wedway71
Well-Known Member
This is my take on WDW Merchandise....
I think that the merchandise and the stores should tell a story. Just like everything else is themed in an area, merchandise should be no different. The focus and the attention to detail should not only be for attractions, bathrooms, places to eat, but also what is sold.
Nothing like walking through Frontierland with my Turkey Leg,listening to the whistle blowing from Big Thunder, and country music blaring in the speakers. Then walking in to a merchandise location to see Hanna Montana or Cars 2. I understand the concept of Synergy and driving sales for a new mega hit, but why cant they be more careful where they put place merchandise. Hannah Montana should be in Disney's Hollywood Studios. I would even be ok with seeing it in the Emporium since that is an"End All" Store for all Disney stuff.
I also wish they would have kept a larger selection of unique merchandise. I really do hate the Disney Parks goods. I used to love to see a nice polo or oxford with a specific area or resort. I know the Deluxe locations still do.
I can appreciate the formula for buying in bulk and getting lower cost and increasing profit margin. Despite understanding that concept, I dont have to like it. I think Disney Parks makes it very 6 Flags like.
It is true that if more unique products did sell, they would not be pulled from the shelves. There are ways to see what product movements are. One can pull an Ad Hoc report and just pull fastest selling to slower sellers and see. It is really easy to do.
I dont think it as much as a cost issue verses what is a selling issue. My understanding is that pretty much all of Disney merchandise has a pretty good gross margin and if an item is selling at such a great rate, why pull it? I am sure they can get a cheaper cost when in bulk BUT....if people are not buying those Disney Parks shirts, does it matter?
I think that the merchandise and the stores should tell a story. Just like everything else is themed in an area, merchandise should be no different. The focus and the attention to detail should not only be for attractions, bathrooms, places to eat, but also what is sold.
Nothing like walking through Frontierland with my Turkey Leg,listening to the whistle blowing from Big Thunder, and country music blaring in the speakers. Then walking in to a merchandise location to see Hanna Montana or Cars 2. I understand the concept of Synergy and driving sales for a new mega hit, but why cant they be more careful where they put place merchandise. Hannah Montana should be in Disney's Hollywood Studios. I would even be ok with seeing it in the Emporium since that is an"End All" Store for all Disney stuff.
I also wish they would have kept a larger selection of unique merchandise. I really do hate the Disney Parks goods. I used to love to see a nice polo or oxford with a specific area or resort. I know the Deluxe locations still do.
I can appreciate the formula for buying in bulk and getting lower cost and increasing profit margin. Despite understanding that concept, I dont have to like it. I think Disney Parks makes it very 6 Flags like.
It is true that if more unique products did sell, they would not be pulled from the shelves. There are ways to see what product movements are. One can pull an Ad Hoc report and just pull fastest selling to slower sellers and see. It is really easy to do.
I dont think it as much as a cost issue verses what is a selling issue. My understanding is that pretty much all of Disney merchandise has a pretty good gross margin and if an item is selling at such a great rate, why pull it? I am sure they can get a cheaper cost when in bulk BUT....if people are not buying those Disney Parks shirts, does it matter?