It just seems so incohesive now with a new ride here and a new land there (or way over there). I also see bells and whistles being added everywhere that don't really add to the overall enjoyment of the restort. IMO it's starting to feel cluttered over there at Universal Orlando.
So highly detailed lands and massively awesome E-tickets don't add to your overall enjoyment of a park? Okay then.
"Hey let's stick some put-put golf courses under the bridge." OK.
"Hey, wouldn't it be cool to give people a highly themed entertainment experience for the whole family in CityWalk?"
Which is a great and seemingly popular idea...I don't see why this is anywhere near a negative.
"Hey let's build the second half of a land but inside of our other park." OK.
"Hey, wouldn't it be cool to give people the ultimate Harry Potter experience including a trip on the Hogwarts express?"
It'll get us a brand new land, 2 (or 3) new attractions, and will spread out crowds, not to mention how awesome it's going to look.
"Hey wouldn't it be cool if we had a boardwalk? Let's make one." OK.
"Hey, wouldn't it be cool if we had a new area for people to relax and enjoy themselves in CityWalk?"
Again...I really don't get how this is not cohesive or how this doesn't add to people's enjoyment.
"Hey Transformers is a success out in Hollywood. We have Spiderman but who cares let's bring it here too." OK.
"Hey, Transformers is a great attraction. it just beat out Radiator Springs Racers on Theme Park Insider for best new ride, and people obviously enjoy it. It's a world class attraction that would really improve our Florida park. The ride system is similar to Spider-Man, but Disney has multiple rides with the same ride system in the same park, so it'll be fine."
Again, how this hurts cohesion or enjoyment is beyond me.