This seems and looks like a really good idea to me. WDW cannot win, we moan when things do not change for years but moan when they do get changed.
How many times must one explain this?:brick:
Its because when they do change things, the changes tend to SUCK.
It is changing slowly but we do still get leftovers from the Eisner eras like this. I am excited about DCA. On the bright side the changes were green-lit befor WDI's management shake-up so who knows?Not when JL and WDI is calling all the shots. By the way, I have a feeling in this case Stitch was not WDI's idea.
Other than Stitch, I think the rehab looks awesome!:sohappy:
Then we have (partialy) done our job.Almost eery how much attention it got, on a day where the stimulus bill was struggling in DC, a major winter storm was bringing heavy rain and snow to Southern California, and the state government had its first "Furlough Friday" to cut costs. And yet the new version of Small World at Disneyland was the big topic.
.
It is changing slowly but we do still get leftovers from the Eisner eras like this. I am excited about DCA.
Well that's the problem. The kids will ride looking for the characters. The message of unity and world peace will be completley lost on future generations. jt04 I was just thinking the new SSE was done in the Iger/Lasseter era but I am not sure how much was Disney and how much was Siemens.These changes look so minor on a ride that really did need some sprucing up. I have to agree that they don't really change the ride, and at least provide a good scavenger hunt when you go in.
They should provide a list of aded characters so your kids can find them.
Like a giant Where's Waldo book
I would rather have them gut the attraction then what they did.Looks good to me. It's not like they gutted the attraction and replaced every doll with a character.
I don't know what Walt would have done but I know that he respected Mary Blair too much to put his own charactres in her attraction.
Had 10 or 12 of these dolls been put in I wouldn't mind but 29 (plus Carpet and Mushu kite) seem like overkill. The Pixar additions also seem to reek of corpoarte Disney marketing mess as everything, even Small World, now has to have something related to Pixar in it.
My favorite doll is actually the White Rabbit. I prefer working girl Cinderella as ball gown one would just imply "look at me I'm clip art off model Cinderella! Buy my fake jewlery!"
Here's my list for what should have been included:
Alice
White Rabbit
Peter Pan
Aladdin
Jasmine
Mulan
Simba
Timon
Pumbaa (these 3 can pass off as generic African animals while still resembling thir film counterparts without seeming obvious)
Cinderella (I guess you cna thorwn in Jaq and Gus as thier small enough to go unoticed)
Ariel (There are Mermiads to begin with, adding her isn't so bad)
Pinocchio (just not as frightening in design)
The rest are all modern Disney inventions and have nothing do do with cultures/stories of the world (unless you're impling America cuture is nothing but commercialism) and are not welcome in my mind.
Agreed.
However, I still prefer that they not be there at all. Sorry, just not feeling it. :shrug:
I would rather have them gut the attraction then what they did.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.