markjohns1
Member
I definitely agree with this assessment, but I think too often DVC is used as a talking point for the pitfalls at WDW. If anything, DVC should be helping the conditions at WDW through increased, repeat business. DVC is clearly working, so why shouldn't they want to continue to expand it? My question is, where are the profits generated at WDW going? It appears that it is not being reinvested back into WDW.As others have stated, it isn't a question of build the BLT or redo Fantasyland with new attractions or add timeshare to DAK Lodge or add some Tokyo-like attractions to DAK.
BUT ... it is a concern in that the only investment Burbank seems to want to make in O-Town is DVC.
And Disney PR will pass of these 'new' resorts in all their marketing and promo campaigns, much like they would attractions. 'See how can we be stale ... look at all the new stuff ...'
So no, as I've stated many times it isn't an either DVC or park investment question.
But it's definitely a problem when the only thing Disney really seems intent on building at WDW is timeshare.
And I don't know how much you can fault Disney PR for this. It seems like a lemonade-from-lemons situation for them. I don't think the execs are giving them a whole lot to work with.
Does anyone have actual information regarding whether or not any of the clubs were making a profit? Sure, having the clubs open would generate revenue, but were they actually even breaking even? It's clearly cause for concern that many/all of the 3rd party tenants have pulled out, but is the bottom line hurt by having the clubs open or closed at this point? No one has definitively proven that either way as far as I've seen. If someone has, link please.When I say empty I mean there is no one in them. As other people posted, they are begging 3rd party companies to come and fill the land. It just aggravates me that they have no plan for those building so they just let them sit there and rot while they could be making money off of the diehard fans of those clubs until they actually have a plan. But no they are sitting there in their VIP lounges with their tails between their legs because they can't deal with the fact that they made a mistake. I hope the clubs do open back up and when they do, opening night will be a roast of Kevin Lansberry and the others who wanted "family friendly atmosphere."
Exactly. I know the argument has often been that the clubs were "always" crowded, but crowd size does not even indicate profitability. If any of the theme parks are crowded, but very few drinks/merchandise is being sold, that is not likely to be a profitable day. I don't think anyone here can cite how well drink sales were at the clubs beyond random guessing.Yes, but there may be logistical issues that prevent that from happening. If it would take 6 months to retrain the staff and performers and get the clubs ready to open, who know who would have signed up in that time.
I don't think there was any proof ever presented either way that the clubs were making money.
While I can appreciate your passion, it seems to be obscuring some logical issues that may arise.
I think regardless of your position on the issue, any time you go from running owning/operating a portion of a resort to outsourcing to a 3rd party, that is the easy way to help the bottom line (or lazy way, depending on how you want to spin it). Unfortunately, the timing of current economic conditions caused the whole ship to go down. I wonder if the downturn will end up being the savior for AC, because not much else is going on in PI at this point.