was a fun ride but 2.0 makes more sense for the park.I won't disagree there...there is defintely more they could have done to the ride itself, but it still feels properly futuristic compared to 1.0
Early Epcot was all about showing/teaching how it works ala world's fair exhibits. Far and beyond what fairs could provide and TT 1.0 played into that with it's story of a GM design and testing facility.I don't think 1.0 was out of place in Epcot, but it was very much in the present and didn't really have the inspirational/aspirational vibe of some of the preceding attractions on that side of the park. Also, while I preferred Test Track 1.0 over Mission SPACE 1.0, I think Mission SPACE was a better fit thematically. Test Track 1.0 was a fun ride but 2.0 makes more sense for the park.
Test Track 2.0 is better than 1.0, but that's just my opinion and a lot of people disagree
Aaahhhh! I got a like from @marni1971OMG Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan was TOTALLY better than Star Trek: The Motion Picture - you are so right!!!
Wait, what do you mean it wasn't a Trek reference?
Never mind...
Ack! Another one from @marni1971
I don’t think it’s going to be opening anytime soon, you can’t socially distant stage the show really. But still the performers would be brought back from furlough...just like every other offering.So if Mermaid is going to reopen soon where are the trained and approved performers going to come from?
They need to offer an ability to design your car in the MDE app/website, and then save it to your magic band. I'm sorry, but a couple of minutes just isn't enough time and I don't want to waste my day at the post-show kiosk during my actual stay in the parks.
New sign installed:
New Sign Installed at Voyage of the Little Mermaid in Disney's Hollywood Studios
Walt Disney World news, photos, and reviews! We provide you with daily news from the Walt Disney World theme parks and beyondblogmickey.com
I wish the cars could have a more modern design and less "Blade Runner" too, but I digress.
It's too bad they don't just move it to Magic, along with the trackless Beauty and the Beast attraction in Tokyo. Okay the last ones really wishful thinking.
You are not alone!Off-topic but your avatar cracks me up EVERY time.
Epcot was to get Rat or BatB. They chose Rat.It's too bad they don't just move it to Magic, along with the trackless Beauty and the Beast attraction in Tokyo. Okay the last ones really wishful thinking.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.