FettFan
Well-Known Member
Maybe a bit of alliteration could have spiced the name up. Like Tiana's Trading Co or something.
We already have one TTC on property, thank you very much!
Maybe a bit of alliteration could have spiced the name up. Like Tiana's Trading Co or something.
That's interesting and it would make sense for a scenario for that to happen. Are there any sources that elaborate on this rumor though? I hadn't heard it among all of the nonsense, but it would actually make a lot of business sense.
I completely agree.(Btw, ending lucasarts was one of the dumbest decisions Disney ever made…but that’s another topic for another thread)
The “salt mine” storyline is an improvement? They were given additional funding for the attraction and that’s still the best they could come up with? Seriously??If the information given to me is correct, the budget for the current salt mine variant is actually far higher than it was when they first announced the ride. The initial art was the low budget "thrown together" version. The early rumors were in the $30-$40 million range. This was back when the "Lost Trumpet" variant was being tossed around. I'm also not sure they ever planned on using anything from that initial concept art, it was cobbled together on short notice with little thought. The Tiana and Louis figures certainly wouldn't have been placed in that area for instance. But even if they HAD built the tree/boat, that variant called for a very dark, empty and video-centric interior that would have ruined any hopes of it being an acceptable replacement for Splash.
Despite the loss of the details at the top of the mountain (and I also consider them a loss), it's not the end of the world if the budget was actually increased and the money redirected to the interior scenes instead.
I think the “salt mine” idea was part of the attraction setting’s backstory (what the Imagineers use to help make consistent creative choices), not the storyline of the attraction (what guests are told through the attraction experience).The “salt mine” storyline is an improvement? They were given additional funding for the attraction and that’s still the best they could come up with? Seriously??
Yikes.
Or she could hand the deed to Toad.......I will only accept Tiana's Bayou Adventure if it ends with Tiana handing the deed of the company over to an animatronic Bob Iger as he acquires all of Tiana's Foods for $35 quintillion and a half.
It’s the backstory and the settingI think the “salt mine” idea was part of the attraction setting’s backstory (what the Imagineers use to help make consistent creative choices), not the storyline of the attraction (what guests are told through the attraction experience).
Well, it was inevitable that it was gonna close in January. Sad to see Splash Mountain go, but it is what it is now. The concept art looks better then what was shown before. Not sure how Disneyland’s is gonna be done by late 2024 if they don’t close that one soon as well.
Unless there are cameos of Hubig's Pies, it just won't be authentic.The ride is apparently a "prequel" to the D+ series. New characters from the series will also appear in the ride. I'm guessing some of them are the ones from this image (just a safe assumption)-
You're Fired!™When she gets more money, she’ll build Tiana Tower and start selling Tiana Steaks and found the questionable Tiana University.
I’m starting to rethink my opinion of Tiana…
And she'll likely be 14 before she can experience it...OTOH, I told my daughter today about the retheme. Tiana is her favorite princess, so she's excited. And fortunately for her, she's 7, so she won't have detailed memories of Splash to compare it to...
Disney paid $4 Billion for Marvel, $4.05 Billion for Lucasfilm, $7.4 Billion for Pixar,
The Fox deal was $71.3 Billion. That’s why they’re putting so much stock in Avatar 2 being a success.
The Avatar Sequel Is a Make-or-Break Moment for Disney’s $71 Billion Fox Deal
Returning boss Bob Iger oversaw the 2019 purchase. A December premiere will help indicate whether he overpaid.www.bloomberg.com
Iger overpaid for Fox, especially when his primary motivator was to get the Fox Marvel rights (Fantastic 4 and X-Men) back under the control of Marvel Studios.
Certain parts of Fox, the ones that are redundant, will be sold off to stop the bleeding. Disney can’t afford to just shutter them, as they did LucasArts and LucasBooks after that acquisition.
(Btw, ending lucasarts was one of the dumbest decisions Disney ever made…but that’s another topic for another thread)
I doubt the salt mine backstory affected the budget. It's just something Carter's team seems insistent on having to try and justify why there's a tall hill in a swampy area. A stupid idea for sure, but so far I'm not seeing much about that idea that would impact the budget either way. Looking at the model, I would not be able to figure out that a salt mine was even part of the story without being told.The “salt mine” storyline is an improvement? They were given additional funding for the attraction and that’s still the best they could come up with? Seriously??
Yikes.
That's not the case.Iger overpaid for Fox, especially when his primary motivator was to get the Fox Marvel rights (Fantastic 4 and X-Men) back under the control of Marvel Studios.
None of our reliable 'insiders' have been saying that.I’ve been listening to all the talking heads spouting their rumors from “insiders” and just played it like a game of telephone.
There’s got to be a kernel of truth about a pending asset sale, but everyone jumped to the most extreme conclusion.
And often the one source had it wrong or made it up......None of our reliable 'insiders' have been saying that.
The Internet is a giant echo chamber. We just had people post how several sites were indicating that the FL legislature was backing off of nixing RCID... all those sites were reporting the one source saying it. But, people were starting to be convinced of its veracity because so many places were saying it.
But it was just one source. This happens all. the. time.
Multiple mouth pieces doesn't mean multiple sources.
"Lots of bad evidence doesn't add up to good evidence."None of our reliable 'insiders' have been saying that.
The Internet is a giant echo chamber. We just had people post how several sites were indicating that the FL legislature was backing off of nixing RCID... all those sites were reporting the one source saying it. But, people were starting to be convinced of its veracity because so many places were saying it.
But it was just one source. This happens all. the. time.
Multiple mouth pieces doesn't mean multiple sources.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.