flynnibus
Premium Member
Joe is an example of a player that should be an ANCHOR of a strong alliance.. and people could look to turn on him late.
The flaw with the current thinking is they aren't playing to be in a position of power or control.. they just think they can scramble week to week to align the floating pieces. That's like playing musical chairs... you aren't always going to be near the open chair. When that happens, you won't have any structure around you to save you. The free flow scramble will get harder and harder as the # of players gets to a reasonable number.
The best games have always been when people have accomplices they are true to.. within a larger alliance they form to act as a unit.. then adjust when the game demands.
The way the strong players can drop like flies this season is showing just how flawed this game strategy is -- you'll never be safe. And in survivor it's better for longevity to be safe, then the aggressor.
The flaw with the current thinking is they aren't playing to be in a position of power or control.. they just think they can scramble week to week to align the floating pieces. That's like playing musical chairs... you aren't always going to be near the open chair. When that happens, you won't have any structure around you to save you. The free flow scramble will get harder and harder as the # of players gets to a reasonable number.
The best games have always been when people have accomplices they are true to.. within a larger alliance they form to act as a unit.. then adjust when the game demands.
The way the strong players can drop like flies this season is showing just how flawed this game strategy is -- you'll never be safe. And in survivor it's better for longevity to be safe, then the aggressor.