WDWFigment
Well-Known Member
I'm sorry you don't like my assessment. I don't like when people essentially say to others "You're wrong, but I can't tell you how I know you're wrong or why you are wrong. You simply have to believe that I know more than you."
I love the website, btw. But when you participate in the forums, you're just like the rest of us. Your credibility is judged by the information you provide, when you provide it and its accuracy.
The reality of the situation is that WDW has been feeding the same line of BS for three years and the only thing that's actually been accomplished at Pleasure Island was the introduction of seed and mulch. Could something actually be happening around the corner? Sure. But I'll believe it when I actually see it - that is the level of WDW's credibility on all PI related projects as far as I'm concerned.
If Steve says, as he clearly did here, that the reason he hasn't divulged more is to protect his sources? Why isn't that an acceptable answer?
I can understand wanting to know as much as possible, and it frustrates me from a "I want to know it all, too!" perspective when Steve posts something cryptic (as he has about Hyperion Wharf), but I'd much rather have those cryptic posts than him keeping quiet completely, which is the alternative.
Well, I guess the alternative is him just laying all of his cards on the table, and losing a valued source, but does anyone really want that?
Personally, I applaud Steve for treating his sources with respect and nurturing those relationships rather than compromising them to break a story and losing them for future scoops. I guess that's just me, though! :shrug: