This must be fake. Also, why is Tiana unhappy here?View attachment 810494
What happened to her pantsuit? Why is she in her "Wedding Dress"? Why is their no continuity? lol
The ad is real but people are judging a poorly selected thumbnail of a 15 second video.View attachment 810494
What happened to her pantsuit? Why is she in her "Wedding Dress"? Why is their no continuity? lol
It's a somewhat misleading still of this official clip:Is that ad art actually real and not edited? That expression is a hell of a choice if it's legit. I'd like to know the story behind whoever drew it and also what sort of approval process it went through (assuming there was any). Because it's hard for me to imagine whoever was responsible isn't trolling.
Doubt it’ll be any crazier than what’s in this thread. The footage is out there, they know what they’re getting for the most part. I think it might be even better from a pacing standpoint because DL Splash is faster.Waittill this opens at disneyland DL fans are crazy. There is going to be a backlash WDI has never seen before
I have heard (could be fake news) that the dark, un themed area in Tiana in WDW is because the attraction was designed for DLRs attraction.Waittill this opens at disneyland DL fans are crazy. There is going to be a backlash WDI has never seen before
It's a somewhat misleading still of this official clip:
ETA: I see that @Figment1984 already provided the context.
I think it’s poor form to disregard it completely. I rode for the first time this week and after three rides, can say that I had families singing in each log, and only two instances of broken animatronics (non moving Tiana facial features but rest of body worked, and alligator who’s name I forgot froze up in one scene). No bad timing issues to report. Can’t say if I was just lucky, but left no bad tastes in my mouth and the people around me thoroughly enjoyed it.
I know there was a pause in reporting on virtual queue and downtime, but curious if reliability’s gotten better. It seems like things are, but don’t have the data
Someone on YouTube was trying to say that the reason why the animatronics are breaking down so much is because of the weather and because they are "so advanced."I have heard (could be fake news) that the dark, un themed area in Tiana in WDW is because the attraction was designed for DLRs attraction.
Also, the climate is better, so the animatronics will probably be more reliable there, also, its looking like WDW is turning out to be a beta site and they can understand the mistakes they made in WDW and fix them for DLR.
DLR wins again.
I wonder how much of these AAs were made by Disney? It used to be Garner Holt but I don't know their relationship today, like Malificient float being made in Wyoming it may be they bought poorly and are trying to collect on the warrantySomeone on YouTube was trying to say that the reason why the animatronics are breaking down so much is because of the weather and because they are "so advanced."
Tokyo Disneyland has more intense weather (including humidity), earthquakes, SNOW, and they have even more advanced animatronics. Which they maintain just fine. All of their Splash figures, which I am sure are the old hydraulic ones, are running in top form 90 million times a day. The difference is that Tokyo actually cares about the quality of its products, and the American shills will just keep making excuses instead of wanting their experiences to match their ticket prices.
Also, I think that that DLR version of Spalsh always just seemed better maintained. It would go down in the summer because of electricity issues, but it seemed less dilapidated, even at the end.
I wish theyvhad done what they did with Splash for TBA and have different versions instead of a copy + paste in both parks.
Ah yes, the classic "I gambled on a fart and lost" face.If we're talking about derpy Tiana faces...
View attachment 810645
I'll repost something that a mechanical engineer and experienced AA repairman (who has done substantial maintenance work at both Disney and Universal) said on the matter.Someone on YouTube was trying to say that the reason why the animatronics are breaking down so much is because of the weather and because they are "so advanced."
Tokyo Disneyland has more intense weather (including humidity), earthquakes, SNOW, and they have even more advanced animatronics. Which they maintain just fine. All of their Splash figures, which I am sure are the old hydraulic ones, are running in top form 90 million times a day. The difference is that Tokyo actually cares about the quality of its products, and the American shills will just keep making excuses instead of wanting their experiences to match their ticket prices.
Also, I think that that DLR version of Spalsh always just seemed better maintained. It would go down in the summer because of electricity issues, but it seemed less dilapidated, even at the end.
I wish theyvhad done what they did with Splash for TBA and have different versions instead of a copy + paste in both parks.
Only one reason - improperly done exorcism, once you have gremlins and ghosts you might as well close the doors and walkI'll repost something that a mechanical engineer and experienced AA repairman (who has done substantial maintenance work at both Disney and Universal) said on the matter.
View attachment 810646
He singles out all-electric figures in this case as opposed to traditional hydraulic and pneumatic designs because the electronics don't play as well with extremely damp environments.
Splash/TBA is also more of an extreme case of this than other boat rides. There's a large number of drops kicking up a ton of water into the air throughout the entire ride. POTC by comparison only has drops in the starting cavern areas, and AA's are kept pretty far away from these drops in areas where the flume is less turbulent and less moisture is being kicked up into the air and onto sets. Splash/TBA's drops are not only much closer to many AA' heavy scenes, but the figures are also closer to the the edge of the flume. Most of POTC's figures by comparison are which are pushed further back into the scene.
That said, as I also said, it is pretty apparent that there's an extra layer of incompetent design that went into this ride too. Even the most basic moving figures are breaking down, not just the animatronics. There have also been lighting malfunctions too. So there seems to be a lot of different reasons behind the failures.
It's real I've seen it pop up on Facebook ads. She switches out of that outfit because she doesn't want to come off as princess while inviting us.Is that ad art actually real and not edited? That expression is a hell of a choice if it's legit. I'd like to know the story behind whoever drew it and also what sort of approval process it went through (assuming there was any). Because it's hard for me to imagine whoever was responsible isn't trolling.
So who is that supposed to be?If we're talking about derpy Tiana faces...
View attachment 810645
"Guys, I don't think this Naveen. Who the heck is this guy?!"Ah yes, the classic "I gambled on a fart and lost" face.
Impossible - all the experts and insiders said this would be better, have just as many, if not more AA’s, and it had to be good because wdi knew they had to knock it out of the park!!!It honestly just looks and feels unfinished.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.