"Very expensive" and "in some cases costing a lot"...all words that are music to the ears of TDO.
I remember @ParentsOf4 had a few posts where he had a similar theory to your tier system for FP+ for the resorts. Then since this is the new perk for staying on property they eliminate EMHs altogether and save a bunch on labor costs.
Yep, Disney just expects that people will stay longer to get 'all' the rides, I have a PAP I'm seriously considering not renewing, I'm DVC but all that means is I have a base in Orlando and there's a lot to do in Central FL besides Disney and UNI,
Bought an AP to KSC as DW and I are both geeks and we could spend 3-4 days there easily especially if they have launches scheduled.
Is there any way to get from Universal (hotels) to WDW property without renting a car? Just weighing my options for next year. I'd rather not rent a car, if I can avoid it...
Is there any way to get from Universal (hotels) to WDW property without renting a car? Just weighing my options for next year. I'd rather not rent a car, if I can avoid it...
Actually the CMs at Guest Relations get that question all the time and will happily tell you the best way to catch a taxi to Uni & the approximate fare.Call Disney... I'm sure they'll appreciate the question
Comment today from a Trip Report -
Thanks! I'm honesty a little tired of the FP+ doom and gloom from people that haven't tried it yet. I was not a fan of the idea of it at first, but we got lucky when testing it. No problems and the system really worked for us.
Comment today from a Trip Report -
Thanks! I'm honesty a little tired of the FP+ doom and gloom from people that haven't tried it yet. I was not a fan of the idea of it at first, but we got lucky when testing it. No problems and the system really worked for us.
As has already been covered, this is meaningless because the testing is ocurring in a vacuum where FP+ are plentiful, even at the last minute. If you got FP and FP+ with essentially all reservations available, I'm sure you'd think highly of the system too. While this testing is improtant for operational understanging, the feedback from users must be taken with a huge heaping of salt.
So you believe of the 13 people who have replied to my query so far... none of them ever missed out on getting a FP???... so they couldn't possibly reflect the majority demographic you insist is out there. Nevermind the statistical anomaly you propose that by taking a diverse random sample.. I somehow have missed the majority that exists.
You can lead a horse to water, but obviously you can't make them drink.
So this "real world" testing is meaningless but speculation based on hearsay is important enough for 330+ pages of comments?
Its not important because its the same as if Coca-Cola was announcing a new soft drink, so they ask Coke drinkers to sample it and give feedback. But, the new Coca-Cola flavor isnt ready yet so they have them sample the original Coca-Cola instead. Would you buy the new flavor based off someones review?So this "real world" testing is meaningless but speculation based on hearsay is important enough for 330+ pages of comments?
OK, for gods sake if it's that important to you, you win. You are my chief go to guy from now on if I want solid statistical proof based on 13 people out of millions. What am I thinking...I must be wrong. Now that this is done can we just move on to something that matters? Thanks.Depends on how it was asked? I already showed you how it was asked.
So you believe of the 13 people who have replied to my query so far... none of them ever missed out on getting a FP???... so they couldn't possibly reflect the majority demographic you insist is out there. Nevermind the statistical anomaly you propose that by taking a diverse random sample.. I somehow have missed the majority that exists.
You can lead a horse to water, but obviously you can't make them drink.
Dont insult the 13 Wise Elders of Face Book. Their knowledge is exceeded only by their power!OK, for gods sake if it's that important to you, you win. You are my chief go to guy from now on if I want solid statistical proof based on 13 people out of millions. What am I thinking...I must be wrong. Now that this is done can we just move on to something that matters? Thanks.
Both are probably without much meaning. But, this is the internet, so whatcha gonna do. But, to address your point, I think speculation about how a system will perform under real world circumstances is more important than testing in a vacuum. That's not to say this small scale testing isn't important from an ops perspective, understanding how easy to use the applciation is, etc... But, from an overall guest satisfaction perspective, I stand by my comment that it is meaningless. These guests are getting to use FP+ under ideal conditions (i.e, practically all reservations are available) while still being permitted to use FP. We all know that this simply won't be the case when the system goes live, and all guests have access to the reservations 60 days out.
I'll stick with actually results. One of the main reasons companies do roll outs of new systems in small phases is to work out all the bugs. I'm sure with a system as large as FP+ there are plenty of bugs to be worked out. I could argue that using FP+ in a testing group is anything but "ideal conditions".
The fact that the experiences have been so positive to date for me is actually quite impressive. People generally hate change and psychologically will be prone to not like "change", especially at first.
The company I work for made a massive upgrade to it's operating platform from an old, slow system that you couldn't navigate through unless you knew about a hundred "code words". The new system is quick, intuitive and far superior. My "area" was one of the first to get the new system and 95% of the employees absolutely freaked out. They complained about everything to the point where the new system was getting blamed for rainy days. It was fascinating to observe. Now, 8 months later I hear no more complaints and even some positive comments.
Anyway, you are correct; it is the internet.
If Virginia spent $2 billion to add a lane to the freeway I use on my commute everyday and let me and dozen other people test it out, we'd all love it and give rave reviews about the test. When testing concludes and the general populous is allowed on the lane, my thoughts about how wonderful that lane is will certainly change and, since my hypothetical takes place in the DC area, I assure you one lane will do nothing to solve the traffic problems.
That the FP+ infrastructure is functioning properly in small scale and usable and hence, getting good reviews is encouraging -- BUT, that is not most peoples main concern with FP+. I assume eventually disney will be able to make the system operable, I'm concerned about having to plan my rides 60 days in advance and having little to no availability to make changes on the day of. That concern is not being tested now and is, in my opinion, the biggest flaw in the entire FP+ plan. Of course, on a personal level, I am an uber planner and I think I will be able to use FP+ to my advantage.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.