SPOILER: The Acolyte -- Disney+ Star Wars -- begins June 5, 2024

flynnibus

Premium Member
The mother trying to escape with her daughters is killed by the guy who thinks he has a right to possess the daughter he suddenly decided he wants to take home with him. Again, this is just... ewww. And not paternal; it's predatorial, and pure Dark Side, keeping it within Star Wars terms.
Or

Jedi see children they think are being held by a cult they know is problematic so they are on edge... and use their 'right' to recruit force sensitive children as the angle to try to free them. In the moment, they think said cult isn't going to let the kids go freely and a fight breaks out.

Your version of the story completely skips the prejudices that already exist between the Jedi and covent... and the established practice of force sensitive persons being brought together.
 

MarvelCharacterNerd

Well-Known Member
Or

Jedi see children they think are being held by a cult they know is problematic so they are on edge... and use their 'right' to recruit force sensitive children as the angle to try to free them. In the moment, they think said cult isn't going to let the kids go freely and a fight breaks out.

Your version of the story completely skips the prejudices that already exist between the Jedi and covent... and the established practice of force sensitive persons being brought together.
No one has a "right" to someone else's child. And the Jedi are equally a cult - one determined to steal children all across the galaxy. And he was instantly weirdly obsessed with this one specific girl saying she had to be his (padawan). And the mom was LETTING OSHA GO. There's nothing not terrible about any of that.
 

sedati

Well-Known Member
We still really don't have Mae's version of events, especially after she fell. I feel there's still a lot about the coven we don't know- including their fate (dead or passed out.) Also, what's in that dark hole?

I will say episodes three and seven needed the strongest direction and had the weakest. I love what they're trying to do here, but right now, without the final piece (episode) of the puzzle, this is my only real complaint.

I'm shocked some are criticizing the acting of the children which I feel has been excellent... though actually with every single thing being criticized, then I guess I'm not shocked at all.
 

sedati

Well-Known Member
My theory for the last episode is that Sol will redeem his guilt by delivering May back to her home world to complete the ascension with her sister who will also be drawn back there. Like the great conjunction in the Dark Crystal, two will become one thus giving us the singular and titular acolyte. But will this acolyte choose Sol or Qimer as their master?
 
Last edited:

C33Mom

Well-Known Member
Apologies in advance for the very long post touching on many points- as background, I flip flop on how much I like the show (especially the surviving characters) but the story (and especially the mystery elements) are compelling to me and, like a great//terrible book, I find myself thinking about it a lot between episodes.
The long and short of it is that everyone comes from a different perspective. Just because you and some others here find flaws and issues in this show and other Star Wars content doesn't mean that others will agree or even see the same flaws and issues or any at all. That doesn't mean someone isn't being critical, it just means they have a different perspective.
I forget who said it but someone commented on the fact that the writers were obviously trying to make the Jedi seem evil but they were terrible because the Jedi were sympathetic. Why would one assume the writers failed instead of succeeded at teasing out ambiguities in the Jedis and conflicts between their moral (amoral?) code, unfeeling bureaucracy, and their own personal human attachments? Yes, Obi-Wan makes being a detached stoic seem heroic, even cool in ANH, but we learn from Lucas’ own prequels that the Jedi were impervious to a lot of human suffering as they focused on political goals (“peace” and “stability”)—but peace and stability are not good in and of themselves what systems you are preserving. I like that the show explores this theme tangentially. I’ve been saying since Episode 1 (when Jecki comments on Sol’s attachment to Osha) that Sol’s going to end up a Sith because he’s way too attached.
I spent this entire episode asking why it wasn't just a two minute exposition scene with Sol.

Plus having a grown man suddenly get intensely obsessed with basically taking possession of a little girl? That was just... ick... the way that played out.
I thought his attachment to Osha was a sign of his emotional impulsivity (Sith flag), but I don’t think there was anything sketchy about it at all.
I took that as trying to be of a bit of a protective father figure and the desire to have a padawan.
I think the most recent episode did a good job of making it possible to view it either way. You could see Sol as needy/impulsive/selfish but also they’d previously told us that Osha was unhappy on Brendock as part of the witches coven and wanted to leave and be a Jedi. Was Sol having a meltdown or did he have a legitimate premonition that he was supposed to be her Master? Also, I feel like it was an intentional choice to have Mae share the very creepy/disturbing new information about what her mom(s) told her and then Mother Korril was clearly encouraging her to tap into the dark side.
I think critiques about focusing on the multiple POVs about the conflict with the witches and the twins are misguided. It's what the show is about! I get some maybe saw the mae hunting jedi and thought that was how this was going... until the show pivoted in ep3.. but mae hunting jedi isn't what this show really is centered around. Nor is it really Qimir... he's the wheel advancing things... but ultimately this show is about the twins.
I don’t think we know for sure what the show is about yet. There have been some surprising plot developments, and many of the big actors and likable characters died unexpected deaths. A lot of people fell for the misdirection that Mae was actually good and Jedi would turn out to be evil, but the subsequent flashbacks show that Mae was actually willing to hurt Osha, instead of parting with her, as a child. There are still so many unanswered questions— how were the girls created? How does Mae survive and why does Mae assume the Jedi killed Osha? Why did Osha lose the ability to tap the force? How exactly did Indara defeat the coven and did she kill them? Who is Qimir’s master (and/or who trained him)? How will Vernestra and her team spin the massacre they witnessed? Why did the Jedi never mention Mae in the official files about what happened in Brendock? If the twins are so sort of weird vergence miracle, why didn’t Sol try to save both of them and why isn’t Qimir more interested in uniting them both together?

I came out of the episode mostly supporting Sol. I don’t find his actions creepy - they just seem protective to me. In fact I tended to agree with his frustration with Indera just willing to leave the girls there especially when Osha was interested in the Jedi. The thing I dislike about Sol’s actions is why he stabbed and killed the smoke mother. Seemed out of place entirely.
I thought Sol represented compassion and attachment, but his feelings of wanting to save a specific child in a dangerous situation put him at odds with the council who wanted to avoid trouble with the coven (which didn’t make a lot of sense to me). It was Sol’s attachment that led to fear of losing Osha which caused him to strike at the less obviously evil mom. It’s interesting that the (relatively) wise Indara wanted to focus on looking for signs of vergence and seemed indifferent to the fate of the girls, but then by the end of the episode she was willing to lie to the council and everyone to spare Osha’s feelings (or possibly the loss of Sol)? Torbin is also emotional and attached, but he is attached to wanting to be back in comfort in Coruscant. It seems like the audience is suppose to judge some characters for their attachment but the detached characters aren’t very sympathetic either.
That's the thing I thought Sol was in the right with. It's one of the problems I've had with a lot of the storytelling with this show. If a darkside force wielding witch turned into some psycho smoke thing. And the kid was starting to disintegrate, I'd have stabbed her too. Lol. It made little sense because why would she do that if she was letting Osha go? You simply say, I'm giving her the choice if she wants to go with you. Then it's, Osha, would you like to be a Jedi? Great, let's go!
I think it was Mae and she was trying to escape with Mae to safety while leaving Osha to be found by the Jedi, not realizing that Mae had set the place on fire and Osha was trapped…but in the moment he was confused and afraid of the witches and losing Osha. Mother Korrill was clearly willing to kill every single person there before letting Osha leave— the question is why weren’t they aligned? Why did the witches think they needed both kids to survive?
We still don’t know if they were killed by the Jedi (Indara?), if they were knocked out and later killed in a fire or by the friendly neighborhood Sith Lord, or if they somehow lived.
Too many times we've seen this kind of thing. Mae - I'm going to turn myself in to the jedi.
Then tries to kill Sol? What was the point of her telling Qimir she was leaving to turn herself in if she wasn't? The show has so many of these moments. They had a good idea for a story but it's just not executed well in my opinion.
I thought Mae was planning to turn herself in but then found Kelbacca dead and realized she wouldn’t survive if she turned on Qimir.
The split between the sisters is at the core of the story, now infused with some sort of intention on the part of the force (vergence), and a force provided vision of a padawan for Sol. If they get to season 4 having this all clearly laid out will be important.
Episode 7 made it seem like the sisters are far more important to the secrets the show wants to unlock about the SW universe, but I still think there’s a decent chance that one or both of them do not survive to season 2.
The "smoke illusion" as you call it had Sol thinking he was going to be attacked or at the very least her trying to escape with Mae, who Sol confused for Osha, which caused Sol to react and stabbed her mistakenly.
I understand why he acted how he did but I think the show may be foreshadowing his turn to the dark side.
I completely agree. Unless you are committed to ending the story, no matter if it takes 2 or 3 seasons, don't make it. You should have each season have a neat conclusion with some open theeads that you've put out for the series to continue. Then if it's not a success, you aren't leaving a bunch of important stuff unanswered.
I don’t see anyway they can wrap up the multiple major character development plots (twins, Qimir, Sol, Vernestra, Korill) let alone answer the loose threads about the past or the significance of the cortosis planet/mine, in one episode. I think not giving it another season or two to explore its themes and how they are worked into Sith legends would be a shame even though I don’t particularly like the main characters driving the plot. I also think pulling the plug without solving the mysteries would be bad for future SW shows on Disney+ — I personally don’t want to start on new series if there’s a 50/50 chance the major plot questions are never answered.

The biggest take away I've gotten from the show is that the Jedi are more susceptible to their emotions than we've previously been shown. That yes they are flawed and nuanced even if trying to be the idealistic version based on the teachings we've known previously. They aren't gods, they are mortals that fall to the same mortal trappings as others around them, including emotion.
In general, this kind of emotion and attachment is warned (through the original trilogy and the prequels) will lead to the dark side. I’ve been waiting for Sol to turn to the dark side since Jecki pointed out he was unusually attached to Osha in the opening episode.
What George told us about the Jedi:
  • Obi-Wan - Goes into hiding.
  • Yoda - Goes into hiding. Remind me again, what does fear lead to?
  • Luke - emotional mess.
  • Anakin - emotional mess.
  • Other Jedi - Turn a blind eye to slavery. Become pawns of the state. Become Warlords. Recruit very young children into their cult.
I agree these main characters are mostly consistent with the most famous Jedi in core Lucas cannon. The show seems to be warning against emotion, but I don’t feel that it’s presenting the more stoic Jedi (Indara, Vernestra) in the best light either.

So far, Osha is the only character we’ve seen consistently care about people (freeing guy in prisoner transport, trying to help save other Jedi with Yord) while also remaining fairly detached and stoic—willing to turn her sister in and not giving into fear or hate—but she was trending more like Anakin than Luke when we last saw her in Episode 6.
Or

Jedi see children they think are being held by a cult they know is problematic so they are on edge... and use their 'right' to recruit force sensitive children as the angle to try to free them. In the moment, they think said cult isn't going to let the kids go freely and a fight breaks out.

Your version of the story completely skips the prejudices that already exist between the Jedi and covent... and the established practice of force sensitive persons being brought together.
I think it’s hard to know whether Sol or the council were good v evil (by our standards) since we don’t know what plans the coven had for the girls. We do know that Osha was unhappy there before she ever met a Jedi and the things Mae told the Jedis sounded very disturbing out of context.
Unfortunately I think you are ascribing motives that aren't intended for whatever reason.

The Jedi are suppose to be the peace keepers in the universe, which includes also trying to prevent non-sanctioned force wielders from growing in power. This means they recruit any force sensitive child they find to ensure they remain on the light side of the force. They happen upon a cult, while investigating a supposedly uninhabited planet that is teeming with the force, that from the outside looks like dark side users. Who are at best using the dark side of the force to create life, which isn't suppose to be allowed, and at worst could be trying to sacrifice that created life to gain more power.
+1
What’s interesting to me is that Sol and Torbin had totally different reasons for returning to retrieve the children, I think Sol’s reasons may have been more noble while Torbin just wanted to GTFO of Brendock—but they lead to the same disaster. Meanwhile, Indara (and Kelnacca) were prepared to potentially allow terrible things to happen to Osha and Mae so they could keep doing theoretical force research studies in peace. I would be curious to know who was on the council and what types of motivations and loyalties they held when deciding not to remove the children from the coven.
I will say episodes three and seven needed the strongest direction and had the weakest. I love what they're trying to do here, but right now, without the final piece (episode) of the puzzle, this is my only real complaint.

I'm shocked some are criticizing the acting of the children which I feel has been excellent... though actually with every single thing being criticized, then I guess I'm not shocked at all.
I do think it's possible that we only got the Jedi version and Mae’s might be different— but there’s no way they can wrap up even half the loose threads and go back to retell the events on Brendock again in one episode.

I thought the child actors were fine as long as you aren’t supposed to really like Mae (cruel, controlling and unstable) and Osha (mopey, whiny, vaguely remnant of Luke on Tatooine)— both seem annoying for different reasons. I’m reserving any criticism for the flashback episodes until I see if they somehow manage to address all the open questions and loose threads.
 

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
What George told us about the Jedi:
  • Obi-Wan - Goes into hiding.
  • Yoda - Goes into hiding. Remind me again, what does fear lead to?
  • Luke - emotional mess.
  • Anakin - emotional mess.
  • Other Jedi - Turn a blind eye to slavery. Become pawns of the state. Become Warlords. Recruit very young children into their cult.
George Lucas used Yoda’s character to impart lessons about patience, wisdom, and strategic thinking.
Yoda’s retreat wasn’t driven by fear but rather by the necessity to survive and preserve the Jedi Order’s knowledge for future generations. He understood that a direct confrontation with the newly established Empire and its powerful Sith leader would be futile and lead to further loss. Instead, he chose a path that allowed him to bide his time and ensure the possibility of a future rebellion against the Empire.

Disney, in contrast to Lucas, showed a young audience how to quit on yourself. Luke quit on himself and the galaxy. His purpose in exile was to cut himself off from the Force and remove himself from the galaxy’s conflicts. He quit on his friends, family, the Force, and himself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
George Lucas used Yoda’s character to impart lessons about patience, wisdom, and strategic thinking.
Yoda’s retreat wasn’t driven by fear but rather by the necessity to survive and preserve the Jedi Order’s knowledge for future generations. He understood that a direct confrontation with the newly established Empire and its powerful Sith leader would be futile and lead to further loss. Instead, he chose a path that allowed him to bide his time and ensure the possibility of a future rebellion against the Empire.

Disney, in contrast to Lucas, showed a young audience how to quit on yourself. Luke quit on himself and the galaxy. His purpose in exile was to cut himself off from the Force and remove himself from the galaxy’s conflicts. He quit on his friends, family, the Force, and himself.
Um, did you watch the Prequels? Yoda and Mace both had separate direct confrontations and duels against Palps. Yoda literally says, "Into exile I must go, failed I have". I think you got part of it right, but he gave up because he realized that the old ways wouldn't defeat Palps after his duel with him. He needed a new Jedi that would learn from the mistakes of the past to take down Palps, and was hoping either Luke or Leia would be that Jedi.

What's funny though is what if neither had taken up the teachings, both Yoda and Obi-Wan would have passed away without a new Jedi to take over. That is why maybe going into exile wasn't the best idea in the grand scheme of things.
 

MarvelCharacterNerd

Well-Known Member
Would you have the same feelings if it was a boy instead of a girl? Did you have the same feelings with Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan basically doing the same thing with Anakin? Unfortunately I think you are ascribing motives that aren't intended for whatever reason.

The Jedi are suppose to be the peace keepers in the universe, which includes also trying to prevent non-sanctioned force wielders from growing in power. This means they recruit any force sensitive child they find to ensure they remain on the light side of the force. They happen upon a cult, while investigating a supposedly uninhabited planet that is teeming with the force, that from the outside looks like dark side users. Who are at best using the dark side of the force to create life, which isn't suppose to be allowed, and at worst could be trying to sacrifice that created life to gain more power.

So there is both a motivation to protect the twins because of their unique lineage to the force, but also to prevent potentially something bad happening. The rest are unintended consequences that happens because of those motivations.
Yes, I would have had the same reaction if the child was a boy. As I said, I'm not ascribing motives here beyond the portrayal of one man's sudden need to possess a child that came across not as "oh, this child is special and should be encouraged to develop her talents" but "I WANT HER AS MINE AND I'LL DO WHAT I NEED TO TO HAVE HER."

As for the PT, I saw it once, didn't care for it and didn't have the desire to watch it again so I don't really remember much of my reaction to it beyond thinking Ewan did a great Alec Guinness impression and Darth Maul looked cool when fighting.

On the peacekeeping subject - again, taking kids from their parents is not a road to peace. And the Jedi, too, can be seen (and I think it's implied in the OT that they were later perceived) as a weird religious cult.

And who gets to decide who has the right to create life? Two parents wanted kids and they made them using the means at their disposal. It seems a pretty clear "protect surrogacy" metaphor to me with Sol and the Jedi on the opposite side saying only they can determine who can be parents.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Yes, I would have had the same reaction if the child was a boy. As I said, I'm not ascribing motives here beyond the portrayal of one man's sudden need to possess a child that came across not as "oh, this child is special and should be encouraged to develop her talents" but "I WANT HER AS MINE AND I'LL DO WHAT I NEED TO TO HAVE HER."
I appreciate your opinion, except I do think you are ascribing motives here, as it does not come across the way you are portraying. In fact I don't believe that was the intent of the creators of the show. I rather not go into this further as it would take us into topics that are likely not allowed on this site.

As for the PT, I saw it once, didn't care for it and didn't have the desire to watch it again so I don't really remember much of my reaction to it beyond thinking Ewan did a great Alec Guinness impression and Darth Maul looked cool when fighting.
You may want to watch the Prequels again in light of your opinions on this show.

On the peacekeeping subject - again, taking kids from their parents is not a road to peace. And the Jedi, too, can be seen (and I think it's implied in the OT that they were later perceived) as a weird religious cult.
This has been an argument on both sides of the debate for decades now. Are the Jedi within their rights as the peacekeepers of the universe to take force sensitive kids as recruits? Some say yes, some say no. As its a core tenant of the Jedi order and is sanctioned by the galactic government, the answer from a canon standpoint is yes. If you don't agree, well then maybe you fall on the sith side, but that has its own things that can be looked at negatively. So there is no right or wrong answer here.

And who gets to decide who has the right to create life? Two parents wanted kids and they made them using the means at their disposal. It seems a pretty clear "protect surrogacy" metaphor to me with Sol and the Jedi on the opposite side saying only they can determine who can be parents.
Its not as cut and dry and you're making it seem.

At this point we don't know the whole story, we don't know exactly how the twins were created. Its just assumed they are made by manipulating the force, but we don't know how or even if that is the full story. Also since you've only seen the Prequels once and you don't remember a lot of it, you're missing out on a lot of the backstory in canon on why this is seen as a negative by the Jedi.
 

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
Um, did you watch the Prequels? Yoda and Mace both had separate direct confrontations and duels against Palps. Yoda literally says, "Into exile I must go, failed I have". I think you got part of it right, but he gave up because he realized that the old ways wouldn't defeat Palps after his duel with him. He needed a new Jedi that would learn from the mistakes of the past to take down Palps, and was hoping either Luke or Leia would be that Jedi.

What's funny though is what if neither had taken up the teachings, both Yoda and Obi-Wan would have passed away without a new Jedi to take over. That is why maybe going into exile wasn't the best idea in the grand scheme of things.
Speaking facts Irish… what I said holds true and always has. Facts are facts.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Speaking facts Irish… what I said holds true and always has. Facts are facts.
Fact is that Yoda had a direct duel with Palps and was defeated. He didn't just go into exile for the reasons you said, he went in because he was defeated in battle with the Sith Lord. So if you want to just ignore all the subtext of everything else in the Prequels, sure what you said holds true if you squint your eyes.
 

MagicMouseFan

Well-Known Member
Fact is that Yoda had a direct duel with Palps and was defeated. He didn't just go into exile for the reasons you said, he went in because he was defeated in battle with the Sith Lord. So if you want to just ignore all the subtext of everything else in the Prequels, sure what you said holds true if you squint your eyes.
Yoda’s retreat was not a mere act of defeat but a calculated move to ensure the survival and future resurgence of the Jedi Order. Ignoring this context and subtext misses the depth of his character and the intricate narrative of the Star Wars saga.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

MarvelCharacterNerd

Well-Known Member
I appreciate your opinion, except I do think you are ascribing motives here, as it does not come across the way you are portraying. In fact I don't believe that was the intent of the creators of the show. I rather not go into this further as it would take us into topics that are likely not allowed on this site.
As I said, not ascribing motives that I've said I don't think were intended. I just think it's portrayed (unpleasantly) as a creepy power trip and therefore in no way has teacher/paternal motives. It's just "I see, I want, i take". Which, as you noted, seems to be a Jedi thing. Which again does not portray the Jedi in a good light.
You may want to watch the Prequels again in light of your opinions on this show.
I would only watch them again if paid to. lol
This has been an argument on both sides of the debate for decades now. Are the Jedi within their rights as the peacekeepers of the universe to take force sensitive kids as recruits? Some say yes, some say no. As its a core tenant of the Jedi order and is sanctioned by the galactic government, the answer from a canon standpoint is yes. If you don't agree, well then maybe you fall on the sith side, but that has its own things that can be looked at negatively. So there is no right or wrong answer here.
If stealing kids to force them to follow a specific belief system and life path is the Jedi way, how are they any different from the Empire's oppressive belief that their way of controlling people is the correct one?
Its not as cut and dry and you're making it seem.

At this point we don't know the whole story, we don't know exactly how the twins were created. Its just assumed they are made by manipulating the force, but we don't know how or even if that is the full story. Also since you've only seen the Prequels once and you don't remember a lot of it, you're missing out on a lot of the backstory in canon on why this is seen as a negative by the Jedi.
Agreed we don't know the whole story yet. But short of the moms creating their daughters out of dead babies souls or something or creating them with the intent to destroy the universe, I think the basic message of others trying to prevent children being born to parents who want them, and then stealing them from those parents, is again, not showing the Jedi are the good guys.

And in the same argument that the MCU's expanding universe means stories are becoming less accessible to the general public who may not follow everything 100%, I think other than Mando, whose success - aside from the cute kid - was its standalone quality, all of the Star Wars shows that require you to have a detailed knowledge of the universe (even to those of us who've seen most of it at least once) in order to understand what's going on, are a failure of storytelling. I could vaguely follow Ahsoka having not seen the animated shows because I had a vague understanding of story and characters. And if you're saying that my not having a better familiarity with the PT (or Legends tales or whatever0 leads to my not understanding what's going on in this show - that responsibility shouldn't be on me, the viewer, to have to do more homework, but on the storytellers to inform me as to what's going on. Ahsoka - which I still rather enjoyed even though I knew enough to know how much I was missing - was particularly bad at this, being a pure sequel to two other shows.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
As I said, not ascribing motives that I've said I don't think were intended. I just think it's portrayed (unpleasantly) as a creepy power trip and therefore in no way has teacher/paternal motives. It's just "I see, I want, i take". Which, as you noted, seems to be a Jedi thing. Which again does not portray the Jedi in a good light.
Its an interesting take on things, but one that I don't think the creators intended, at least not in the way you're portraying. But that is the thing about storytelling, everyone gets something different from the stories being told.

I would only watch them again if paid to. lol
I can understand that, it just would provide more context to the stories being told.

If stealing kids to force them to follow a specific belief system and life path is the Jedi way, how are they any different from the Empire's oppressive belief that their way of controlling people is the correct one?
You've been using the word "stealing" pretty liberally here. They aren't snatching kids in the middle of the night like some kidnapper.

Agreed we don't know the whole story yet. But short of the moms creating their daughters out of dead babies souls or something or creating them with the intent to destroy the universe, I think the basic message of others trying to prevent children being born to parents who want them, and then stealing them from those parents, is again, not showing the Jedi are the good guys.
The TLDR, manipulating the force to create life is something that is seen as unnatural and something that is seen as using the dark side of the force, similar to cloning. You have to look at this from in-universe beliefs rather than from our universe beliefs. If this was talking about our universe I would agree with you, but we're talking about a fantasy universe that has its own lore.

And in the same argument that the MCU's expanding universe means stories are becoming less accessible to the general public who may not follow everything 100%, I think other than Mando, whose success - aside from the cute kid - was its standalone quality, all of the Star Wars shows that require you to have a detailed knowledge of the universe (even to those of us who've seen most of it at least once) in order to understand what's going on, are a failure of storytelling. I could vaguely follow Ahsoka having not seen the animated shows because I had a vague understanding of story and characters. And if you're saying that my not having a better familiarity with the PT (or Legends tales or whatever0 leads to my not understanding what's going on in this show - that responsibility shouldn't be on me, the viewer, to have to do more homework, but on the storytellers to inform me as to what's going on. Ahsoka - which I still rather enjoyed even though I knew enough to know how much I was missing - was particularly bad at this, being a pure sequel to two other shows.
I don't disagree that the stories need to do a better job at being more standalone in order to be more accessible. However with that said you are talking about a franchise that has over 4 decades of lore associated with it. So you have to expect that they are going to at least sprinkle in that lore into the stories to at least provide context.
 

spacemt354

Chili's
Speaking facts Irish… what I said holds true and always has. Facts are facts.
Fact is that Yoda had a direct duel with Palps and was defeated. He didn't just go into exile for the reasons you said, he went in because he was defeated in battle with the Sith Lord. So if you want to just ignore all the subtext of everything else in the Prequels, sure what you said holds true if you squint your eyes.
They dueled to a draw. At the end of the duel, Palpatine was dangling from a rafter and Yoda fell to the ground after their force lightning blew each of them backward. Yoda took that opportunity to retreat because at that point, continuing the fight was futile. He 'failed' not only being unable to take out Palpatine, but also as the leader of the Jedi Order, allowing the rise of the Empire to happen under his watch.

Going into exile didn't mean that they are cut off from growth though, if anything they become closer with the force. Qui-Jon learned how to become a force ghost and further train Obi-Wan. Dagobah was chosen because it's one of the purest planets in the galaxy that's strong with the force.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
If stealing kids to force them to follow a specific belief system and life path is the Jedi way, how are they any different from the Empire's oppressive belief that their way of controlling people is the correct one?
Because the Jedi training is a way to protect the many WHILE ALSO enriching the individual. Instead of the empire only seeking their own enrichment through control.

The Jedi are intrinsically supposed to be selfless... while the empire is the opposite.

I think the basic message of others trying to prevent children being born to parents who want them, and then stealing them from those parents, is again, not showing the Jedi are the good guys.

Or... it's showing how IDEALS don't always lead to pure white snow versions of things. How they could break a few eggs along the way through mistakes... or how individual jedi are not as capable of holding to the ideals as others. It's showing them to be more human .. not necessarily as 'the bad guys'
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
They dueled to a draw. At the end of the duel, Palpatine was dangling from a rafter and Yoda fell to the ground after their force lightning blew each of them backward. Yoda took that opportunity to retreat because at that point, continuing the fight was futile. He 'failed' not only being unable to take out Palpatine, but also as the leader of the Jedi Order, allowing the rise of the Empire to happen under his watch.
He failed because not only did he lose the fight, he lost the castle. He didn't withdraw to his stronghold... he retreated from it entirely.

no he wasn't going to fight to the death - but he was conceding the battle was lost.
 

spacemt354

Chili's
He failed because not only did he lose the fight, he lost the castle. He didn't withdraw to his stronghold... he retreated from it entirely.

no he wasn't going to fight to the death - but he was conceding the battle was lost.
The castle was already lost before they dueled. Order 66 already occurred. There was no stronghold to retreat to. Staying alive was one of the only hopes.

Neither character won nor lost the fight because they left the other one alive, hence why Palpatine angrily ordered the troops to “double their search” after they couldn’t find Yoda.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
The castle was already lost before they dueled. Order 66 already occurred. There was no stronghold to retreat to. Staying alive was one of the only hopes.

Neither character won nor lost the fight because they left the other one alive, hence why Palpatine angrily ordered the troops to “double their search” after they couldn’t find Yoda.
One can lose a fight, a battle, or even a war, without being killed by their opponent.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom