aklodge
Active Member
peter11435 said:It was one of the original two resorts. It opened with WDW in 1971.
ogryn said:It opened in 1971, same as the Magic Kingdom, and Poly
thanks! both of you!
peter11435 said:It was one of the original two resorts. It opened with WDW in 1971.
ogryn said:It opened in 1971, same as the Magic Kingdom, and Poly
That's probably true for the most part. But if you look at it that way, then there's very few foods that originated in America. Corn, maybe?Slosh said:Although I doubt any of them haven't had apple pie (being French), or a hamburger (being German).
Slosh said:Although I doubt any of them haven't had apple pie (being French),...
Woody13 said:The only thing more American than apple pie is French fries.![]()
slappy magoo said:First thing I'd change is the name. From the moment it's refurbished (even before refurbishment is complete), the "Contemporary" starts to belie its name. To truly be contemporary, it would need to be redone far more frequently than it's economically feasible to do. Since it was one of the first hotels (with the most muted theme), call it the "Premier." Don't even try to wedge a theme into it; let it be the one hotel near the MK for people who would like to be close to the action but don't need the characters or a theme to enjoy themselves. But losing the name would be the first step towards making the hotel seem less anachronistic.
Lauriebar said:I certainly do not believe that a name change is neccessary. Traditionally Modern style is classic. Using neutral colors on the walls and floors, while using color accents on furniture and artwork is classic contemporary style. There would be no need to totally update every few years, only little changes to keep the decor fresh. To me, it is the monorails entering and exiting the hotel which is the cornerstone for the theme of the resort. This feature is what truely gives the building its modern theme. Contemporary means of the present time, not futuristic, so the whole space age theme is really unneccessary.
slappy magoo said:I understand the definition of Contemporary Design in architecture (with a Capital C), and I understand the Contemporary means that it's "of the now," not what will be. But that's the problem, there are inherently two definitions of "Contemporary" and I think most folks associate the word to be reflective of today's standards or styles. So many people will always look at the Contemporary and say "What's so contemporary about it?" the same way they used to joke that Tomorrow Land was Yesterday Land before it was overhauled. And the longer it's been since there was a renovation, the more those comments will ring true. I just think that changing the name of the hotel, to something as prestigious-sounding as the "Contemporary" will solve more problems than cause.
Slosh said:"...Even though the Floridian entirely ruined this setup, maybe the Contemporary should have been/be remodeled to match Tomorrowland better?
if that came true then we would need to change the name from the "Contemporary" to something like "Club WDW" or "Building that resembles club in SouthBeach" :lol:ogryn said:I'd like to see the Contempory updated to match current Tomorrowland status, as it is my favourite land at any Disneypark I've been to. Swooping Curves, and blue neon... put silver panelling over the dull concrete.
totally agree. it sounds like something that would be in a shack on the beach. i dont think fine dining when i hear that name. arent plates like $25-$50? it needs to be dressed up (the name)Jusjuice said:I think the California Grill could use a name change more than a redesign, as it doesn't exactly lend itself to trendy. (It sounds like a food court resturaunt.)
jmaxwell007 said:totally agree. it sounds like something that would be in a shack on the beach. i dont think fine dining when i hear that name. arent plates like $25-$50? it needs to be dressed up (the name)
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.