hpyhnt 1000
Well-Known Member
I really hope Disney doesn't waste money by rebranding Pop Century. Honestly, I don't know what they are trying to accomplish. So, lets, for arguments sake, say the All Stars are at a 95% occupancy rate and PC is at 85%. By rebranding, they increase the occuancy rate at PC by, lets say, 5%. Now, where do you think this 5% has come from? I doubt your going to get an influx of guests from off-site simply because you've "rebranded" the resort. This 5% is probably going to come from the All Stars! So, you've spent a couple million simply to redistribute your on-site guests between the value results. Great, now you can say PC is equal in occupancy with the AS; point is, its the same number of guests you had before! You didn't bring in anyone new, you just shuffled the people you already had around a bit! What difference does it make if a few more stay in one resort over the other? All that matters is that they're on property!
Personally, I like the resort as it is, and find the theme kinda neat. Spend the money on getting the Legendary Years completed instead of letting them rot like they were involved in a nuclear fallout, and leave the theme alone. i think the family suites are a great idea, since they seemed to be in rather high demand. In the long run, I don't see how rebranding will make a significant difference, so why bother? :shrug:
Personally, I like the resort as it is, and find the theme kinda neat. Spend the money on getting the Legendary Years completed instead of letting them rot like they were involved in a nuclear fallout, and leave the theme alone. i think the family suites are a great idea, since they seemed to be in rather high demand. In the long run, I don't see how rebranding will make a significant difference, so why bother? :shrug: