Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
I'm thinking it has to do with Chapek wanting more properties in the park. He was a merchandise guy after all.
Did somebody say merchandising?
I'm thinking it has to do with Chapek wanting more properties in the park. He was a merchandise guy after all.
What's up with all of the new attraction popping up all of a sudden?
I remember Stitch's Great Escape used to scare me when I was little because of how Stitch was still as his old evil self.Add me to those who like The Laugh Floor. It's a lot of fun, and every audience there I've been a part of loved it. Yeah, it's in an inappropriate location. But still a decent attraction IMO.
Really curious about this "people-eater". And so glad if Stitch is going. Too bad, it's a really good-looking attraction, but no fun at all. The one and ONLY time I rode it, it made little kids cry. It's a clever show with a bad script. I love the movie "Lilo and Stitch". What a shame the attraction doesn't live up to the film.
I remember Stitch's Great Escape used to scare me when I was little because of how Stitch was still as his old evil self.
I had always assumed Stitch was a comment on the typical sugar-fed attention-challenged, hyper American child...I wouldn't say he was "evil" so much as "amoral", but that's admittedly a fine distinction and essentially quibbling over semantics.
The Stitch animatronic is great...it is just the shoehorned attraction is not... I would love to see the animatronics reused in another place...instead of just mothballed...Though there are lots of animatronics left over from World Of Motion and Horizons as well that could be used for something.... Use stitch in the static scenes along the Peoplemover track... It would add an unexpected kinetic element to the otherwise stationary displaysSo if it's merch and Stitch isn't pulling his weight, and IF it's WIR, does that really have merchandise flying off the shelves? I know it has a sequel and I loved the movie, but it can't just be based off of merch .... but hey if Stitch gets gone, I actually don't care in this case. I'd take Merida's Great Escape over Stitch, though the animatronic is the one good thing it had going for it. What a waste of Stitch and that theater though.
Bob Iger has publicly stated in interviews that during his tenure the parks are to focus on franchises.As much as I would be thrilled to see Stitch go, would it kill Disney to come up with an exciting, original attraction like they used to be known for? Why is everything a movie tie in? Many of the classic, popular attractions have little to no movie tie in and yet they do just fine.
The Stitch animatronic is great...it is just the shoehorned attraction is not... I would love to see the animatronics reused in another place...instead of just mothballed...Though there are lots of animatronics left over from World Of Motion and Horizons as well that could be used for something.... Use stitch in the static scenes along the Peoplemover track... It would add an unexpected kinetic element to the otherwise stationary displays
He has indeed.Bob Iger has publicly stated in interviews that during his tenure the parks are to focus on franchises.
Bob Iger has publicly stated in interviews that during his tenure the parks are to focus on franchises.
As we spend money at the parks on new attractions that are based on known intellectual property and brands, the likelihood of their success is greater. So when we increase Toy Story’s presence or other Pixar presence, when we put Frozen in the parks, when we grow Star Wars presence, which we will do significantly, when we do it with Princess, for instance, you’re going to see, I think, basically better bets being made that pay off, that are more likely to pay off for us than some of the bets that were made in the past. - Bob Iger, Quarter 3, Fiscal Year 2014 Earnings CallHe has indeed.
Sadly.
That's all children, not just the ones on the two American continents.I had always assumed Stitch was a comment on the typical sugar-fed attention-challenged, hyper American child...
Just compare that to the quote in my signature.As we spend money at the parks on new attractions that are based on known intellectual property and brands, the likelihood of their success is greater. So when we increase Toy Story’s presence or other Pixar presence, when we put Frozen in the parks, when we grow Star Wars presence, which we will do significantly, when we do it with Princess, for instance, you’re going to see, I think, basically better bets being made that pay off, that are more likely to pay off for us than some of the bets that were made in the past. - Bob Iger, Quarter 3, Fiscal Year 2014 Earnings Call
Any chance it could be something like this? I'm pretty naive when it comes to this sort of thing, but I always thought this concept could work in this particular space:
http://www.cavudw.com/theatres/circumotion
"quality will out" Is that the actual quote or are you missing a word?Just compare that to the quote in my signature.
That is the actual quote."quality will out" Is that the actual quote or are you missing a word?
Haven't you read the sign?What's up with all of the new attraction popping up all of a sudden?
A remodel of the theaters and removal of the animatronics could possibly make this a generic space where the IP could be changed out every couple of years after the novelty wore off. WIR becomes Olaf's Alien Adventure or whatever. All one would need is to change out signage and the CGI film.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.