NoChesterHester
Well-Known Member
And now, after all our Sopranos talk...
Gandolfini's gone....
Damn.
Wow... Devastating. Almost six years to the day the final episode aired.
And now, after all our Sopranos talk...
Gandolfini's gone....
Damn.
I think Kalogridis can deal with and hopefully foil any bad ideas from within TDO, He is President after all. He is only powerless when it comes to Burbank's bad ideas like NextGen.
Thats irrelevant. Its called stealing the thunder.
Hey, no ones tackled the most important question of all. Will the lifestyler brigade be able to cope with having to go to the Studios for 5 solid years of construction pics for their blogs?
Which is why my confidence in WDW pulling off Universal levels of quality with these additions is at absolute zero.
New Fantasyland = Dreadfully weak creative papered over by ridiculous amounts of money spent and a fan base that thinks being associated with Disney brand merchandise makes them better people. Disney is the Abercrombie of theme park brands and they know it.
Avatar = Well this one could turn around alright. Eventually. One day.
No, not quite. But you were close when you mentioned what Abercrombie's CEO boasted.
A lot of low self-confidence consumers shop Abercrombie and wear it because it makes them look "cool." It's a self-esteem boost. Disney, through its exhaustive retelling of the "relatable girl becomes a princess and becomes happily ever after" story and its reputation for maintain perfect hyperreality environments for consumers to play in, also attracts a lot of low-self confidence consumers. When they visit the Magic Kingdom or when they wear a Disney shirt out in the real world, they get a self-esteem boost. They have become associated with "Disney," therefore they have become "better."
Everyone should think about that for five minutes. Then they will immediately understand why certain brands and releases of Disney merchandise basically sell themselves no matter high of a price Disney puts on them, while other more seemingly "sure thing" pursuits fall flat on their face.
Large and XL in bikinis doesn't always mean fat. (Wink)
Hey, I think that would make a great avatar for your profile on here!! Would tell people all they need to know about you in one picture...
I love the analogy, even if most WDW guests can't fit into Abercrombie clothing (yep, even with their beloved baked buns gone from MSUSA). I've said it many times, but there is a strong mental illness component in the fan community (much like the social media/Disney Lifestyle contingent) and people absolutely feel better and more special when they can associate themselves with TWDC.
Spirited aside: I finally joined D23 because they finally priced it at what I felt it was worth.
Spirited anecdote: a friend recently asked for advice for his first visit to DLR. I almost choked (no Spurs jokes, please) when I heard he wanted to stay at the DLH and what it would cost. I explained how he could likely save well over $1000 on a four night stay by opting for a non-Disney choice. But said friend, who I will bet you anything winds up at the DLH, asked what the 'emotional value' was of spending his first visit on property. This is the mentality that Disney goes for. Intelligent people acting like they are under the influence.
Interesting.A lot of low self-confidence consumers shop Abercrombie and wear it because it makes them look "cool." It's a self-esteem boost. Disney, through its exhaustive retelling of the "relatable girl becomes a princess and becomes happily ever after" story and its reputation for maintain perfect hyperreality environments for consumers to play in, also attracts a lot of low-self confidence consumers. When they visit the Magic Kingdom or when they wear a Disney shirt out in the real world, they get a self-esteem boost. They have become associated with "Disney," therefore they have become "better."
Everyone should think about that for five minutes. Then they will immediately understand why certain brands and releases of Disney merchandise basically sell themselves no matter high of a price Disney puts on them, while other more seemingly "sure thing" pursuits fall flat on their face.
This is an excellent analysis! It also does explain the reason for pixie dust addiction very well.
It's free to join D23. It's fun to be free!Spirited aside: I finally joined D23 because they finally priced it at what I felt it was worth.
Not sure if this has been answered yet, but here goes:I am sure they are already wetting themselves with what I like to call MCWA.
Oh, that stands for MAGICal Construction Wall Anticipation.
As an aside, I wonder how many were invited to UNI's opening tomorrow ...they don't seem to have as many bottom-feeders at their events.
The next stage of this I find more fascinating is how people have taken this to the next level and started associating themselves with blogs/websites that convey that Disney message. Like a Lou for example.
WRITE THE BOOK!!! WRITE THE BOOK!!!I love the analogy, even if most WDW guests can't fit into Abercrombie clothing (yep, even with their beloved baked buns gone from MSUSA). I've said it many times, but there is a strong mental illness component in the fan community (much like the social media/Disney Lifestyle contingent) and people absolutely feel better and more special when they can associate themselves with TWDC.
Spirited aside: I finally joined D23 because they finally priced it at what I felt it was worth.
Spirited anecdote: a friend recently asked for advice for his first visit to DLR. I almost choked (no Spurs jokes, please) when I heard he wanted to stay at the DLH and what it would cost. I explained how he could likely save well over $1000 on a four night stay by opting for a non-Disney choice. But said friend, who I will bet you anything winds up at the DLH, asked what the 'emotional value' was of spending his first visit on property. This is the mentality that Disney goes for. Intelligent people acting like they are under the influence.
Wow I just caught up on this thread after getting a bit behind. Spirit's threads are the best.
You know what is refreshing? That I am reading through pages and pages of stuff about NEW attractions. And it seems mostly to be about WHEN not IF. It seems almost certain that something big is going to happen at DHS (Big, Spirited change!) sooner rather than later (note: "sooner" is a relative term, this is Disney after all so five or six years counts as "sooner").
It is SO great that there has been very little talk in this thread about MM+, FP+, wristbands, RFID this, RFID that, 180-days-in-advance dining reservations, 60-days-in-advance Haunted Mansion reservations, 30-days-in-advance Dole Whip reservations , etc.
I'm lovin' my WDWMAGIC again!
we could all whine about Starbucks ruining MSUSA (the same one that has been in state of looking like an outlet mall since the mid-90s) ...or I don't even know, what is the community about these days?
Need I remind you that Monsters Inc Doors Coaster (or Crush's Coaster before that) has been in WHEN mode for about 5 years.
I'm not saying that it's not refreshing to see more rumors surfacing with even more details than before, but there's still a lot of "IF" involved WHEN we are talking WDW and TDO. Not to mention that these timelines are also 5 years out! I'm not getting any warm and fuzzies from this stuff. Not when punch # 2 of Uni's 1-2 Potter Punch is going to be opening a lot sooner!
Spirited anecdote: a friend recently asked for advice for his first visit to DLR. I almost choked (no Spurs jokes, please) when I heard he wanted to stay at the DLH and what it would cost. I explained how he could likely save well over $1000 on a four night stay by opting for a non-Disney choice. But said friend, who I will bet you anything winds up at the DLH, asked what the 'emotional value' was of spending his first visit on property. This is the mentality that Disney goes for. Intelligent people acting like they are under the influence.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.