2) Mag
But, back to FP+...there's nothing wrong with the system. It's neat and it works well. It's far more likely to be taken advantage of by people who know the parks (for example, regulars at MK are FAR more likely to get a Peter Pan FP+ then those who think that the teacups are a terrible wait...)
But, it is what it is. I enjoyed it. I don't see it as a bad thing for those who are staying on site. Criticisms that it hurts guests who stay offsite are valid, and frankly...I don't care. Disney doesn't have capacity issues with the parks, and it shouldn't manage as if it did.
Those who say it's unfair, I'd point out that staying at a "deluxe" (since there are about to be two levels) Universal hotel grants you UNLIMITED FASTPASS...and yes, you can buy it if you stay offsite, but if you do, you may as well pay to stay onsite. Disney is using the same exact tactic (without marketing it to you every 20 feet, like they do with Express Pass at Uni).
Summary
Is it a massive financial failure? As marketed to the general public (that it would drive per guest spending up)...probably, actually, it's hard to say it wasn't a failure.
But, is it a failure as a whole? I would say no. I think, in this case, the executives are quite aware of these issues, and this is the trojan horse they used to sell it to the outside world (namely investors).
But, that's my opinion. And, for the record, I largely am not a fan of MM+...and I've voiced that several times. However...
Like it, or hate it...MM+ is, as has been mentioned, "too big to fail"...but it's a lot more than plastic bracelets and phone apps.
I just felt it was important to point out the the Unlimited FP at Uni, is far more of a individual perk then FP+. FP+, with the exception of timing concerning reserving, is far less of a deal at WDW then the Unlimited is at Uni. At Uni., it is a FP for every FP attraction, how ever often you want to go on it, whatever time of day you get to it. We all know what FP+ offers, onsite or offsite, it's pretty much the same. The purchased "limited" passes at Uni. will allow you to ride each and every FP attraction once per purchase, but still whatever time of the day you get to it.
If or when Uni. has as many rooms available onsite as Disney they will have to change that system. They will literally kill each attraction due to far to many people attempting front of the line with absolutely no control over when they get there. Talk about a nightmare in the making, that sure would be one.
As for the "failure" of MM+. Seriously, all anyone is looking at is park admission bands and fastpass. It should be obvious that MM+ is much more then that to Disney. It is a good tool for them but the interfacing of so many other aspects is what brings in it's value to them. At any rate, even if it is at 2 Billion, I'm thinking that the way it is currently working is telling them that there is a light at the end of the tunnel. Lots and lots of bugs have been found and are being worked out. Some of the problems from the beginning are no longer being reported and new ones are cropping up and being addressed as well. When looked at in a tunnel vision manner, like "not enough fastpasses" or the lines are longer and then stating "it's a failure" is just silly. All that can be worked out and all the IT guys and gals know it. It's just that so many do not like change and this is a big one. It will be rough sailing for Disney for a few years, but in the end, it will prove itself to be exactly what they wanted it to be. So, you are absolutely correct, it isn't going away.
Why is everyone so concerned about the length of the test period? Doesn't it make sense to get everything to function during a time when it is easier to make changes then to declare it official and then overhaul it.
I think he meant more about how WDW has been left to die the past 5 years and is literally falling apart and show issues are still just as bad as they were a few years back. A new land isn't going erase a memory of the fall of park maintenance.
In order to have anything erased from memory people have to have a knowledge that it exists to begin with. Of all the Disney Guests those of us that have even an inkling that there is anything wrong are such a small insignificant number that it won't even matter.
I do see a decline from the beginning, but, honestly, certainly not as huge as it is being made out to be. Cuts are bad... for sure! Less entertainment is bad... for sure, but, if one never knew they existed to begin with (which is the case with most) they see nothing to alter how they feel about it.
@englanddg, I think, posted a You tube presentation of a themed park in the UK. Really, it is an eye opener concerning what the regular non-Disney obsessed population considers to be a fun place. If nothing else it sure brings it into focus.
My point is that comparatively speaking almost no one is even going to have a memory of the fall. To them it never did. Just speaking reality here.