Slash and Burn ...

agent86

New Member
It's become like network television. Execs couldn't care less about putting on a quality show, just so long as it keeps butts in the seats long enough to see five commercial breaks every hour. The actual shows are just bridges to get you from one advertisement to another.

Here's a news flash for you: That's ALWAYS been the point of network television. Advertising is how they make their money.
 

dxwwf3

Well-Known Member
Also let me say that I do realize it is a business. But nobody complains about the gift shop after POTC because the attraction is good and it deserves a shop. Tower of Terror gift shop? Never heard any complaints. For these attractions, the merchandise supports the attraction, not the other way around.

Most people would agree that the addition of SGE certainly seems to be merchandise based more than anything else, including AE complaints.
 

dxwwf3

Well-Known Member
I'm assuming you meant to say this the other way around.

No, but I can see how someone might read it that way. I meant to say that the merchandise is there in support of the attraction, not that the attraction is there in support of the merchandise available.

In other words the merchandise aids the experience and isn't the focus. That is more clear way :)
 

imagineer boy

Well-Known Member
Most people would agree that the addition of SGE certainly seems to be merchandise based more than anything else, including AE complaints.

Heck, they completely rediverted one of the exits of one of the theaters so that it exited into Mickey's Stat Traders...
 

Lee

Adventurer
Here's a news flash for you: That's ALWAYS been the point of network television. Advertising is how they make their money.
Of course TV has always been like that....but not Disney parks. It has only in fairly recent years that merchandise sales has become the focus of the parks.
 

Hakunamatata

Le Meh
Premium Member
The best ride concept in the world would get shot down if it wasn't guaranteed to sell tons of merchandise.:rolleyes:

Im assuming thats for new attractions as some of the older (and higher quality in my opinion) attractions like Hall of the Presidents and CoP probably sell little to no merchandise?
 

Lee

Adventurer
Im assuming thats for new attractions as some of the older (and higher quality in my opinion) attractions like Hall of the Presidents and CoP probably sell little to no merchandise?
Exactly, which would likely prevent them from being built in today's MK.
 

docandsix

Active Member
A depressing assertion...

To reassure myself, I'm trying to think of an example to prove Lee wrong.

Expedition Everest broke a fairly long drought during which most major attractions represented reiterations of movie or plush franchises. The only significant exceptions (if one counts them, which I do not) were the off-the-shelf carnival rides in Dinoland, U.S.A. After Everest came Soarin', which might be the best recent example of a major attraction that stands to sell relatively few trinkets.

Test Track, Misson:Space, and Rock'n'Roller Coaster were not based on films, but obviously geared to push retail sales.

I can accept the notion of Disney trying to capitalize on the quality of a major attraction by selling related merchandise (Everest, Tower of Terror, or Misson:Space, e.g.), but it discourages me a great deal to think that something like The American Adventure wouldn't be approved in WDW's current corporate culture.

Can anyone think of a similar attraction (Hall of Presidents, etc.) that has made it past planning and been built in the past decade? Most of Animal Kingdom (my favorite park, partly for this reason) was immune from this nonsense until Countdown to Extinction was rebranded after a horrible movie. (I realize that this may have been the plan all along.)

What about something like Big Thunder Mountain Railroad? Is even this sort of attraction now off the table? I know it's decades old, but it doesn't sell much if anything, as far as I can tell.

Finally, can those "in the know" tell us roughly what percentage of management remain true to Walt Disney's vision of family entertainment and theme park planning, and how high up in the food chain they have ascended?
 

Lee

Adventurer
To clarify a bit. My statements regarding attractions/merchandise were aimed soley at the MK.
This far the other three parks haven't been contaminated by this disease.
 

dxwwf3

Well-Known Member
To clarify a bit. My statements regarding attractions/merchandise were aimed soley at the MK.
This far the other three parks haven't been contaminated by this disease.

Looking at the most recent additions to all the parks, it doesn't appear that the other 3 are that far off. But yes the MK is the worst offender right now, no doubt.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
To reassure myself, I'm trying to think of an example to prove Lee wrong.

Expedition Everest broke a fairly long drought during which most major attractions represented reiterations of movie or plush franchises. The only significant exceptions (if one counts them, which I do not) were the off-the-shelf carnival rides in Dinoland, U.S.A. After Everest came Soarin', which might be the best recent example of a major attraction that stands to sell relatively few trinkets.

Test Track, Misson:Space, and Rock'n'Roller Coaster were not based on films, but obviously geared to push retail sales.

I can accept the notion of Disney trying to capitalize on the quality of a major attraction by selling related merchandise (Everest, Tower of Terror, or Misson:Space, e.g.), but it discourages me a great deal to think that something like The American Adventure wouldn't be approved in WDW's current corporate culture.

Can anyone think of a similar attraction (Hall of Presidents, etc.) that has made it past planning and been built in the past decade? Most of Animal Kingdom (my favorite park, partly for this reason) was immune from this nonsense until Countdown to Extinction was rebranded after a horrible movie. (I realize that this may have been the plan all along.)

What about something like Big Thunder Mountain Railroad? Is even this sort of attraction now off the table? I know it's decades old, but it doesn't sell much if anything, as far as I can tell.

Finally, can those "in the know" tell us roughly what percentage of management remain true to Walt Disney's vision of family entertainment and theme park planning, and how high up in the food chain they have ascended?

The truth can hurt sometimes

As for your other points, Soarin' and Everest are thrill rides and can be marketed to the teenage crowd that apparently hates Disney. Also, Everest does have a gift shop at the end of a ride unfortunately. The American Adventure? A 30 minute sit down theater show without characters to market? lolz
 

Southern Lady

New Member
Creatively not Slash and Burn

I first took my children to WDW in 1972. It was 26 years later that I took my grandchildren. What keeps me going every year is WDW creativeness. When it stops that, then I won't go. I go by myself now, and at age 72 still enjoy it. I have ridden every ride there except Space Mountain. I did not like Alien nor Stitch's Great Escape. I enjoy Its great to be a bug because its fun, and full of imagination.

Walt Disney's movie of Snow White came out in 1937. It was planned during the depression. People went to movies! In his book, Neal Gabler said "For Depression audiences specifically as well as for the audiences who would see the film in succeeding decades, Snow White's effect then was not so much in its escapism, as critics at the time of its release reported, as in its suggestion of vicarious power-for children over their own lives and for adults over the real world that often seemed beyond their control."

Where else do CM say, "Have a Magical Day". That says it all!
 

marcriss

Member
"But look at Disney ... Everest, the new 'signature' attraction at DAK runs with most of its effects inoperable (something that back in the 1980s and 90s would have had the ride shut down until things were fixed!) ... the highlight of the Nemo clam ride's angler fish hasn't worked in months ... the Davy Jones effect hasn't been working most of the time on PoC.

So ... I'm not looking to complain about the competition. I'm looking for Disney to get its damn act together. For $79 a day, these things should all be running in 100% show quality. Period. No excuses.[/QUOTE]

I asked someone about the Angler fish a couple of weeks ago. The CM said "it's not working right now" in a strange way. It led me to believe that they have the angler fish turned off, perhaps because it scared the kids.

I say "Turn it on!" The witch from Snow White still gives me the creeps, but I lived. And before I get criticized, I have a 6yr old and a 2yr old. You adapt (and for the record my 6yr old has "issues" so I'm used to anxiety-ridden kids).

I agree that quality has diminished all while prices increase. Disney's "brand" is "The Happiest Place on Earth." It's tough to live up to, but that's what they've chosen. I'm frustrated over the loss of value for my many dollars, but like many others I'll continue to go back. I just hope Disney realizes that they are hurting their core, the nuts who do keep coming back.

And one last thing: CoP, Swiss family, keel boats, river boat, etc have all been seasonal for decades. Same with TS Island. Your indication of how busy the parks are or how bad the weather is (for CoP) is whether these attractions are open.
 

Lee

Adventurer
I asked someone about the Angler fish a couple of weeks ago. The CM said "it's not working right now" in a strange way. It led me to believe that they have the angler fish turned off, perhaps because it scared the kids.
Nope. It's turned off because it doesn't work properly, if at all. THE major effect on the ride (other than the projections)and it is allowed to just sit there in the dark. Sad.
 

dxwwf3

Well-Known Member
Nope. It's turned off because it doesn't work properly, if at all. THE major effect on the ride (other than the projections)and it is allowed to just sit there in the dark. Sad.

I've seen it work once. Multiple trips and visits and I've seen it once. I've been a little luckier with the Yeti, but it is a shame that probably the two most exciting effects to be brought to the parks in 5 years are not working at all.
 

CBOMB

Active Member
Nope. It's turned off because it doesn't work properly, if at all. THE major effect on the ride (other than the projections)and it is allowed to just sit there in the dark. Sad.
Something tells me that with all the cuts that have already taken place, it is very unlikely that the Yeti or the Angler fish will be getting any attention soon. How could the number one vacation spot in the world allow this to happen?
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom