willtravel
Well-Known Member
I think the outside is.Why? Is that decor integral to the structure?
I think the outside is.Why? Is that decor integral to the structure?
There's value for Disney in a guest being in line. Sure there's more value to that guest being in a shop, but it allows them to increase capacity. One of the reasons that Star Tours: Adventures Continue did better in Disneyland is that guests had to prioritize it there. They had to plan their day around the new experience. The same wasn't true in Hollywood Studios where it had 50% more capacity.If this was a major concern ( lack of a line) - they'd just run at reduced capacity to boost the wait and time in the queue. i've Never meant a guest that was disappointed that their wAit was too short. So not sure who is not getting what they want in your description.
My wording gave you the wrong idea. By "special" I didn't mean as in something unique that you can't ride anywhere else. I meant the actual experience isn't that great. The intense version nauseates me a bit, while the less intense version is just boring to me. It just isn't a ride that makes me say "Wow, I can not wait to ride it again!" And thats a shame because the technology is so unique and advanced, yet the ride itself isn't that great.
I honestly wish there were family rides in the Space and Transportation pavillions....
There's value for Disney in a guest being in line. Sure there's more value to that guest being in a shop, but it allows them to increase capacity
One of the reasons that Star Tours: Adventures Continue did better in Disneyland is that guests had to prioritize it there. They had to plan their day around the new experience. The same wasn't true in Hollywood Studios where it had 50% more capacity.
My wording gave you the wrong idea. By "special" I didn't mean as in something unique that you can't ride anywhere else. I meant the actual experience isn't that great. The intense version nauseates me a bit, while the less intense version is just boring to me. It just isn't a ride that makes me say "Wow, I can not wait to ride it again!" And thats a shame because the technology is so unique and advanced, yet the ride itself isn't that great.
Mission: Space ambitious?
How's this for ambitious, the 1982 version of the space pavilion, that unfortunately remainded sponsorless:
The potential is there... Too bad they blew it... A space pavilion should have been so much more...I wish they would add more interesting exhibits to the inside. Lots of potential there.
Wow that would've been awesome. It just bothers me how Disney is set on not building ANYTHING at Epcot without a sponsor. If they thought otherwise and built things without sponsors, we would still have Wonders of Life and HorizonsMission: Space ambitious?
How's this for ambitious, the 1982 version of the space pavilion, that unfortunately remainded sponsorless:
The potential is there... Too bad they blew it... A space pavilion should have been so much more...
Because that particular attraction just went 101....Why is everybody in the theater smiling?
What happened to Imagination makes me weep. I for one liked the 'educational' style and although Ellen is funny once or twice, I miss the old UOE....
The colour scheme for Imagination is set in stone. Blue for Dreamfinder, combined with royal purple for Figment.
'He's royal purple pigment' - Figment's colour scheme was adopted for the entire park.
Now you are talking....Mission: Space ambitious?
How's this for ambitious, the 1982 version of the space pavilion, that unfortunately remainded sponsorless:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.