I think you miss the point. For starters, the "key attractions" you refer to were not "closed". They didn't exist to begin with. There is a huge difference. As Captainkidd mentioned, you can't "miss" something that didn't exist in the first place. You're taking a present day situation, based on popular attractions that currently exist, and comparing that to a time when those attractions weren't even a glimmer in people's eyes. That's an apple to orange comparison. Also, your example refers to a time when ticket prices didn't reflect the ability to park hop (because there was only one park, hence no other parks to hop to), nor did the ticket prices reflect the number of attractions that exist today. So when an attraction is closed down, and people are aware of the existence of that attraction, then they'll likely miss it and be disappointed. That disappointment is compounded when multiple attractions are closed down. And it's compounded further still when the guest is paying full price and several of his/her favorite (i.e. most popular) attractions are closed down all at once. Is it being "demanding" for a person to say that he/she would choose not to visit under those circumstances? Not at all. To suggest that it is really indicates a lack of awareness of what is considered reasonable in a customer/business relationship.