I really used to like Universal but...
It just seems so incohesive now with a new ride here and a new land there (or way over there). I also see bells and whistles being added everywhere that don't really add to the overall enjoyment of the restort. IMO it's starting to feel cluttered over there at Universal Orlando.
"Hey let's stick some put-put golf courses under the bridge." OK.
"Hey let's build the second half of a land but inside of our other park." OK.
"Hey wouldn't it be cool if we had a boardwalk? Let's make one." OK.
"Hey Transformers is a success out in Hollywood. We have Spiderman but who cares let's bring it here too." OK.
So highly detailed lands and massively awesome E-tickets don't add to your overall enjoyment of a park? Okay then.
"Hey, wouldn't it be cool to give people a highly themed entertainment experience for the whole family in CityWalk?"
Which is a great and seemingly popular idea...I don't see why this is anywhere near a negative.
"Hey, wouldn't it be cool to give people the ultimate Harry Potter experience including a trip on the Hogwarts express?"
It'll get us a brand new land, 2 (or 3) new attractions, and will spread out crowds, not to mention how awesome it's going to look.
"Hey, wouldn't it be cool if we had a new area for people to relax and enjoy themselves in CityWalk?"
Again...I really don't get how this is not cohesive or how this doesn't add to people's enjoyment.
"Hey, Transformers is a great attraction. it just beat out Radiator Springs Racers on Theme Park Insider for best new ride, and people obviously enjoy it. It's a world class attraction that would really improve our Florida park. The ride system is similar to Spider-Man, but Disney has multiple rides with the same ride system in the same park, so it'll be fine."
Again, how this hurts cohesion or enjoyment is beyond me.
I'm sorry, did you personally design and/or work on any of these projects? You seem to have a bit of animosity towards my opinions. I don't even know who you are so rest assured I wasn't trying to hurt your feelings when sharing my view on the current status of of Univesal Studios Orlando.
Let me remind everyone where talking about friggin' theme-parks. This whole forum is getting to the point where you don't even want to paticipate anymore.
Meanwhile, at WDW...
"Hey, let's build..."
"No."
"But you didn't even hear..."
"No."
"Can we at least fix the..."
"No."
Whether it's the final logo or not, this is an official document.
I do have to agree to a certain extent. Personally I thought the mini golf location was crazy. Slim parcels of land sandwiched between buildings and a 4 lane highway? And under a bridge? I much preferred the lovely landscaped Floridian vista from the walkways before. The welcome to a well kept, lushly tropical resort. I'm glad it's successful, but the location beats me.No animosity at all. You just didn't explain your points at all. You made a vague assertion that the additions weren't cohesive to the rest of the resort and that they were decreasing the ability to enjoy the resort. No reasons as to why you thought that.
It's no worse than "Cars Land"
I agree, Disney hasn't really acknowledged it yet. Star Tours, and Fantasyland are solid additions (as an attraction Star Tours is exceptional). They're adding to the area of Fantasyland with a beautification project of sorts, but unlike Carsland there is no anchor attraction included. The additions are all welcome but there isn't an attraction that is meant to "Wow" the guests.You have to first acknowledge there is a war and then prepare and do battle. Disney is doing neither. So, perhaps you are looking at Sea World as UNI's foe.
In CA., it is a different story. But we are talking Orlando here, aren't we?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.