Kirby86
Well-Known Member
Yeah they have to hit the ground running. Maybe Disneyland will be able to survive capacity wise if the retheme runs into delays with construction however Magic Kingdom dosen't have this luxury. They less rides and attractions in said park.I just worry about the factors that really make such a project such an uphill fight…
- Taking out a multi-generational favorite, so expectations are high
- taking down a capacity monster - so there is pressure on timelines
- a project started as a replacement, not because the concept was so strong on it’s own. Constraints alone are difficult, but to add in the pinch-hitter concept too? Alot of headwind there
- a project that requires touching basically everything in one of the largest attractions in the park. Basically scale alone makes properly funding a project like this difficult
- and now we are facing a financially competitive period where the company is facing huge external scrutiny and upheaval.
It would appear to do this well given the scale and pressures they would have to spend like it’s a marquee new attraction… not just a repurposed one. Do we have confidence that’s what the company is fully committed to?
Forget the target subject matter… just the big pieces make this a scary future to face
Also we have to see how much they are changing on the inside since the entire structure is made out of concrete. I honestly feel the Laughing Place is the reason they chose the salt mine theme since there isn't much you can do with that part of the ride unless you open up the mountain and start pouring more concrete also you got to work around the Flume that's already there.