PhotoDave219
Well-Known Member
Yes, but it still isn't a concrete promise. They've bought out contracts in the past.
No, but that reinforces what I'm hearing and that is this rumor is not true.
Now a year from now? Who knows.
Yes, but it still isn't a concrete promise. They've bought out contracts in the past.
How long is the contract for???They recently renewed the performers' contracts, so...
How long is the contract for???
Corporate Disney is aware of the benefits of a Star Wars themed land in DHS. Unless there is a financial earthquake, it will happen.So what does this all mean? Nobody really knows. Other then Star Wars is still a long time ago and in a galaxy far, far away.....
Corporate Disney is aware of the benefits of a Star Wars themed land in DHS. Unless there is a financial earthquake, it will happen.
Eventually.
The primary issue is funding. Senior executive management is reluctant to invest too much in P&R at any one time.
After being at near-record low levels during Iger's first 4 years, Parks & Resorts (P&R) investing activities as a percent of revenue maxed out under Iger at about 23% in 2011 & 2012. (Before 9/11, Eisner averaged more than this number.) At the time, Iger and Rasulo were fielding a lot of questions from Wall Street along the lines of "When are you going to cut back on P&R investments?"
In 2013, P&R capital investment as a percent of revenue was at 15%, placating Wall Street.
For the first six months of the current fiscal year, this was at 15.6%.
Disney publically has committed to 43% ownership in Shanghai Disneyland or about $2.4B. Along with Pandora, a desire for additional cruise ships, and the unexpected MyMagic+ cost overruns, there's been a strong reluctance to initiate additional P&R spending until current expenditures ramp down.
There was a rumor that the Star Wars Land announcement was delayed because of a desire to tie-in the latest trilogy content to the new land. There is truth to this but to the suites in the corner offices, this also is a convenient smokescreen to delay capital outlays until investments are at acceptable levels.
Some within Disney want to spend now to get the project completed sooner. They view it as a golden opportunity to strike while the new films are being released, fix WDW’s worst park, take advantage of an improving economy, and act as the much-desired "Potter Swatter" to knock the wind out of the Universal sails (and sales ). However, this is by no means a consensus. Executive A will say one thing because that's what they want to see happen while Executive B will say the polar opposite because that's what they want to see happen.
One way or the other, the sentiment is to make Star Wars Land happen unless there is an economic crisis.
It's all about getting in so you can surround yourself with those who have the same ideals. Currently we have a bunch of brown noses who follow bean counters.See this is why when I become head of the Walt Disney Company, I'm hiring you as my number two.
No, the doors are something Disney can control.
It's all about getting in so you can surround yourself with those who have the same ideals. Currently we have a bunch of brown noses who follow bean counters.
Can I be the receptionist?See this is why when I become head of the Walt Disney Company, I'm hiring you as my number two.
I want to be the Queen, OK?Can I be the receptionist?
So Shanghai opens end of 2015 and Avatar beginning of 2017. That covers a lot of the capital spend for the rest of 2014 and 2015. 2016 would just have Avatar finishing up. It seems plausible that they could start a StarWars project as early as 2016 but definitely by 2017. If they waited until October 2015 (start of the next fiscal year) to break ground the earliest DHS SW Land would open would be end of 2018 but more likely 2019 unless they open it in phases like FLE with quick and cheap additions like the rumored Cantina and indoor JTA opening first and the bigger ride(s) coming later.Corporate Disney is aware of the benefits of a Star Wars themed land in DHS. Unless there is a financial earthquake, it will happen.
Eventually.
The primary issue is funding. Senior executive management is reluctant to invest too much in Parks & Resorts (P&R) at any one time.
After being at near-record low levels during Iger's first 4 years, P&R investing activities as a percent of revenue maxed out under Iger at about 23% in 2011 & 2012. (Before 9/11, Eisner averaged more than this number.) At the time, Iger and Rasulo were fielding a lot of questions from Wall Street along the lines of "When are you going to cut back on P&R investments?"
In 2013, P&R investment as a percent of revenue was at 15%, placating Wall Street.
For the first six months of the current fiscal year, this was at 15.6%.
Disney publically has committed to 43% ownership in Shanghai Disneyland or about $2.4B. Along with Pandora, a desire for additional cruise ships, and the unexpected MyMagic+ cost overruns, there's been a strong reluctance to initiate additional P&R spending until current expenditures ramp down.
There is a rumor that the Star Wars Land announcement was delayed because of a desire to tie-in the latest trilogy content to the new land. There is truth to this but to the suites in the corner offices, this also is a convenient smokescreen to delay capital outlays until investments are at acceptable levels.
Some within Disney want to spend now to get the project completed sooner. They view it as a golden opportunity to strike while the new films are being released, fix WDW’s worst park, take advantage of an improving economy, and act as the much-desired "Potter Swatter" to knock the wind out of the Universal sails (and sales ). However, this is by no means a consensus. Executive A will say one thing because that's what they want to see happen while Executive B will say the polar opposite because that's what they want to see happen.
One way or the other, the sentiment is to make Star Wars Land happen unless there is an economic crisis.
Yes. If you finish you get a medal.Do they give out awards just for finishing the Boston Marathon?
It differs from runner to runner. For some, the knowledge that they finished is enough. Others like having the medals. I'd say I fall into the latter camp...any time I sign up for a race, at WDW or otherwise, I train for it for weeks/months...and I am firmly a middle-of-the-pack runner, so it's cool to get a medal sometimes because I'm sure never going get one for to winning a race. I would NEVER take one for a race I didn't finish, though.If a runner finishes a race, how much more concrete proof do they need that they indeed finished it?
I go back and forth on this. On one hand...I shouldn't care what happens to other runners and just worry about myself. On the other hand...when the race starts and a person steps over the finish line, declares that they are done and demands their medal, and they get it...I think that's kind of crappy, WDW race or not (no link to back this up but it's a story I've read a few times).Do I think it's necessary that someone who doesn't finish it gets an award? No. But is it that big of a deal for a race in WDW? Not really.
I'll happily take a job at Imagineering if you could get me a recommendationCan I be the receptionist?
Check OCD Andy's GREAT reports on Calico and the Camp Snoopy (I got a tour of that as well about three weeks ago) update on Micechat.
i can see it now..
"photodave, here are the blue prints and specs for your design of star wars land"
"ACKKK spoilers!....Runs Away"
Can I be the receptionist?
They recently renewed the performers' contracts, so...
I call dibs on running the shoe shine standSee this is why when I become head of the Walt Disney Company, I'm hiring you as my number two.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.