JoeCamel
Well-Known Member
Fast & Furious would like a wordI guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
Fast & Furious would like a wordI guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
Of course not. But it boggles my mind that they chose this story. Chapek wants IP but certainly would have accepted a book report ride with “Friends on the Other Side” replacing the Laughin’ Place, which was a no brainer.I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
How do you know? I doubt you even work for Disney.By the way, looks like this closes in January and they think about 18 months will do it…
How do you know? I doubt you even work for Disney.
How do you know? I doubt you even work for Disney.
What if the permit isn’t for the retheme, since there were permits for Blizzard Beach's renovations?Based on the permit, that seems correct.
Oh that's the issue they really are at the mercy of the budget given to them.Yes, but will get the budget needed to make it the best attraction they can?
And yet, bad rides exist.I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
The individuals responsible for this attraction are not engineers or artists.I guarantee this team is trying its hardest to make the best attraction they can. No one sets out to make a bad ride.
They're spending a lot more than "leave it the hell alone," which would be the best attraction they can.Yes, but will get the budget needed to make it the best attraction they can?
We will always have Tokyo.And another tick is heard on Splash Mountain's death clock
I'm not saying that bad rides don't exist. I'm just saying no one is going into makeing a ride saying we're going to make a bad one. Outside factors such as budget and other limitations can happen. What sounds good in the idea phase won't necessarily work in practice. I'm not a fan of this retheming. I think the sequel angle with Tiana owning a food co-op is a weird premise.And yet, bad rides exist.
Maelstrom needed more ride system work, but still, the point stands. If they are just reskinning AAs, changing set dressings, and doing the exterior work, I guess it’s possible.Maelstrom - Frozen:
March 5 2014- June 21 2016 (844 days)
Splash - PATF:
Jan 31 2023 [Hypothetical] - June 30 2024 (512 days)
Let that sink in. This is most likely going to be done FASTER than FEA. On a much more detailed ride. On a much longer ride. Dear lord.
As easy (and largely correct) as it is to shun book-report rides, you absolutely can do it well, but man, imagine what 2022 WDI would cook up 11 years after The Little Mermaid's book report ride.Of course not. But it boggles my mind that they chose this story. Chapek wants IP but certainly would have accepted a book report ride with “Friends on the Other Side” replacing the Laughin’ Place, which was a no brainer.
Sorry for the tangent, but did y'all know that F&F is now... GOOD?!?!Fast & Furious would like a word
Maelstrom needed more ride system work, but still, the point stands. If they are just reskinning AAs, changing set dressings, and doing the exterior work, I guess it’s possible.
They took the old see-the-movie-about-the-country-which-we-didn't-make-part-of-the-ride theater room into an extended part of the water course. That alone was a major engineering revamp.They also did some some pavilion construction as part of FEA, right? I feel like they did something with the queue that didn't exist before, so it was more than just a retheme of the existing ride.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.