Fantod
Member
They could build a Primeval World Diorama in the tunnel, like they have in Disneyland, using re-purposed dino's from the Universe of Energy.Maybe they'll build a tunnel and add a showscene.
They could build a Primeval World Diorama in the tunnel, like they have in Disneyland, using re-purposed dino's from the Universe of Energy.Maybe they'll build a tunnel and add a showscene.
I don't think dark rides are crappy. I wish Disney built more of them. But the ones in DL's FL are dated as hell and look cheap.I suspect if you think dark rides are crappy perhaps you beling in the Six Flags forum....
I would like to see Roger Rabbit get some love in WDW
You’ve seen the refreshed versions? Projection mapping is hardly dated.I don't think dark rides are crappy. I wish Disney built more of them. But the ones in DL's FL are dated as hell and look cheap.
Yes. I especially think Alice got the best upgrade. But I'm talking more about Mr Toad, Pinocchio and Snow White. They're lots of 2D. But I think I've argued this point before. But The more I think about it, the more I realize that they fit the park they're in.You’ve seen the refreshed versions? Projection mapping is hardly dated.
My podcast co-host explained it as follows, "it's a cool effect, but it's the opposite of charming". I think they are dangerously close to reaching the saturation point of projection mapping.You’ve seen the refreshed versions? Projection mapping is hardly dated.
I feel like I know what you mean -- in the case of Alice I think the projections right at the beginning of the ride as you fall down the rabbit hole are off and away the most successful example mapping in the ride, and they were also an alluring improvement over what was there before. But the White Rabbit projection immediately afterward, while it didn't replace much, seems like a lateral move at best given the way it sits atonally alongside the blacklight nature of the rest of the ride's spaces.My podcast co-host explained it as follows, "it's a cool effect, but it's the opposite of charming". I think they are dangerously close to reaching the saturation point of projection mapping.
My podcast co-host explained it as follows, "it's a cool effect, but it's the opposite of charming". I think they are dangerously close to reaching the saturation point of projection mapping.
I agree. But it’s not a "dated" effect. It’s very current. And that’s the problem.My podcast co-host explained it as follows, "it's a cool effect, but it's the opposite of charming". I think they are dangerously close to reaching the saturation point of projection mapping.
Well, that is the difference between projection mapping and just a screen. And you’re right that it’s what makes mapping at all engaging, the way it interacts with a physical space.I think just like screens, projection mapping is best used in conjunction with physical sets to enhance the experience. See TDL Jungle Cruise temple scene.
Well, that is the difference between projection mapping and just a screen. And you’re right that it’s what makes mapping at all engaging, the way it interacts with a physical space.
That’s part of why a couple moments in Alice fall flat for me - no pun intended - the White Rabbit moment I mentioned, and the flowers blooming aren’t so much mapping as much as they are simply projection. But the trip down the rabbit hole and Cheshire Cat disappearance are mapped over physical sets and figures, and that’s where their success lies.
It just doesn't feel like the first one is mapped very well at all
I guess we better get back to TRON ...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.